Article Text

Original research
Macrophage-inherited exosome excise tumor immunosuppression to expedite immune-activated ferroptosis
  1. Duo Wang1,2,
  2. Guanhua Qiu1,2,
  3. Xiaoqi Zhu1,2,
  4. Qin Wang1,2,
  5. Chunyan Zhu3,
  6. Chao Fang3,
  7. Junjie Liu1,2,
  8. Kun Zhang3,4 and
  9. Yan Liu1,2
  1. 1Department of Medical Ultrasound, Department of Breast, Bone and Soft Tissue Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
  2. 2Key Laboratory of Early Prevention and Treatment for Regional High Frequency Tumor, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
  3. 3Central Laboratory, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
  4. 4National Center for International Research of Bio-targeting Theranostics, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
  1. Correspondence to Professor Kun Zhang; zhang1986kun{at}; Professor Yan Liu; liuyan{at}


Background Immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (ITM) remains an obstacle that jeopardizes clinical immunotherapy.

Methods To address this concern, we have engineered an exosome inherited from M1-pheototype macrophages, which thereby retain functions and ingredients of the parent M1-phenotype macrophages. The delivered RSL3 that serves as a common ferroptosis inducer can reduce the levels of ferroptosis hallmarkers (eg, glutathione and glutathione peroxidase 4), break the redox homeostasis to magnify oxidative stress accumulation, promote the expression of ferroptosis-related proteins, and induce robust ferroptosis of tumor cells, accompanied with which systematic immune response activation can bbe realized. M1 macrophage-derived exosomes can inherit more functions and genetic substances than nanovesicles since nanovesicles inevitably suffer from substance and function loss caused by extrusion-arised structural damage.

Results Inspired by it, spontaneous homing to tumor and M2-like macrophage polarization into M1-like ones are attained, which not only significantly magnify oxidative stress but also mitigate ITM including M2-like macrophage polarization and regulatory T cell decrease, and regulate death pathways.

Conclusions All these actions accomplish a synergistic antitumor enhancement against tumor progression, thus paving a general route to mitigate ITM, activate immune responses, and magnify ferroptosis.

  • Tumor Microenvironment

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request.

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


  • M1-derived nanovesicles have been obtained based on RAW264.7 via mechanical extrusion that may pose membrane protein loss or destruction and fail to retain the functions of parent macrophages, and they have been explored in targeted delivery and combined therapy after combining targeting design and immune activation.


  • This study demonstrates that it is safe and feasible to integrate natural inflammation tropism-mediated accumulation, ferroptosis, redox homeostasis disruption, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment mitigation and reactive oxygen species accumulation into one exosome-based delivery system and exert the synergistic antitumor effects.


  • This study provides safe, convincing and feasible data for future studies in immune-desert tumor microenvironment modulation and enhanced ferroptosis.


Immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (ITM) is generally identified to be the primary reason of many immunotherapy failures associated with poor clinical benefits,1–4 for example, anti-PD1/L1-represented immune checkpoint blockading therapy because it can bring about poor action persistence, disable immunological surveillance, and favor immune escape. Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are accepted as one component to contribute to the complex ITM,5 6 wherein the M2-phenotype TAMs exert the protumorigenic effect via imprisoning cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and resisting the antitumor actions.7 8 To address it, great efforts and advances have been made. Typically, nanotechnology-enhanced treatment methods, for example, sonodynamic therapy (SDT),9–11 photodynamic therapy (PDT),12 photothermal ablation,13 chemodynamic therapy (CDT),14 radiotherapy,15 radiofrequency ablation,16 17 etc, have been developed to activate systematic immune responses and mitigate ITM via promoting M2-phenotype TAMs’ polarization and elevating cytokine secretions and CTLs infiltrations. Actually, reactive oxygen species (ROS) in SDT, PDT, or CDT are the primary factor that drives protumorigenic M2 TAM polarization into antitumorigenic M1 ones,4 18 19 which also have been validated to drive the differentiation and proliferation of stem cells.20–22 Therein, the multiple combined actions significantly inhibited tumor progression and metastasis especially after combining with immunotherapy or tumor microenvironment modulation. Besides nanotechnology-enhanced treatment methods, nanotechnology-enabled death pathway regulation is another route to dictate ITM and immunotherapy. Generally, apoptosis, ferroptosis, and pyroptosis are three typical programmed death pathways,23–26 wherein ferroptosis has been documented to induce robust immune responses akin to pyroptosis.27–30 Therefore, nanotechnology-modulated ferroptosis is also expected to reverse ITM and enhance immunotherapy.

