Article Text

Download PDFPDF

1467 Selective targeting of integrins αVβ8 and αVβ1 within the dynamic ecosystem of pancreatic cancer to improve the overall anti-tumor response
  1. Diego Chacon Fajardo1,2,
  2. Chad L Moore1,
  3. Sean Porazinski1,2,
  4. Benjamin McLean1,2,
  5. Eve Borbilas1,
  6. Australian Pancreatic Cancer Genome Initiative3,
  7. Vishal Kothari4,
  8. Tim Machajewski4,
  9. Fernando Rock4,
  10. Scott M Turner4 and
  11. Marina Pajic1
  1. 1Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  2. 2University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  3. 3, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  4. 4Pliant Therapeutics, South San Francisco, CA, USA
  • Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer (JITC) preprint. The copyright holder for this preprint are the authors/funders, who have granted JITC permission to display the preprint. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.


Background Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) has a 5-year survival of less than 10% and remains the 3rd leading cause of cancer-related death in Western societies. New treatment options are urgently needed. We previously characterized molecular subsets of PDA, including fibrotic elements of the disease, associated with pre-clinical and clinical response to select tailored treatment strategies.1–4 TGF-β promotes stromal cell reprogramming, immunosuppression, and fibrinogenesis in cancers, including PDA.5 6 Integrins αVβ8 and αVβ1 are important activators of TGF-β signaling. Selective integrin blockade has recently emerged as a promising therapeutic approach to address TGF-β-mediated immunotherapy resistance, and improve anti-tumor response across cancer models.7–9 Here, we assessed the in vivo efficacy of PLN-101095, a dual selective small molecule inhibitor of αVβ8 and αVβ1, in well-annotated models of advanced PDA.

Methods We determined the pre-clinical efficacy of PLN-101095 in genetically-defined (LSL-KrasG12D/+; LSL-Trp53R172H/+; Pdx1-Cre (KPC), and Pan02) and genomically diverse patient-derived PDA xenograft models, testing clinically relevant combinations with standard of care (SoC) chemotherapy and anti-programmed death receptor-1 antibody (anti mPD-1), by monitoring tumor growth, metastasis, and animal survival. Mechanistic assessment of alterations in the tumor microenvironment (TME) was performed using comprehensive transcriptomic, immunohistochemical, and immunofluorescence approaches.

Results Single cell analysis of KPC pancreatic tumors revealed restricted expression of integrin αVβ8 (ITGB8) within the T-reg and NK cell subsets, while components of TGF-β signaling were more widely represented across cancer and stromal cell subsets. Dual targeting of αVβ8 and αVβ1 with PLN-101095 in this setting effectively reduced tumor growth (45% reduction in tumor weight compared with Vehicle; P=0.003) and significantly delayed disease progression in vivo (median OS Vehicle 29.5 days vs PLN-101095 45 days, P<0.0001). Of note, combining PLN-101095 with anti mPD-1 antibody further improved survival in this aggressive model of metastatic PDA (median OS anti mPD-1 33 days vs PLN-101095 + anti mPD-1 51 days, 22% CR; P<0.0001). In a second syngeneic model of PDA (Pan02), PLN-101095 in combination with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) significantly reduced tumor growth, TGF-β signaling, and fibrosis, while increasing CD8+ lymphocyte infiltration. Finally, utilizing patient-derived models of metastatic PDA revealed that PLN-101095 significantly blocked tumor growth, improved the response to SoC chemotherapy Gemcitabine/Abraxane, and reduced the number and size of lung metastases.

Conclusions These data demonstrate that PLN-101095 significantly enhances ICB or SoC chemotherapy response in advanced PDA models and provide scientific rationale for future combination studies testing PLN-101095 in pancreatic cancer.


  1. Waddell N, et al Nature 2015;518(7540):495

  2. Chou A, et al. Gut 2018;67(12):2142

  3. Vennin C, et al. Science Translational Medicine 2017;pii:eaai8504

  4. Murphy KJ, et al. Science Advances 2021;7(40):eabh0363

  5. Biffi G, et al. Cancer Discovery 2019;9(2):282

  6. Krishnamurty AT, et al. Nature 2022;611(7934):148

  7. Takasaka N, et al. JCI Insight 2018;3(20):e122591

  8. Dodagatta-Marri E, et al. Cell Reports 2021;36(1):109309

  9. Qiang L, et al. Gastroenterology 2023:S0016–5085(23)00809–0 [Online ahead of print]

Ethics Approval In vivo experiments were approved by the Garvan Institute of Medical Research/St Vincent’s Hospital Animal Ethics Committee (Animal Research Authority 21_30, 22_26). Patient samples and data were acquired through the Australian Pancreatic Genome Initiative (APGI)/International Cancer Genome Consortium (n=200), with ethics approval for the analyses of data and biological material under HREC X11–0220 (GHRP 1150).

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.