Background African Americans (AA), who have the highest colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality rates of all racial groups in the US, have a 20% higher likelihood of getting CRC and a 40% higher death rate.1 In 2018 the American Cancer Society (ACS) modified its guidelines to recommend beginning CRC screening at age 45. In October 2020, the USPSTF adapted these ACS guidelines. We aim to study CRC disparities and precision cancer prevention in bringing awareness and addressing CRC disparities.
Methods A comprehensive staged literature search utilizing the PRISMA guidelines was performed on PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, using relevant Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) keywords. After full-text analysis, all papers were screened and included only relevant articles on CRC Disparity.
Results We found that genetic factors contribute 35% to the overall risk of CRC. Genetic and biological differences like tumor microenvironment between White and AA communities play a crucial role in developing an aggressive tumor and its progression. For AA communities, an increased expression of cytokines and tumor-expressed macrophages in the tumor environment has a significant role in unchecked CRC progression. Currently, AA are more likely to be diagnosed later and have higher mortality rates at any age of diagnosis than Whites.2 AA typically experiences delays or ends the treatment early, in addition to the specific disparities within chemotherapy administration.2–4 Among Native Americans, CRC is the second most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death. Other minority groups, including Ashkenazi Jews, are at a higher risk for CRC due to specific gene mutations.2
Conclusions Germline genetics and tumor phenotype can be correlated to racial identity and are one of the reasons why AA has higher mortality rates. The tumor microenvironment is impacted by non-genetic risk factors such as tobacco consumption and differences in the gut microbiome. In addition, communities of low socioeconomic status are impacted by discrepancies in CRC treatment and poorer medical care for AA, adding another aspect to the racial disparities in CRC diagnosis and management.5 Precision cancer prevention is the key to addressing CRC disparity. It will be helpful to improve access to CRC screening programs via state funding.6 Promoting CRC education about justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion awareness among PCPs and community workers in high-risk areas outside the catchment area of existing National Cancer Institutes (NCI) will be beneficial.7
Abigail Silva, Nazia Sayad, Fernando De Maio, Maureen Benjamins; Abstract B137: Colorectal cancer mortality and disparities in America’s 30 most populous cities. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1 June 2020;29(6_Supplement_2):B137. https://doi.org/10.1158/1538–7755.DISP19-B137
Soneji S, Iyer SS, Armstrong KA, Asch DA, Baron JA. Racial disparities in stage-specific colorectal cancer mortality: 1960–2005. American journal of public health, 2015;105(11):2199–2205.
Doubeni CA, Gabler NB, Wheeler CM, McCarthy AM, Castle PE, Halm EA, ... Wender RC. Timely follow-up of positive cancer screening results: A systematic review and recommendations from the PROSPR consortium. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2018;68(3):199–216.
Shavers VL, Brown ML. Racial and ethnic disparities in the receipt of cancer treatment. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2002;94(5):334–357.
Doubeni CA, Laiyemo AO, Major JM, Schootman M, Lian M, Park Y, Zauber AG. Socioeconomic status and the risk of colorectal cancer: an analysis of more than a half million adults in the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study. Cancer, 2013;119(23):4230–4236.
Sabatino SA, Lawrence B, Elder R, Mercer SL, Wilson KM, DeVinney B, ... Melillo S. Effectiveness of interventions to increase screening for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. American journal of preventive medicine, 2012;43(1):97–118.
Patel SS, Burns R, Shulman LN. Health disparities in the management of colorectal cancer in the United States: a national survey of oncologists. Journal of clinical oncology, 2016;34(22):2618–2625.
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.