In the aforementioned nanotechnology-encouraged strategies, highly efficient nanodelivery of functional agents is an indispensable prerequisite. Various active or negative targeting strategies have been attempted to enhance the accumulation for magnifying the diagnosis or/and treatment outcomes,31–33 for example, acceptor-mediated active targeting,31 ultrasound or radiofrequency-enhanced permeability,33–35 etc. With inheriting from the parent cancer cells or inflammatory cells, their extracellular exosomes or extrusion-engineered nanovesicles are also imparted with high tropism and spontaneous homing ability,36 which are highly desirable for specifically delivering drugs, genes, proteins, or other functional nanoparticles.37–40 Nevertheless, the structure destruction and size shrinkage during the mechanical extrusion of nanovesicles inevitably cause the loss of genetic materials or information (proteins, cytokines, RNA, etc), disabling the extruded nanovesicles to completely retain the functions of their parent exosomes, let alone the functions of inflammatory progenitor cells.41–43

In this report, we engineered M1 macrophage-inherited exosome (M1-Exo) that loaded the ferroptosis inducer (ie, RSL3) (RSL3-carried exosome (RSL3-Exo)) for elevating RSL3 retention in tumor and excising ITM, which reinforced the immune responses to cooperatively favor ferroptosis. Herein, the loaded RLS3 as the ferroptosis inducer can decrease glutathione (GSH) level, downregulate glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) and expedite ROS accumulation in tumor.44 45 More significantly, M1 macrophage-represented immune cells that outperform tumor cells in activating or enhancing antitumor immunity are much preferable to engineer exosomes. The M1-Exos are expected to retain the ingredients and functions of M1 macrophages for spontaneous homing to tumor, activating immune responses and alleviating ITM since the production process fails to experience the extrusion-caused structure destruction and component loss that nanovesicles encountered.46–49 Contributed by the ITM mitigation and homing-mediated high RSL3 accumulation caused by such M1-Exos, the protumorigenic M2 TAM polarization into antitumorigenic M1 ones, as well as regulatory T-cell (Treg) decrease, was reached (figure 1). They were validated to significantly enhance ferroptosis via provoking systematic immune responses and regulating ferroptosis-related protumorigenic and antitumorigenic protein expressions, as indicated in figure 1. The macrophage-inherited exosome engineering provides a general route to manipulate the immune microenvironment and enhance ferroptosis or other death pathway-activated immune response for resisting tumor progression.

Figure 1

Schematic explaining how macrophage-inherited exosome executioners mitigate ITM to expedite immune-activated ferroptosis through promoting M2 macrophage polarization into M1, and downregulating GPX4 and GSH, increasing ROS level, promoting CD8+ T and CTL infiltrations and decreasing Tregs. CTL, cytotoxic T lymphocyte; GPX4, glutathione peroxidase 4; GSH, glutathione; ITM, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment; ROS, reactive oxygen species; Treg, regulatory T cell.

Results and discussion

M1-Exo collection and RSL3-Exo engineering

The M1-Exo and RSL3-Exo are acquired according to the sequential route, as shown in figure 2A. In detail, bone marrow-derived macrophages were isolated from bone tissue of mice, and then the stimulated by lipopolysaccharide to obtain M1-phenotype macrophages, followed by M1-Exo production and collection. Ultimately, RSL3 was added and enter Exo to obtain RSL3-Exo. Western blot (WB) analysis indicates the secreted exosomes retain the proteins of their parent M1-phenotype macrophages, as shown in figure 2B, denoting that the M1-Exo is ensured to have the ability of spontaneous homing to tumor. The size of Exo is determined to be around 100 nm by the transmission electron microscopy observation and nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA), as evidenced in figure 2C, and the loading percentage of RSL3 is determined to be 4.76%. Intriguingly, after loading RSL3, the obtained RLS3-Exo shows the approximately identical size to Exo (figure 2D), indicating RSL3 entrapment fails to alter the Exo size.

Figure 2

Characterization and test on the Exo and RSL3-Exo. (A) The synthetic procedure of Exo and RSL3-Exo. (B) Western blot patterns of parent macrophage and secreted Exo. (C,D) Size distribution and the corresponding TEM images of Exo (C) and RSL3-Exo (D) via nanoparticle tracking analysis. BMDM, bone marrow-derived macrophage; RSL3-Exo, RSL3-carried exosome; TEM, transmission electron microscopy.

