Article Text

Download PDFPDF

64 Augmenting low-plex multiplex imaging by leveraging the potential of same-slide H&E analysis
  1. Becky Arbiv1,
  2. Assaf Debby2,
  3. Nethanel Asher2,3,
  4. Guy Ben-Betzalel3,
  5. Ron Elran1,
  6. Pinchas Birnbaum1,
  7. Shai Bookstein1,
  8. Tal Dankovich1,
  9. Lena Tsabari1,
  10. Yuval Shachaf1,
  11. Yoad Cohen1,
  12. Amit Bart1,
  13. Oscar Puig1,
  14. Kenneth Bloom1,
  15. Ronnie Shapira-Frommer4,
  16. Iris Barshack2,5 and
  17. Ettai Markovits1
  1. 1Nucleai, Tel Aviv, Israel
  2. 2Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
  3. 3Ella Lemelbaum Institute for Immuno-Oncology, Ramat Gan, Israel
  4. 4Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
  5. 5Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer (JITC) preprint. The copyright holder for this preprint are the authors/funders, who have granted JITC permission to display the preprint. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

Abstract

Background Multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) is a powerful tool for tumor-microenvironment (TME) characterization. However, the adoption of high-plex panels in the clinical setting is limited due to cost and technical complexity. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining provides morphologic information about tissue structure and cellular composition but despite its use in routine pathology, its potential for extracting meaningful data in combination with mIF has been largely overlooked. We leveraged same-slide H&E and mIF images to enrich our analysis, enabling identification of known biomarkers, unidentifiable from low-plex mIF alone.

Methods We stained consecutive slides from 57 melanoma biopsies using two 6-plex immunofluorescence antibody panels and same-slide H&E staining. The panels consisted of markers for myeloid and tumor cells, with the first panel including T-cell markers (CD4, CD8) and the second panel composed of B-cell markers (CD20, CD38). Using a deep learning-based multiplex imaging analysis pipeline, we generated predictions for 6 cell types for each mIF panel. Simultaneously, deep learning models processed the H&E slides to detect and classify cells. The mIF and H&E slides were registered, and mIF marker-negative cells were reclassified based on their registered H&E cell type. Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) were annotated using markers from both panels and predicted using a model trained on T-cell panel data enhanced with cells from H&E.

Results Out of the 20 million cells detected in the B-cell panel, 9 million were successfully classified as tumor-, dendritic-, plasma-, or B-cells. However, a significant number of cells were classified as marker-negative cells. Integrating H&E cell typing, we reclassified 6 million cells as SOX10-negative tumor cells, fibroblasts, granulocytes, and non-B-lymphocytes. The non-B-lymphocytes, derived from H&E images, showed strong correlation with T-cell numbers identified by the T-cell mIF panel, enabling us to assess T-cell infiltration in the tumor invasive margin using the B-cell panel (figures 1 and 2). In the T-cell panel, we reclassified 5.5 million cells, including non-T-lymphocytes, which showed high correlation with B-cell numbers in the B-cell panel (figure 2). Leveraging these reclassified cells, we developed a TLS identification model, demonstrating 88% accuracy compared to mIF-based manual annotations (figure 3).

Conclusions Our analysis demonstrates the value of integrating same-slide H&E analysis in low-plex mIF studies. By leveraging the morphologic information provided by H&E slides, we were able to identify additional cells and accurately quantify known biomarkers for immunotherapy response, such as TLS and T-cell tumor infiltration, which were not identifiable otherwise.

Reference

  1. Markovits E, Dankovich T, Gluskin R, et al. A novel deep learning pipeline for cell typing and phenotypic marker quantification in multiplex imaging. bioRxiv doi:10.1101/2022.11.09.515776

Ethics Approval This single-center, retrospective study of medical records was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Sheba Medical Center (4387–17-SMC).

Abstract 64 Figure 1

Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes identified from B-cell panel using H&E enhancement (a) B-cell panel, (b) T-cell panel, (c) mlF with H&E enhanced cell type predictions, (d) H&E cell type predictions

Abstract 64 Figure 2

(a) Correlations between mlF detected T-cells from T-cell panel and non-B cell lymphocytes from the corresponding B-cell panel with H&E enhancement (b) Correlations between mlF detected B-cells from B-cell panel and non-T cell lymphocytes from the corresponding T-cell panel with H&E enhancement.

Abstract 64 Figure 3

TLS identification from T-cell panel using H&E enhancement. (a) T-cell panel, (b) B-cell panel, (c) mlF with H&E enhanced cell type predictions, (d) TLS model prediction

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.