Article Text

Download PDFPDF

1499 Molecular and immune profiling of lobular-enriched versus non-lobular invasive breast cancers
  1. Kyle C Strickland1,2,
  2. Sarabjot Pabla3,
  3. Heidi Ko1,
  4. Rebecca A Previs1,2,
  5. Zachary D Wallen1,
  6. Mary K Nesline1,
  7. Shengle Zhang3,
  8. Jeffrey M Conroy3,
  9. Jennifer B Jackson4,
  10. Kamal S Saini5,
  11. Taylor J Jensen1,
  12. Brian Caveney6,
  13. Marcia Eisenberg6,
  14. Prasanth Reddy6,
  15. Eric A Severson1 and
  16. Shakti Ramkissoon1,7
  1. 1Labcorp Oncology, Durham, NC, USA
  2. 2Duke University Medical Center, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA
  3. 3OmniSeq, Labcorp Oncology, Buffalo, NY, USA
  4. 4Personal Genome Diagnostics, Labcorp Oncology, Baltimore, MD, USA
  5. 5Fortrea Inc., Durham, NC, USA
  6. 6Labcorp, Burlington, NC, USA
  7. 7Wake Forest Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA

Abstract

Background Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is a morphologically distinct endocrine-sensitive sub-type of invasive breast cancer. Invasive ductal carcinoma has been extensively characterized, however, the genomic and immune characteristics of ILC are relatively understudied. It is known that the vast majority of ILCs harbor alterations in CDH1, the gene encoding E-cadherin, but a more thorough understanding of the genomic and immune profiles of lobular-type carcinomas may provide insight into the underlying molecular mechanisms of tumorigenesis, metastasis, and potential therapeutic strategies to counter resistance mechanisms.

Methods We performed comprehensive genomic and immune profiling on 528 invasive breast cancers using panel-based next-generation DNA (523 genes) and RNA sequencing (55 genes for fusions/splice site variants, 395 for immune gene expression). PD-L1 expression was assessed by combined positive score (CPS) following 22C3 immunohistochemistry. Diagnostic and molecular pathology reports were reviewed by a board-certified anatomic pathologist for all tumors that harbored mutations in CDH1 or had a diagnosis of ILC from the test order to create a ’lobular-enriched’ (LE) cohort, which was compared to other non-lobular (NL) breast carcinomas, which included CDH1-mutated tumors diagnosed as ductal-type carcinomas. For each tumor, we determined immune-related expression signatures, including a tumor immunogenicity score (TIGS, 161 genes), a cellular proliferation signature (CP, 10 genes including Ki-67), and a cancer testis antigen burden score (CTAB, 21 genes). Differences between cohorts were assessed using the Mann-Whitney test.

Results The LE cohort contained 52 tumors (including 30 ILCs, 20 mammary carcinomas not otherwise specified, and 2 mammary carcinomas with lobular features), and the non-lobular (NL) cohort contained 476 cases (including 14 cases of CHD1-mutated ductal carcinomas). Compared to NL tumors, LE tumors were sequenced at advanced age (68.95 vs. 62.30 y, p<0.001), less likely to harbor a TP53 mutation (15.4% vs 54.2%, p<0.001) and had lower PD-L1 CPS (p<0.001). By RNAseq, LE tumors demonstrated significantly lower cellular proliferation (p=0.002), and lower CTAB (p<0.001) than NL tumors (figure 1). No differences were identified in TMB, TIGS, or proportion of ESR1 alterations.

Conclusions Our study demonstrates that the LE cohort exhibited distinct molecular and immunologic features from other breast cancers, including a lower frequency of TP53 alterations, lower PD-L1 expression, lower cellular proliferation, and lower expression of cancer testis antigens. Overall, these findings suggest striking differences in the cellular biology of ILCs but perhaps similar overall immune infiltration to other breast cancer subtypes, which may be important context to consider in future clinical studies.

Ethics Approval Ethics approval for this study was obtained from WCG IRB (Study #1340120), an independent institutional review board, including waiver of informed consent.

Abstract 1499 Figure 1

Demographics, genomic, and immune profiling results for lobular-enriched (LE) and and non-lobular (NL) breast cancer cohorts. The figures above illustrate comparisons fo (A) age (y). (B) PD-L1 CPS (score), (C) TMB (mut/Mb), and gene expression signatures for (D) tumor immunogeniciry (TIGS), (E) cellullar proliferation (CP), and (F) cancer testis antigen burden (CTAB)

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.