In vitro ferroptosis test induced by RSL3-Exo

High accumulation of functional agents including drugs or probes is the precondition of highly efficient diagnosis or treatment of one lesion. Appealingly, the spontaneous homing to tumor is anticipated to be imparted with Exo and RSL3-Exo since they retain the parent proteins of M1 macrophages capable of spontaneously approaching and entering tumor tissues.50 51 As expected, a large number of RSL3-Exo infect 4T1 tumor cells, and as the incubation time is prolonged, more RSL3-Exos target and are retained in 4T1 cells, as displayed in online supplemental figure S1.

Supplemental material

To investigate ferroptosis induced by RSL3-Exo, some typical markers mattering ferroptosis was inspected. It has been extensively accepted that ferroptosis is characterized with lipid peroxidation, GSH decrease and GPX4 downregulation.30 44 After careful examinations, it is found that Exo alone fails to induce lipid peroxidation, while RSL3-contained groups result in the tremendously increased lipid peroxidation (figure 3A), which can be attributed to the fact that RSL3 as the specific ferroptosis inducer initiates the ferroptosis process. Subsequently, WB result reveals that the ferroptosis launching in RSL3-contained groups further gives rise to GPX4 downregulation (figure 3B). In light of the close correlation between GPX4 and GSH, the GPX4 downregulation also implies GSH decrease,44 which will benefit ROS accumulation via the redox balance disruption.9 After staining with GSH and ROS indicators postcorresponding treatment in different groups, RSL3 alone is found to remarkably decrease GSH level. Once combined with Exo-mediated active targeting, more RSL3 molecules are delivered into 4T1 cells, making RSL3-Exo harvest the most descendent magnitude of GSH, as confirmed by the confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) observation and semiquantitative analysis (figure 3C,D). On the contrary, the RSL3-Exo group receives the highest ROS accumulation (figure 3C,E). All these variations of ferroptosis hallmarkers convincingly suggest the significantly enhanced ferroptosis induced by such RSL3-loaded exosomes and M1-Exo (ie, RSL3-Exo).

Figure 3

In vitro tests on ferroptosis via detecting its biomarkers or pathological characteristics. (A) CLSM images of 4T1 cells stained with lipid peroxidation probe (ie, C11 BODIPY 581/591) after different treatments in their corresponding groups. (B) WB patterns of 4T1 cells after different treatments in their corresponding groups for determining the expression of Ferroptosis biomarker (GPX4). (C) CLSM images of 4T1 cells stained with GSH and ROS indicators after different treatments in their corresponding groups. (D,E) Quantitative levels of ROS and GSH in 4T1 cells after different treatments in their corresponding groups, which was obtained from their CLSM images (C). (F) CLSM images of 4T1 cells stained with live/dead dyes (ie, PI/calcein-AM) after different treatments in their corresponding groups, where PI-stained red cells and calcein-AM-stained green cells indicate dead and live cells, respectively. (G,H) Clone tests for detecting proliferation level of 4T1 cells after different treatments in their corresponding groups including via optical microscopic observation (G) and quantitative verification (H). Scale bar: 50 µm. Data are expressed as mean±SD (n=3). One-way analysis of variance was used to analyze the statistical differences between two groups. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001. CLSM, confocal laser scanning microscopy; GPX4, glutathione peroxidase 4; GSH, glutathione; PI, propidium iodide; ROS, reactive oxygen species; WB, western blot.

