Article Text
Abstract
Background IL-2 was first approved by FDA for the solid tumor treatment. However, the therapeutic window of IL-2 (low dose suppresses immune system by Treg activation and high dose represents toxicity) limited its clinical use. The major dose-limiting toxicity IL-2 is vascular leak syndrome (VLS). The mechanism of VLS is mainly considered as the direct interaction of IL-2 with IL-2Rα expressed on endothelial cells in vivo1, 2 or by over-stimulation of immune cells.3, 4 To get rid of the IL-2Rα interaction, non-α IL-2 muteins were designed to deplete the Treg expansion which may contributes to its anti-tumor efficacy (figure 1). However, they still remain the risk of overstimulated immune response.
Here, we introduce our IL-2 variant, CGC-601, which abolished its binding to IL-2Rα, while obtained a structural twist on four α-helix (figure 2). This brand new molecule was designed as a non-suppressive and moderate immune agonist, through the strategy of de-coupling the IL-2 binding pattern to ”βγ-only”.
Results CGC-601 does not bind to IL-2Rα or IL-2Rβ alone, while only binds to βγ complex with the similar affinity to wtIL-2 in a ”fast-on, fast-off” feature (figure 3). Moreover, CGC-601 shows a low Treg response and mild CD8 T and NK activation in human PBMC (figure 4). For T cell expansion, upon 50nM treatment, CGC-601 holds a similar T cell expansion capacity with rhIL-2 (figure 5A). Meanwhile, CGC-601 expands both CD8 T cells and NK cells, but Treg expansion dramatically constrained after PBMC ex vivo expansion (figure 5B). Thus, compare with rhIL-2, CGC-601 gives ”young” and less differentiated T cells after expansion (figure 6).
In the toxicity test, CGC-601 dose as high as 30 mg/kg, mice stay in good health conditions, while 10 mg/kg rhIL-2 showed a severe weight loss and a reduced activity since Day 3, suggesting CGC-601 has a much safer profile than rhIL-2 (figure 7A). Pulmonary edema is significantly reduced even CGC-601 dose reached 30mg/kg (figure 7B). CGC-601 treatment did not elevate serum IL-5 levels 6 hrs after the first dose (Fig. 7C). CGC-601 prefers C8 T cells and NK cells expansion, on the contrary, CGC-601 does not expand Tregs in vivo (figure 8).
Conclusions CGC-601 with a unique βγ-only binding property, promotes moderate CD8 T and NK expansion and diminishes immunosuppressive Tregs in vivo, has a great potential in immune-stimulation indications. CGC-601’s safety evidence sets up a platform allowing multiple application scenarios (figure 9).
References
Boyman O, et al. Selective stimulation of T cell subsets with antibody-cytokine immune complexes. Science. 2006;311:1924–1927.
Krieg C, et al. Improved IL-2 immunotherapy by selective stimulation of IL-2 receptors on lymphocytes and endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:11906–11911.
Li Y, et al. Regulatory T cells control toxicity in a humanized model of IL-2 therapy. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1762.
Shanafelt AB, et al. A T-cell-selective interleukin 2 mutein exhibits potent antitumor activity and is well tolerated in vivo. Nat Biotechnol. 2000;18:1197–1202.
Schematic of IL-2 and no-α IL-2 variants in immuno-regulation
The design of CGC-601
CGC-601 has a distinct IL-2 receptor binding profile
CGC-601 has a no IL-2Rαβγ preferable signaling activation
CGC-601 retains T cell proliferation activity
CGC-601 presents a high potential in T cell expansion
CGC-601 exhibits an excellent in vivo safety profile
CGC-601 effectively expand CD8 T and NK cells, but not Tregs in vivo
CGC-601 sets up a platform allowing multiple application scenarios