Article Text

Download PDFPDF

1279 A novel graphical deep neural network learning approach utilizing molecular data for optimizing patient selection for treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors: An ORIEN pan-cancer study
Free
  1. Issam El Naqa1,
  2. Payman Ghasemi1,
  3. Aik Choon Tan1,
  4. James Chen2,
  5. Aakrosh Ratan3,
  6. Martin McCarter4,
  7. John Carpten5,
  8. Howard Colman6,
  9. Alexandra Ikeguchi7,
  10. Igor Puzanov8,
  11. Susanne Arnold9,
  12. Michelle Churchman10,
  13. Patrick Hwu1,
  14. Jose Conejo-Garcia1,
  15. William (Bill) Dalton10,
  16. George Weiner11 and
  17. Ahmad Tarhini12
  1. 1Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Inst., Tampa, FL, USA
  2. 2The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
  3. 3University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
  4. 4University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
  5. 5USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
  6. 6Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
  7. 7Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
  8. 8Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
  9. 9Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY, USA
  10. 10M2GEN, ORIEN, Tampa, FL, USA
  11. 11University of Iowa Holden Comprehensive, Iowa City, IA, USA
  12. 12H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA

Abstract

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have made significant improvements in the treatment of cancer patients (pts), but many continue to experience primary or secondary resistance. Here, we leveraged clinical and genomic data to identify prognostic biomarkers in pts treated with ICIs utilizing a pan-cancer approach.

Methods Patients were enrolled to the Total Cancer Care protocol (NCT03977402) across 18 cancer centers within the Oncology Research Information Exchange Network® (ORIEN). All included subjects provided an IRB-approved written informed consent at their participating institutions. RNA-seq was performed on tumors following the RSEM pipeline and gene expressions were quantified as Transcript Per Million (TPM) and were logarithmically normalized. A graphical neural network (GNN) architecture was developed based on the prior knowledge of genes and pathways. For comparison, immunoscore for each patient was calculated based on the estimated densities of tumor CD3+ and CD8+ T cells (Galon et. al., 2020) utilizing CIBERSORTx. The quality of overall survival (OS) predictions was assessed using Harrell’s concordance index (C-index). Log-rank test was used to assess stratified group differences (by ICI or cancer histology) along with Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis of GNN and immunoscore.

Results Patients (n=522) with 4 cancer types including melanoma (n=125), renal cell carcinoma (n=149), non-small cell lung cancer (n=128) and head and neck cancer (n=120) treated with 6 ICI regimens were included in this analysis. ICI regimens were nivolumab (n=219), pembrolizumab (n=202), ipilimumab+nivolumab (n=69), ipilimumab (n=30), avelumab (n=1) and cemiplimab (n=1). Table 1 summarizes the overall C-index and associated 95% Cls and log-rank P values for the entire cohort (regardless of histology) resulting from our proposed GNN and the separate estimated immunoscore categorization. The corresponding KM plots showed significantly wider separations of the survival curves in favor of our proposed GNN relative to the immunoscore with more than 30% improvement in prediction power. Table 2 presents the summary of GNN top selected pathways alongside their hazard rate and their univariate Cox p-value.

Conclusions GNN analysis is a promising tool to identify relevant prognostic biomarkers in cancer patients treated with ICI. This may lead to novel therapeutic predictive signatures and identification of mechanisms of ICI resistance. Our GNN gene expression signature was significantly prognostic and outperformed the estimated CD3+, CD8+ T Cell immunoscore. Further refinements to our prediction power are ongoing along with more advanced neural network architectures to elucidate related functional pathways. Validation and functional studies will follow.

Acknowledgements We are grateful to the participating patients and their family members as well as all research staff supporting the conduct of the Total Cancer Care protocol.

Trial Registration NCT03977402

Ethics Approval Patients were enrolled to the Total Cancer Care protocol (NCT03977402) across 18 cancer centers within the Oncology Research Information Exchange Network® (ORIEN). All included subjects provided an IRB-approved written informed consent at their participating institutions.

Abstract 1279 Table 1

Prediction performance comparison between the GNN a

Abstract 1279 Table 2

Top pathways selected by graphical neural network

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.