To explore how the enhanced ferroptosis-arised death pathways exert the influencing action on antitumor outcome, in vitro 4T1 death induced by RSL3-Exo was surveyed. First, propidium iodide (PI) and calcein-AM, two dyes for labeling dead and live cells, were harnessed to stain 4T1 cells after different treatments so as to differentiate the dead cells.52 Contributed by the most ROS accumulation, green fluorescence representing live cells completely recedes, and red fluorescence representing dead cells almost illuminate all cells (figure 3F), suggesting that RSL3-Exo treatment indeed orients the ferroptosis pathway to kill cancer cells. Subsequently, clone formation assay unveiling RSL3 brings about the prominently decreased proliferation of 4T1 cells, while the Exo-enabled high RSL3 accumulation further inhibits the proliferation, which encourages the highest inhibition rate of 4T1 cells, as evidenced in figure 3G,H. Similar results are obtained in the flow cytometry (FCM) test, wherein PI and annexin V were leveraged to stain dead and live cells and differentiate the phase. Results show that RSL3-Exo treatment leads to the highest death percentage (above 70%) compared with RSL3 alone (approximately 40%) or Exo alone (below 20%) (online supplemental figure S2). Actually, such RSL3-loaded exosomes and M1-Exo (ie, RSL3-Exo) can be extended to other tumors, for example, colorectal cancer. To verify it, colorectal cancer cell line (CT26) serves as the model, and RSL3-Exo also poses GSH drop and ROS rise via activating the ferroptosis pathway (online supplemental figure S3), triggering the most deaths of CT26 cells, as indicated by the CLSM observation and clone formation assay (online supplemental figures S4 and S5).

In vivo antitumor assessment using RSL3-Exo-enhanced ferroptosis

Inspired by the appealing results in vitro, in vivo distribution and antitumor tests were carried on. To visually trace the accumulation and distribution of RSL3-Exo, in vivo animal fluorescence imaging was implemented and a near-infrared fluorescence dye (indocyanine green (ICG)) featuring high light penetration depth was used instead of RSL3. As the observation time proceeds, it is found that more and more ICG-labeled Exos progressively enter and accumulate in the tumor, reaches the highest level at 18 hours post injection, and then metabolism is initiated, as indicated in figure 4A. Astonishingly, even though 48 hours has passed away, there are still lots of Exo retention in the tumor (figure 4A,B), which will favor the in vivo RSL3-Exo-enhanced ferroptosis anti-tumor outcome.

Figure 4

In vivo homing and antitumor test via induced ferroptosis and enhanced immune responses. (A) In vivo time-dependent fluorescence images and the corresponding average fluorescence intensities of 4T1 tumor-bearing mice after intravenously injecting RSL3-Exo. (B) Ex vivo fluorescence images and the corresponding average fluorescence intensities of isolated tumors and main organs from 4T1 tumor-bearing mice after 48 hours postintravenous injection of RSL3-Exo. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n=3).(C) The operation procedure of in vivo antitumor experiment on BALB/C female 4T1 tumor-bearing mice. (D) The time-dependent tumor growth profile of each mouse in each group after the corresponding treatments. (E) The average time-dependent tumor growth profiles of mice in each group after the corresponding treatments. (F,G) Digital photos (F) and weights (G) of isolated tumors from 4T1 tumor-bearing mice after the corresponding treatments in each group. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n=5).(H) The time-correlated survival rate of 4T1 tumor-bearing mice after the corresponding treatments in each group. (I) In vivo WB bands for determining various death-related proteins in 4T1 tumors isolated from 4T1 tumor-bearing mice after the corresponding treatments in each group. (J,K) CLSM images (J) and quantitative data (K) of 4T1 tumor slices stained with GPX4 and ROS immunofluorescence indicators, respectively, which were collected from 4T1 tumor-bearing mice that experienced different treatments in the corresponding groups. Scale bar: 50 µm. Data are expressed as mean±SD (n=3). One-way analysis of variance was used to analyze the statistical differences between two groups. **P<0.01, ***P<0.001. CLSM, confocal laser scanning microscopy; GPX4, glutathione peroxidase 4; ROS, reactive oxygen species; RSL3-Exo, RSL3-carried exosome; WB, western blot.

The in vivo antitumor procedure is outlined in figure 4C, where once intravenous injection per 2 days with five administered in total was set. According to the time-dependent tumor growth profiles of each group (figure 4D,E), both RSL3-contaiend groups (ie, RSL3 alone and RSL3-Exo) delay tumor growth. In particular, the two actions of Exo homing-mediated high accumulation and RSL3-enabled ferroptosis synergize to contribute to the largest inhibitory rate. Intriguingly, Exo alone also inhibit tumor progression to some extent, which uncovers that Exo alone probably activates or enhances innate immune responses. The activated innate immunity even overtakes RSL3-induced adaptive immune response in resisting tumor growth. Thereby, besides the two actions (ie, Exo homing-mediated high accumulation and RSL3-enabled ferroptosis), M1-Exo-arised innate immunity and ferroptosis-activated adaptive immunity also contributed to the significantly elevated antitumor activity. More significantly, since the exosomes inherit M1 macrophages, they are ensured to impart with the ability to regulate ITM to further enhance the innate and adaptive immune responses.

