Article Text

Download PDFPDF

1332 rHSA-CORMs: a CO-based approach in cancer immunotherapy
  1. Carlos Almeida and
  2. Gonçalo Bernardes
  1. Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
  • Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer (JITC) preprint. The copyright holder for this preprint are the authors/funders, who have granted JITC permission to display the preprint. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.


Background Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide and incidence rates have systematically increased over the years.1 Immunotherapy, a treatment strategy that harnesses the immune system to specifically target tumor cells, has completely changed the outlook for cancer patients by becoming the standard of care for various types of cancer.2–5 However, immunotherapeutics are not effective in all cancer patients and often do not yield durable clinical responses.6–8 Therefore, new tactics in promoting anti-tumor immune responses and to specifically delivery drugs to tumors need to be sought. Carbon monoxide (CO) is a gaseous mediator with several pleiotropic and immunomodulatory effects that has been found to have tumor-suppressive roles in numerous cancer models.9–18 However, the role of CO in cancer immunity is virtually unknown. Our project aims to dissect the molecular mechanisms and the cellular entities underlying CO-mediated effects by coupling the anticancer potential of CO-releasing molecule 3 (CORM-3) with the tumor-targeting capacity of a recombinant form of human serum albumin (rHSA)19 into a single agent.

Methods We selected two syngeneic murine colorectal cancer models, CT26 and MC38, to induce tumors in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice, respectively. Tumor-bearing mice were treated with our conjugate of rHSA with CORM-3 (rHSA-CORM) to assess efficacy and survival. Additionally, we performed an immune profiling and in vitro culture of macrophages to dissect the mechanisms subjacent to rHSA-CORM anti-tumor effects.

Results A substantial attenuation of tumor growth and an increase in overall survival was seen in mice following rHSA-CORM treatments. No differences were observed between treatment groups in tumor-bearing immunocompromised mice (NSG). Immune characterization showed a reduction in tumor-infiltrating monocytes and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), whereas NK cells presented higher expression of IFN-y and TNFa and CD8 T cells less PD-1 and CTLA-4 double expression with rHSA-CORM treatments. Using an in vitro model of macrophage differentiation we observed that monocytes were more sensitive to CO levels than macrophages.

Conclusions rHSA-CORM treatments demonstrated significant anticancer effects in mice, attenuating tumor growth and prolonging survival. By characterizing the immune composition of tumors we showed that rHSA-CORM treatments reduced TAMs, releasing immune cells from the suppressive environment of CT26 tumors and enabling the establishment of antitumor immune responses. In vitro macrophage differentiation demonstrates that CO mustn’t act by specifically impairing the monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation process, but by affecting the viability of monocytes before differentiation. Further studies are ongoing to clarify how rHSA-CORM influences monocyte homeostasis and macrophage generation.

Acknowledgements Karine Serre and Gonçalo Bernardes have greatly contributed to the design and conceptualization of the project Cong Tang, Inês Albuquerque, Ana Raquel Coelho, Maria Rebelo, Bárbara Sousa, Miguel Chaves-Ferreira performed or assisted in experiments, having contributed to the investigation conducted in the course of this project.


  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–249

  2. Waldman AD, Fritz JM, Lenardo MJ. A guide to cancer immunotherapy: from T cell basic science to clinical practice. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020;20:651–668.

  3. Gajewski TF, Schreiber H, Fu Y-X. Innate and adaptive immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Nat. Immunol. 2013;14:1014–22.

  4. Farkona S, Diamandis EP, Blasutig IM. Cancer immunotherapy: the beginning of the end of cancer? BMC Med. 2016;14:73.

  5. Khalil DN, Smith EL, Brentjens RJ, Wolchok JD. The future of cancer treatment: immunomodulation, CARs and combination immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2016;13:273–290.

  6. Kersten K, Salvagno C, De Visser KE. Exploiting the immunomodulatory properties of chemotherapeutic drugs to improve the success of cancer immunotherapy. Front. Immunol. 2015;6.

  7. Pitt JM, et al. Resistance Mechanisms to Immune-Checkpoint Blockade in Cancer: Tumor-Intrinsic and -Extrinsic Factors. Immunity. 2016;44:1255–1269.

  8. Sharma P, Allison JP. The future of immune checkpoint therapy. Science. 2015;348:56–61.

  9. Tenhunen R, Marver H, Schmid R. Microsomal heme oxygenase, characterization of the enzyme. J. Biol. Chem. 1969;244:6388–6394.

  10. Maines MD. The heme oxygenase system: a regulator of second messenger gases. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 1997;37:517–554.

  11. Motterlini R, Foresti R. Biological signaling by carbon monoxide and carbon monoxide-releasing molecules. Am. J. Physio.-Cell Physio. 2017;312(3)302–313.

  12. Clark JE, Naughton P, Shurey S, Green CJ, Johnson TR, Mann BE, Foresti R, Motterlini R. Cardioprotective actions by a water-soluble carbon monoxide-releasing molecule. Circ. Res. 2003;93:e2-e8.

  13. Brouard S, Otterbein LE, Anrather J, Tobiasch E, Bach FH, Choi AM, Soares MP. Carbon monoxide generated by heme oxygenase 1 suppresses endothelial cell apoptosis. J Exp Med. 2000;192:1015–1026.

  14. Sato K, Balla J, Otterbein L, Smith RN, Brouard S, Lin Y, Csizmadia E, Sevigny J, Robson SC, Vercellotti G, Choi AM, Bach FH, Soares MP. Carbon monoxide generated by heme oxygenase-1 suppresses the rejection of mouse-to-rat cardiac transplants. J Immunol. 2001;166:4185–4194.

  15. Amano MT, Camara NO. The immunomodulatory role of carbon monoxide during transplantation. Med. Gas. Res. 2003;3:1.

  16. Motterlini R, Otterbein LE. The therapeutic potential of carbon monoxide. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2010;9:728–743.

  17. Chaves-Ferreira M, et al. Spontaneous CO Release from Ru(II) (CO)2 -Protein Complexes in Aqueous Solution, Cells, and Mice. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2014:1172–1175.

  18. Szabo C. Gasotransmitters in cancer: from pathophysiology to experimental therapy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2015;15:185–203.

  19. Hoogenboezem EN, Duvall CL. Harnessing albumin as a carrier for cancer therapies. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2018;130:73–89.

Ethics Approval Animal studies were conducted in compliance with the EU and national legislation and were approved by the Portuguese veterinary authority (license no. 018085\2021) and the institutional animal ethics committee.

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.