Article Text

Download PDFPDF

The abscopal effect: efficacy of radiotherapy in patients on progression after treatment with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg
  1. Antonio M Grimaldi1,
  2. Ester Simeone1,
  3. Diana Giannarelli2,
  4. Marco Palla1,
  5. Paolo Muto1,
  6. Sara Falivene1,
  7. Fabio Sandomenico1,
  8. Antonella Petrillo1,
  9. Marcello Curvietto1,
  10. Assunta Esposito1,
  11. Miriam Paone1,
  12. Corrado Caracò1,
  13. Gennaro Ciliberto1,
  14. Nicola Mozzillo1 and
  15. Paolo A Ascierto1
  1. Aff1 grid.417893.00000000108072568Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione "G. Pascale" Naples Italy
  2. Aff2 grid.417520.50000000417605276IFO Rome Italy

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Meeting abstracts

Background

After more than 30 years, Ipilimumab was the first agent which showed a survival benefit for the treatment of metastatic melanoma. However, only about the 20% of patients have a long-term survival benefit. The combination of ipilimumab with other therapies might improve its efficacy.

A new phenomenon also known as abscopal effect refers to a regression of metastatic lesions distant from the primary site of radiotherapy (RT). This systemic response is observed in patients who received ipilimumab.

Here we reported the outcomes from patients treated in the ipilimumab Italian expanded access program (EAP) who received RT after ipilimumab progression.

Patients and methods

Patients with advanced melanoma who had received RT after ipilimumab progression were eligible for analysis. Radiotherapy was available upon physician request for patients who failed ipilimumab therapy and for whom no other therapeutic options were available.

Results

21 out of 95 patients treated with ipilimumab in the Italian EAP were eligible for the analysis. The median age was of 58 years (range 21-77); The progression free survival (PFS) from ipilimumab treatment was 4 months (range 3-6), while the time from the end of treatment with ipilimumab and RT was of 5 months (range 4-8).

RT was performed on brain in 13 (62%) patients: 8 were treated with whole-brain RT and 5 patients with stereotactic RT. Other RT treatment included bone, metastatic distant lymph nodes, sub-cutaneous metastasis, spinal cord metastatis. The median doses of radiation was of 30 Gy (range 30-50). A local response to RT was detected in 13 patients (62%) while 8 patients (38%) did not show any local regression. The abscopal response has been detected in 11/21 (52%) patients: in details, we observed 9 abscopal partial response (42,8%), 2 abscopal stable disease (9,6%), and 10 progression (47,6%). The median of occurrence of the abscopal response was of 1 month (range 1-4). The median overall survival (OS) for all the 21 patients was of 13 months (range 6-26). The median OS for patients with and without abscopal responses was respectively of 22.4 months (range 2,5-50,3) and 8,3 months (range 7,6-9.0). 11 (84,6%) out of 13 patients with local response showed an abscopal effect.

Conclusions

The RT after ipilimumab treatment may be an option for further potentiate its effect. Local response to RT might be predictive for the abscopal response and outcome. Further studies are warranted in this field to better understand and define the role of RT in combination or sequencing with ipilimumab treatment.