At the end of the experimental period, tumors in each group were collected and photographed, and their weights were obtained. In accord with the trend of tumor growth profiles in the four groups, RSL3 alone and Exo alone delay the tumor growth, while RSL3-Exo harvests the lowest tumor weight (figure 4F,G). The alleviation trend of tumor burden is also consistent with the prolonging magnitude of mice survival in different groups, wherein RSL3-Exo also acquired the longest survival rate (figure 4H). During the experimental period, no fluctuation of body weight of tumor-bearing mice in each group is observed (online supplemental figure S6), ensuring the treatment safety. Pathological examinations proceeded, and cancer cell density and more terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated nick end labeling apoptosis are accessible to the most optical antitumor group (RSL3-Exo), as shown in online supplemental figure S7.

To unmask whether the ferroptosis pathway activation was responsible for the excellent antitumor consequence, some typical ferroptosis-related proteins were examined.30 As can be found in figure 4I, some proapoptotic proteins, including cytc, caspase-3 and caspase-9 in the four groups, are gradually upregulated, which matches the trend of antitumor outcome: control<RSL3 alone<Exo alone<RSL3 Exo. In contrast, the antiapoptotic protein (eg, PARP(poly ADP-ribose polymerase)) is downregulated. Additionally, evidence of direct ferroptosis is obtained, and two typical ferroptosis hallmarkers, that is, GPX4 and ROS, are highly expressed as the antitumor outcome varies, as demonstrated by the signal comparison of green fluorescence-positive GPX4 and red fluorescence-positive ROS among various groups (figure 4J,K).

Survey on ITM mitigation and immune activation by such RSL3-loaded exosomes and M1-Exo

As stated previously, M1-Exo also exerted the robust antitumor outcome, and thus is speculated to excise ITM to enhance the RSL3 ferroptosis-activated immune responses. To understand it, immune-related explorations were made. First, the protumorigenic M2-type macrophage polarization was assessed since it is one main target of complex ITM. FCM analysis shows that M1-Exo remarkably raises the percentage of M1 macrophages and reduces the proportion of M2 macrophages in tumor compared with control and RSL3 alone, as shown in figure 5A,B. Notably, RSL3-induced ferroptosis is also responsible for M2-type macrophage polarization, akin to reports.53 54 On this account, the highest level of M1 macrophages and the lowest level of M2 macrophages are reached, and the ratio of M1 macrophages to M2 ones is raised to the highest level in such RSL3-loaded and M1-Exo (figure 5C). This phenomenon adequately suggests that M1 macrophage-derived exosomes can expedite the polarization of protumorigenic M2-type macrophages into antitumorigenic M1-like ones, probably through releasing the cytokines, and propel ITM mitigation.

Figure 5

Mechanism exploration on ferroptosis-unlocked ITM alleviation and immune activation by such macrophage-inherited exosome executioners. (A) FCM patterns and (B) quantitative percentages of CD86+ (M1-like TAMs) and CD206+ cells (M2-like TAMs) gating from CD11b+F4/80+ macrophages in 4T1 tumor after 21 days postcorresponding treatment in different groups. (C) The ratio of M1 TAMs to M2 TAMs in 4T1 tumor after 21 days postcorresponding treatment in different groups. (E–G) FCM patterns and quantitative percentages of CD3+CD8+ T cells (D), IFN-γ+CD8+CD3+ T cells (E) and Tregs (FOXP3+CD4+CD3+) (F) in 4T1 tumor after 21 days postcorresponding treatment in different groups. (G,H) Secretion levels of antitumorigenic cytokines (ie, IFN-γ and TNF-α) (G) and protumorigenic ones (ie, IL-10 and TGF-β) (H) in 4T1 tumor after 21 days postcorresponding treatment in different groups. Data are expressed as mean±SD (n=3). One-way analysis of variance was used to analyze the statistical differences between two groups. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001. FCM, flow cytometry; IFN-γ, interferon gamma; IL, interleukin; ITM, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment; TAM, tumor-associated macrophage; TGF-β, transforming growth factor beta; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor alpha; Treg, regulatory T cell.

