Article Text

Download PDFPDF

133 The 31-gene expression profile test stratifies recurrence-free and melanoma-specific survival in patients with stage IB-IIA and stage IIB cutaneous melanoma
  1. Robert W Cook1,
  2. Sonia K Morgan-Linnell1,
  3. Brian J Martin1,
  4. Christine N Bailey1 and
  5. Abel Jarell2
  1. 1Castle Biosciences, Inc., Friendswood, TX, USA
  2. 2Northeast Dermatology Associates, P.C., Portsmouth, NH, USA


Background Patients with stage IB-IIA cutaneous melanoma (CM) account for approximately one quarter of all patients with melanoma, have 20–38% recurrence rates, and 6–12% melanoma-specific mortality rates by 10 years,1 2 but they are not eligible for adjuvant immunotherapy. By comparison, immunotherapy is approved for adjuvant treatment of patients with stage IIB CM. Molecular testing of stage IB-IIA patients with the 31-GEP test can identify patients who have a risk of recurrence similar to that seen for stage IIB patients and may benefit from immunotherapy. The 31-gene expression profile test (31-GEP) stratifies patients into low (Class 1A), intermediate (Class 1B/2A), or high (Class 2B) risk of recurrence, metastasis, and death.

Methods Patients with stage IB-IIA (n=673) and IIB (n=174) CM from previously published prospective and retrospective studies (N=847) were analyzed by the 31-GEP.3–8 Five-year RFS and MSS risk stratification was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis with the log-rank test.

Results The 31-GEP stratified 5-year RFS among patients with stage IB-IIA CM (Class 1A=91.8% vs. Class 1B/2A=85.1% vs. Class 2B=64.2%, p<0.001) and those with stage IIB CM (Class 1A=75.0% vs. Class 1B/2A=78.4% vs. Class 2B=55.4%, p=0.02). The 31-GEP also significantly stratified 5-year MSS for those with stage IB-IIA CM (Class 1A=99.2% vs. Class 1B/2A=96.9% vs. Class 2B=87.6%, p<0.001) and those with stage IIB CM (Class 1A=100% vs. Class 1B/2A=94.9% vs. Class 2B=90.4%, p=0.02). Multivariable analysis with the 31-GEP (Class 1A, Class 1B/2A, and Class 2B) and AJCC stage (IB vs. IIA) found that, among stage IB-IIA patients, Class 1B/2A (HR=1.72, p=0.048), Class 2B (HR=3.33, p<0.001), and stage IIA (HR=1.84, p=0.006) were significant predictors of recurrence. Only the 31-GEP Class 2B result was a significant predictor of melanoma-specific mortality in multivariable analysis for patients with stage IB-IIA CM (HR=7.90, p<0.001).

Conclusions In patients with stage IB-IIA CM, the 31-GEP identified those with a high risk of recurrent disease (64.2% 5-year RFS for Class 2B), which was like that of stage IIB CM (63.4% overall 5-year RFS), for whom adjuvant therapy is approved. The 31-GEP provided significant risk stratification for both recurrence and melanoma-specific mortality in patients with stage IB-IIA CM, a group that can have a nearly 40% recurrence rate but is not currently eligible for adjuvant immunotherapies. The 31-GEP provides personalized, independent risk stratification, which enhances adjuvant therapy selection in future clinical trials in this population.


  1. Garbe C, Keim U, Amaral T, Berking C, Eigentler TK, Flatz L, et al. Prognosis of Patients With Primary Melanoma Stage I and II According to American Joint Committee on Cancer Version 8 Validated in Two Independent Cohorts: Implications for Adjuvant Treatment. JCO [Internet]. 2022 Jun 16 [cited 2022 Jun 20]; Available from:

  2. Gershenwald JE, Scolyer RA, Hess KR, Sondak VK, Long GV, Ross MI, et al. Melanoma staging: Evidence-based changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA: A cancer journal for clinicians. 2017 Nov;67(6):472–92.

  3. Podlipnik S, Carrera C, Boada A, Richarz NA, López-Estebaranz JL, Pinedo-Moraleda F, et al. Early outcome of a 31-gene expression profile test in 86 AJCC stage IB-II melanoma patients. A prospective multicentre cohort study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019 May;33(5):857–62.

  4. Hsueh EC, DeBloom JR, Lee JH, Sussman JJ, Covington KR, Caruso HG, et al. Long-Term Outcomes in a Multicenter, Prospective Cohort Evaluating the Prognostic 31-Gene Expression Profile for Cutaneous Melanoma. JCO Precision Oncology. 2021 Nov 1;5(5):589–601.

  5. Greenhaw BN, Covington KR, Kurley SJ, Yeniay Y, Cao NA, Plasseraud KM, et al. Molecular risk prediction in cutaneous melanoma: a meta-analysis of the 31-gene expression profile prognostic test in 1,479 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Mar;83(3):745–53.

  6. Gastman BR, Gerami P, Kurley SJ, Cook RW, Leachman S, Vetto JT. Identification of patients at risk of metastasis using a prognostic 31-gene expression profile in subpopulations of melanoma patients with favorable outcomes by standard criteria. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Jan;80(1):149–157.e4.

  7. Jarell A, Skenderis B, Dillon LD, Dillon K, Martin B, Quick AP, et al. The 31-gene expression profile stratifies recurrence and metastasis risk in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Future Oncol. 2021 Dec;17(36):5023–31.

  8. Greenhaw BN, Zitelli JA, Brodland DG. Estimation of Prognosis in Invasive Cutaneous Melanoma: An Independent Study of the Accuracy of a Gene Expression Profile Test. Dermatol Surg. 2018 Dec;44(12):1494–500.

Ethics Approval Each cohort included in the analysis received institutional review board approval at the affiliated institutional IRB.

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.