Article Text

Download PDFPDF

530 Clinicopathologic features and outcome of patients with microsatellite instable (MSI-H) cancer treated in a Phase I unit
  1. Edoardo Crimini1,2,
  2. Matteo Repetto2,3,4,
  3. Angela Esposito2,
  4. Carmen Belli5,
  5. Carmen Criscitiello2,3,
  6. Marzia Locatelli2,
  7. Ida Minchella2,
  8. Eleonora Nicolo’2,3,
  9. Luca Boscolo Bielo2,3,
  10. Grazia Castellano2,3,
  11. Gloria Pellizzari2,3,
  12. Stefania Morganti2,6,
  13. Pier Paolo Maria Berton Giachetti2,3,
  14. Gabriele Antonarelli2,3,
  15. Liliana Ascione2,3,
  16. Carmine Valenza2,3,
  17. Paolo Tarantino2,6,
  18. Beatrice Taurelli Salimbeni2 and
  19. Giuseppe Curigliano2,3
  1. 1Universitá Degli Studi Di Milano, Milano, Italy
  2. 2European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
  3. 3University of Milano, Milan, Italy
  4. 4Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
  5. 5IEO Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IRCCS, Milano, Italy
  6. 6Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
  • Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer (JITC) preprint. The copyright holder for this preprint are the authors/funders, who have granted JITC permission to display the preprint. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.


Background MSI-H derives from genomic hypermutability due to deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) function. dMMR can occur for epigenetic silencing or mutations in MMR genes, whose germline alteration cause Lynch syndrome (LS). Colorectal (CRC) and endometrial cancers (EC) more often have MSI-H, but various tumors can present this molecular feature. Immunotherapy demonstrated high efficacy in MSI-H advanced cancer, and pembrolizumab and dostarlimab gained agnostic approval for these patients by FDA.

Methods We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients that started a treatment in the Phase I Unit of the European Institute of Oncology between January 1st2014 and June 15th2023 to identify patients with MSI-H/dMMR tumors. We performed descriptive statistics and survival analysis. The study was approved by European Institute of Oncology Ethical Committee (Number UID 3560).

Results We identified 17 MSI-H patients enrolled in a phase I trial at our institution (table 1). The median age was 67.0 (range (R) 49–76) years; 11 were female and 6 male. Most frequent cancer types were CRC (6), and EC (4). The mean number of previous lines was 1.5. See table 1 for baseline characteristics of patients. All patients received various anti-PD1 monoclonal antibody (MAB) in clinical trials, 16 as monotherapy and 1 in combination with anti-LAG3 MAB + adenosine A2A receptor antagonist. Two patients had complete response, 9 patients had partial response (PR) and 1 had stable disease, with an objective response rate of 64.7% (figure 1). After a median follow-up of 38.8 months (R 0.2–70.7 months), 11 patients (64.7%) were alive and 7 (41.2%) did not experience disease progression. Median OS was not reached, and median PFS was 36.2 months. Three patients were affected by LS, 5 had sporadic MSI-H cancer and 9 were not tested for germline mutations. All patients with LS had still ongoing PR (mean 43.5 months). OS and PFS did not differ significantly (p-value 0.19 and 0.07, respectively) between patients with LS and the others (figure 2). Seven patients had at least one immune-related adverse event (irAE). Three patients discontinued the treatment due to G3 irAEs: rash (1 patient), pneumonitis (1) and myasthenia-like syndrome (1).

Conclusions Our analysis confirms the efficacy and the safety of anti-PD-(L)1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with MSI-H/dMMR tumors, irrespective of tumor histology and of the drug administered. Moreover, despite the little sample size, we report remarkable activity of anti-PD-(L)1 MABs in LS patients without signs of reduced efficacy when compared to patients with sporadic MSI-H tumors.

Abstract 530 Table 1

Baseline characteristics

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.