Article Text

Download PDFPDF

1265 Single-institution retrospective review of patient’s diagnosed with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy-related pneumonitis
  1. Antonious Hazim,
  2. Damian McGlothlin,
  3. Gordon Ruan,
  4. Irene Riestra Guiance,
  5. Keith Mcconn,
  6. Jacob Shreve,
  7. Robert Haemmerle,
  8. Konstantinos Leventakos and
  9. Ashley Egan
  1. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
  • Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer (JITC) preprint. The copyright holder for this preprint are the authors/funders, who have granted JITC permission to display the preprint. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.


Background Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy-related (ICI) pneumonitis poses a significant challenge in patients with cancer. There is paucity of data on patient characteristics and outcomes in this population.

Methods This is a retrospective study of patients diagnosed with ICI pneumonitis at the Mayo Clinic from 2014 to 2022. A list of patients was compiled using Mayo Clinic’s informatics tool, Advanced Text Explorer, with keywords ‘pneumonitis’ and ‘immunotherapy’ (n=848). All cases were independently reviewed by our pulmonology specialist (A.E.) to confirm the appropriate diagnosis which yielded 170 patients. Excluded patients were those with alternative diagnoses. The grading of pneumonitis was defined in accordance with ASCO guidelines.1

Results 170 patients with ICI pneumonitis were included (median age 67; range 25–87) and 48% were male (table 1). The severity of ICI pneumonitis was as follows: grade 1 (n=17, 10%), grade 2 (n=85, 50%), grade 3 (n=53, 31%), and grade 4 (n=15, 9%). The median time from initiation of immunotherapy to development of ICI pneumonitis was 4 months (interquartile range 2 - 9.5). 47 (28%) had another ICI toxicity. Median overall survival (OS) was 2.5 years (95%, CI: 1.8-NR). A higher grade of ICI pneumonitis was associated with inferior outcomes (HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.5–2.8, p<0.001), while PD-L1 expression, age at diagnosis of ICI pneumonitis, and smoking status were not associated with inferior outcomes (p > 0.05). 51 (30%) were rechallenged with immunotherapy after an initial episode of ICI pneumonitis. Among those rechallenged, 23 (45%) developed recurrent pneumonitis (78% grade 2, 22% grade 3–4). Patients rechallenged, had significantly improved outcomes compared to patients who were not rechallenged (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.2 – 0.7, p=0.001). On subset analysis, we identified the majority of the benefit was from patients with grade 2 severity (figure 1). The median OS based on grade of ICI pneumonitis was 28 months (95% CI: 28-NR) for grade 1, 52 months (95% CI: 38-NR) for grade 2, 13 months (95% CI: 7.6-NR) for grade 3, and 4 months (95% CI: 2.2-NR) for grade 4.

Conclusions Patients with grade 1–2 ICI pneumonitis do significantly better than patients with grade 3–4 ICI pneumonitis. Rechallenge may result in a high frequency of recurrent pneumonitis (45%); however, patients who were rechallenged had significantly improved outcomes compared to patients who were not rechallenged. Further studies should be done to validate whether all patients with ≤ grade 2 pneumonitis should undergo a rechallenge.

Ethics Approval This study was approved by the Mayo Clinic IRB.


  1. Schneider BJ, et. al. Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: ASCO Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Dec 20;39(36):4073–4126. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01440. Epub 2021 Nov 1. Erratum in: J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jan 20;40(3):315. PMID: 34724392.

Abstract 1265 Table 1

Patient Characteristics

Abstract 1265 Figure 1

Swimmers plot comparing grade 1–4 immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy-related pneumonitis with and without rechallenge of immunotherapy

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.