Article Text

Download PDFPDF

698 Safety and tolerability of magrolimab in combination with taxanes in patients with solid tumors
  1. Oscar Juan-Videl1,
  2. Joanne Chiu2,
  3. Ulka N Vaishampayan3,
  4. Rohit Joshi4,
  5. Muhammad Furqan5,
  6. Natalie Rainey6,
  7. Bruno Fang7,
  8. William Lawler8,
  9. Brian Vicuna9,
  10. Wen Xu10,
  11. Jiang Shao11,
  12. Fadi Shihadeh11,
  13. Ann Chen11,
  14. Aoife Sills11,
  15. Estibaliz Lopez11 and
  16. Sylvia Adams12
  1. 1Hospital Universitari i Politècnic la Fe, Valencia, Spain
  2. 2University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
  3. 3University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
  4. 4Cancer Research SA, Adelaide, SA, Australia
  5. 5University of Iowa, Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
  6. 6Queensland Government – Cairns and Hinterland Hospital and Health Service, Queensland, QLD, Australia
  7. 7Astera Cancer Care, East Brunswick, NJ, USA
  8. 8St. Joseph Hospital, Fullerton, CA, USA
  9. 9Comprehensive Cancer Centers, Las Vegas, NV, USA
  10. 10Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
  11. 11Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA, USA
  12. 12Perlmutter Cancer Center of NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA

Abstract

Background Magrolimab is a monoclonal antibody that blocks the macrophage inhibitory immune checkpoint CD47, which is present on tumor cells. Overexpression of prophagocytic signals makes cells more susceptible to CD47 blockade. Taxanes are known to enhance expression of prophagocytic signals on tumor cells and therefore may synergize with magrolimab. These Phase 2 studies (ELEVATE TNBC: NCT04958785; ELEVATE Lung&UC: NCT04827576) are evaluating safety, tolerability, and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of magrolimab in combination with taxanes in locally advanced/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC), locally advanced/metastatic non-small cell/small cell lung cancers (mNSCLC/mSCLC), and locally advanced/metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) (figure 1). We report data from 2 safety run-ins (SRIs) from these studies.

Methods Patients with mTNBC in SRI1 received magrolimab and nanoparticle albumin-bound-paclitaxel or paclitaxel. Patients with mNSCLC/mSCLC or mUC in SRI2 received magrolimab+docetaxel. Magrolimab was started as a 1 mg/kg priming dose, followed by 30 mg/kg weekly (7 weeks in SRI1; 5 weeks in SRI2), and then a maintenance dose of 30 mg/kg Q2W for SRI1 and 60 mg/kg Q3W for SRI2. Chemotherapy was given per standard of care. Safety was assessed in patients who received ≥1 dose of any study drug. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were assessed in patients who experienced a DLT during the DLT evaluation period or did not experience a DLT and completed ≥3 (SRI1) or ≥2 (SRI2) magrolimab doses and ≥2 (SRI1) or ≥1 (SRI2) taxane doses. To select an RP2D, ≤2 of 6 DLT-evaluable patients could experience a DLT, or the magrolimab dose would be de-escalated and a new cohort assessed.

Results Six patients from each SRI were considered DLT-evaluable. The safety analysis population consisted of 8 and 9 patients in SRI1 and SRI2, respectively. No DLTs were observed during the DLT assessment period. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were observed in 8/8 (SRI1) and 9/9 (SRI2) patients (table 1). The most common TEAEs in SRI1 were anemia, vomiting, and headache (5/8 each); in SRI2, fatigue (5/9) and hyponatremia (3/9) were the most common. In SRI2, 2/9 patients experienced TEAEs resulting in discontinuation of magrolimab (fatal gastrointestinal bleed [deemed unrelated to treatment] and grade 3 neuritis). No additional deaths were reported.

Conclusions The observed safety profile was as expected based on the known toxicity profiles of the individual agents, and magrolimab appears tolerable in these combinations. No DLTs, magrolimab-related deaths, or unexpected safety signals were observed across indications. Magrolimab RP2D was determined at the initial dose level tested.

Trial Registration NCT04827576, NCT04958785

Ethics Approval The protocol and proposed informed consent form were reviewed and approved by all relevant Institutional Review Boards, Independent Ethics Committees and/or Research Ethics Boards prior to study commencement. There is no number provided as we did not receive one. Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part.

Consent The protocol and proposed informed consent form were reviewed and approved by all relevant Institutional Review Boards, Independent Ethics Committees and/or Research Ethics Boards prior to study commencement. There is no number provided as we did not receive one. Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part.

Abstract 698 Figure 1

ELEVATE TNBC and ELEVATE Lung&UC Study Design.

Abstract 698 Table 1

TEAEs occurring in ≥2 patients in either of the SRI cohorts.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.