Article Text

Download PDFPDF

523 Small cell lung cancer molecular subtypes and vulnerability to immune checkpoint blockade
  1. Barzin Nabet1,
  2. Habib Hamidi1,
  3. Romain Banchereau1,
  4. Stefanie Morris2,
  5. Leah Adler2,
  6. Minu Srivastava1,
  7. Namrata Patil1,
  8. Carl Gay3,
  9. John Minna4,
  10. John Heymach3,
  11. Joseph Chan5,
  12. Charles Rudin5,
  13. Lauren Byers3,
  14. Stephen Liu6,
  15. Martin Reck7 and
  16. David Shames1
  1. 1Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, United States
  2. 2Roche, Basel, Switzerland
  3. 3MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
  4. 4UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
  5. 5Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
  6. 6Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, United States
  7. 7German Center of Lung Research, Ahrensburg, Germany


Background Extensive-stage (ES) small cell lung cancer (SCLC) disproportionately contributes to annual lung cancer-related deaths.1,2,3 Following the pivotal Phase III IMpower133 study, the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab, combined with carboplatin and etoposide (CE), was the first immune checkpoint inhibitor approved for first-line treatment of ES-SCLC and is now a standard-of-care.4 In general, SCLC tumors are immunological deserts with limited tumor cell PD-L1 expression.5,6 Previous subtyping define SCLC tumors as neuroendocrine (NE) (ASCL1 or NEUROD1-driven) and non-neuroendocrine (nonNE) (POU2F3 or an Inflamed subtype). 5,7,8,9 Subtyping approaches have been limited to small cohorts and cell lines, with associated clinical outcomes suggesting improved benefit of the inflamed subtype with immunotherapy.5

Methods We analyzed pre-treatment RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) from 271 patient tumors from IMpower133. We applied nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) to define SCLC classes within this dataset and correlated these new subtypes with clinical outcomes to atezolizumab+CE versus placebo+CE. We defined cell-intrinsic and –extrinsic hallmarks of each subtype with differential gene expression analyses.

Results We identify four subtypes that can be characterized by both cell-intrinsic and tumor microenvironmental features. The subtypes include NEUROD1-driven (NE-N, 31%), ASCL1-driven (NE-A, 33%), NE inflamed (NE-I, 14%), and nonNE inflamed (nonNE-I, 22%). Prior classification schema had one inflamed subgroup, whereas we identify two clusters with inflamed hallmarks. We observe both a NE-I and nonNE-I group with enrichment for T cells, B/plasma cells, antigen presentation machinery, and immune cell PD-L1 expression.

We find that while the NE-A and NE-N subtypes show similar atezolizumab+CE benefit compared to placebo, the inflamed subtypes have markedly distinct outcomes. The NE-I subtype shows a near doubling of median overall survival (OS) with atezolizumab+CE compared to placebo+CE (OS HR, 0.45 [0.22-0.89]), while the nonNE-I subtype shows no benefit despite hallmarks of lymphocyte inflammation and PD-L1 expression (OS HR, 1.02 [0.55-1.91]). The balance of T-effector to tumor-associated macrophage (TAM) signals distinguish these two inflamed subtypes (NE-I and nonNE-I). Tumors with high T-effector and high TAM signals have similar OS with atezolizumab+CE and placebo+CE (OS HR, 0.85 [0.53-1.37]), while tumors with high T-effector, but low TAM signals demonstrate markedly longer OS with atezolizumab+CE compared to placebo+CE (OS HR, 0.26 [0.12-0.57]).

Conclusions We further refine SCLC subtypes and describe a spectrum of heterogeneity. We identify two inflamed subtypes with distinct clinical outcomes to atezolizumab+CE therapy dependent on the balance of T-effector to TAM infiltration. These results demonstrate the potential for personalization of therapy for SCLC patients based on molecular subtypes.

Acknowledgements We thank the patients and their families. Medical writing assistance for this manuscript was provided by Michael J. Williams, PhD of Health Interactions and funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.


  1. Fruh M, De Ruysscher D, Popat S, Crino L, Peters S, Felip E, and Group EGW. Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2013 24(Suppl 6), vi99–105. 10.1093/annonc/mdt178.

  2. Gazdar AF, Bunn PA, and Minna, JD. Small-cell lung cancer: what we know, what we need to know and the path forward. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017 17, 765. 10.1038/nrc.2017.106.

  3. van Meerbeeck JP, FenonNEll DA, and De Ruysscher DK. Small-cell lung cancer. Lancet 2011 378, 1741–1755. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60165-7.

  4. Horn L, Mansfield AS, Szczesna A, Havel L, Krzakowski M, Hochmair MJ, Huemer F, Losonczy G, Johnson ML, Nishio M, et al. First-line atezolizumab plus chemotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2018 379, 2220–2229. 10.1056/NEJMoa1809064.

  5. Gay CM, Stewart CA, Park, EM, Diao L, Groves SM, Heeke S, Nabet BY, Fujimoto J, Solis LM, Lu W, et al. Patterns of transcription factor programs and immune pathway activation define four major subtypes of SCLC with distinct therapeutic vulnerabilities. Cancer Cell 2021 39, 346–360 e347. 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.12.014.

  6. Liu SV, Reck M, Mansfield AS, Mok T, Scherpereel A, Reinmuth N, Garassino MC, De Castro Carpeno J, Califano R, Nishio M, et al. Updated overall survival and pd-l1 subgroup analysis of patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer treated with atezolizumab, carboplatin, and etoposide (IMpower133). J Clin Oncol 2021 39, 619–630. 10.1200/JCO.20.01055.

  7. Carney DN, Gazdar AF, Bepler G, Guccion JG, Marangos PJ, Moody TW, Zweig MH, and Minna JD. Establishment and identification of small cell lung cancer cell lines having classic and variant features. Cancer Res 1985 45, 2913–2923.

  8. Gazdar AF, Carney DN, Nau MM, and Minna JD. Characterization of variant subclasses of cell lines derived from small cell lung cancer having distinctive biochemical, morphological, and growth properties. Cancer Res 1985 45, 2924–2930.

  9. Rudin CM, Poirier JT, Byers LA, Dive C, Dowlati A, George J, Heymach JV, Johnson JE, Lehman JM, MacPherson D, et al. Molecular subtypes of small cell lung cancer: a synthesis of human and mouse model data. Nat Rev Cancer 2019: 19, 289–297. 10.1038/s41568-019-0133-9.

Ethics Approval The study protocol for IMpower133 was approved by the institutional review board or independent ethics committee for each study site and was performed in full accordance with the Guideline for Good Clinical Practice and the Declaration of Helsinki. All human tumor specimens in this study, and subsequent evaluations, were used in accordance with the informed consent agreements obtained from all subjects.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.