Furthermore, the immunotherapy executor, CD8+ T lymphocytes, were tracked. The infiltrated percentages of CD8+ and interferon gamma (IFN-γ)+CD8+ gating from CD3+ cells gradually increase as the treatment outcome positively evolves from control to RSL3, to Exo and to the RSL3-Exo group, as revealed by the FCM patterns and quantitative statistical data (figure 5D,E). These results mean that RSL3-Exo indeed recruits the most infiltrations of CD8+ and IFN-γ+CD8+ T cells, which, therefore, cooperates with ITM mitigation to exert the most robust immunotherapy actions to resist tumor progression and harvest the highest inhibitory rate against 4T1 tumor growth. A similar result is obtained in the immunofluorescence assay, as shown in online supplemental figure S8, wherein the highest CD8 expression emerges in the RSL3-Exo group. Astonishingly, besides promoting M2-type macrophage polarization to mitigate ITM, Tregs (CD4+Foxp3+ cells) are also decreased (figure 5F). Such RSL3-loaded exosomes and M1-Exo give birth to the lowest Treg level, which can further support ITM mitigation and explain why immunotherapy elevation produces the inspiring antitumor outcomes. It is worth noting that ESL3-loaded exosomes induce ROS elevation, propel the accumulation of lipid peroxides and reinforce ferroptosis in the intrinsic immune cells, including M2-TAM, Tregs, CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells (online supplemental figures S9–S11) since no new infiltrated immune cells were observed on the 11th day (online supplemental figure S12). In contrast, on the 21st day, the treatment with ESL3-loaded exosomes failed to influence the newly infiltrated immune cells. Afterwards, the secretion levels of protumorigenic and antitumorigenic cytokines were tested, and IFN-γ and tumor necrosis factor alpha as the tumor-resistant cytokines were significantly upregulated, and coincidentally another two tumor-supportive cytokines (eg, IL-10 and transforming growth factor beta) were rapidly decreased as the treatment outcome moved forward, as indicated in figure 5G,H. All these results uncover that the two desirable components (exosomes and RSL3) in such RSL3-loaded exosome and M1-Exo can facilitate RSL3-Exo to home to tumor, induce ferroptosis, mitigate ITM associating with M2 macrophage polarization into M1 ones and Treg downregulation, and activate and enhance systematic immune responses for inhibiting tumor progression.

The biological tissue-derived exosomes and RSL3 are two biocompatible components. Thus, it is no doubt that RSL3-Exo fails to cause evidently histopathological variations of normal organ and affect normal functions of the kidney and liver, as evidenced by no structure loss and no statistically significant fluctuation of kidney and liver indexes (online supplemental figures S13 and S14). The excellent biosafety determines that RSL3-Exo holds high clinical translation against various tumors.


In summary, we successfully constructed the RSL3-loaded exosome and M1-Exo (RSL3-Exo). With inheriting from parent M1 macrophages, the obtained exosomes in RSL-Exo were validated to spontaneous home to the tumor and accumulate in the tumor in vitro and in vivo, and moreover, they could significantly promote the polarization of protumorigenic M2-type macrophages into antitumorigenic M1-like counterparts and decrease Tregs to mitigate ITM. More significantly, the high accumulation and mitigated ITM enabled RSL3-Exo to magnify ferroptosis via activating and enhancing the systematic immune responses and regulating ferroptosis-correlated protein expressions, which eventually acquired a desirable outcome against 4T1 tumor progression. Collectively, the biocompatible M1-Exo engineering strategy furnished a general method to successfully excise tumor immunosuppression for expediting immune-activated ferroptosis of breast tumor.

Experimental section

All materials, characterization, and experimental details have been added in the supporting information.

Supporting information available

Experimental sections including Materials and methods and online supplemental figures S1–S14 are provided in the supporting information.

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Ethics approval

Not applicable.


Supplementary materials

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.


  • DW and GQ contributed equally.

  • Contributors DW and GQ contributed equally to this work. KZ conceived this project. DW, GQ and KZ designed the experimental contents and plans. DW, GQ, XZ, QW, CZ, CF, and JL performed the experiments. KZ, DW, and YL analyzed the data. KZ and DW wrote the original manuscript, and subsequently meticulously scrutinized and revised the manuscript. YL, JL, and KZ supported and supervised the project. YL and KZ acted as guarantors. All authors commented on this article.

  • Funding This work was supported by Guangxi Medical University Training Program for Distinguished Young Scholars, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 82160341, 82022033, and 81960477), Guangxi Natural Science Foundation Key Project (2022GXNSFDA035060), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (22120210561), and the program for Shanghai Young Top-Notch Talent.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.