Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Genetically modified artificial antigen-presenting cells (aAPC) for expansion of melanoma tumor infiltrating lymphocytes with optimal properties for adoptive cell therapy
  1. Marie-Andrée Forget1,3,
  2. Shruti Malu1,
  3. Hiu Liu2,
  4. Christopher Toth1,
  5. Sourindra Maiti3,
  6. Charuta Kale1,
  7. Chantale Bernatchez1,
  8. Helen Huls3,
  9. Ena Wang2,
  10. Patrick Hwu1,
  11. Laurence J Cooper3 and
  12. Laszlo G Radvanyi1
  1. Aff1 grid.240145.60000000122914776Melanoma Medical OncologyMD Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX USA
  2. Aff2 grid.94365.3d0000000122975165Transfusion MedicineNational Institutes of Health Bethesda MD USA
  3. Aff3 grid.240145.60000000122914776Pediatrics ResearchMD Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX USA

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Meeting abstracts

Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) with expanded autologous tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) has emerged to be a powerful salvage therapy for metastatic melanoma with response rates up to 50%. However, the generation of the TIL ACT product is technically challenging with current methods requiring a large excess of allogeneic normal donor (pool) or patient-derived PBMC (200:1 ratio to the TIL) used as “feeders” to support a rapid expansion protocol (REP) to generate the final TIL infusion product. Because PBMC feeder products consist of a heterogenous cell population, it introduces undesired variability in TIL expansion rates and phenotype, especially in the yield of CD8+ T cells that are the most active component of the TIL product. Here, we have developed an alternative to PBMC feeders using a K562-based artificial antigen-presenting cell (aAPC) system expressing CD64, CD86, and 4-1BBL that is much more practical and cost-effective. Using PBMC feeders as controls, we found an optimal aAPC:TIL ratio (50:1) supporting maximal TIL expansion used for subsequent experiments. Analysis of the resulting TIL products from multiple experiments revealed that the aAPC induced higher rates of CD8+ T cell expansion with a comparable effector-memory phenotype as TIL expanded with the traditional PBMC feeder approach. The exceptions were CD56 that was more highly expressed on the CD8+ cells and CD28 which had a lower expression. Notably, TIL expanded with aAPC were enriched in CD8+ BTLA+ T cells, a subset highly correlated with clinical response to ACT. TCR Vαβ clonotype analysis also found that TIL expansion with the aAPC did not alter the diversity of the T cell repertoire. Further analysis using gene chip profiling revealed significant differences in gene expression in TIL products expanded using the aAPC versus with PBMC feeders. These included an up-regulation of certain genes in the Wnt pathway, cyclic nucleotide metabolism, and multiple genes in different stem cell pathways. This more stem-like profile may have beneficial properties following adoptive transfer. Finally, we found that CD8+ TIL expanded with aAPC had a similar anti-tumor effector cell activity in CTL and IFN-γ release assays. Overall, our data demonstrates that this aAPC system is a suitable alternative to generate clinical-grade melanoma TIL infusion products for ACT that produces comparable and perhaps even more active T cells than current methods. Our group is currently phasing in the use of these aAPC for our GMP TIL production.