Article Text

Download PDFPDF

706 First-in-human phase 2 clinical trial of multiplex combination intratumoral immunotherapy (MCII) in patients with metastatic solid cancer (Abscopal 5001 trial)
  1. David G Bostwick1,
  2. Melanie M Wilk1,
  3. Michael Cribbs2,
  4. Julie Linton2,
  5. Colleen E Ellis2,
  6. Brian R Bostwick1,
  7. Eugene C Rajaratnam3,
  8. Laura M Galeazzi3,
  9. Junqi Qian1,
  10. Peter M Rydesky2 and
  11. Peter J Littrup1
  1. 1Rampart Health, Orlando, FL, USA
  2. 2Ascension Providence Rochester Hospital, Rochester, MI, USA
  3. 3Antelope Valley Surgical Institute, Lancaster, CA, USA
  • Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer (JITC) preprint. The copyright holder for this preprint are the authors/funders, who have granted JITC permission to display the preprint. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.


Background Little is known of the synergy of combination intratumoral immunotherapy and ablation. We undertook a Phase 2 trial (Abscopal 5001) for patients with metastatic solid cancer (NCT04713371) to assess the safety and efficacy of cryoablation with concurrent injections of low-dose checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy, referred to as Multiplex Combination Intratumoral Immunotherapy (MCII).

Methods Twelve patients with metastatic cancer and one with sacral chordoma received at least one intratumoral treatment of MCII, preceded by 3–5 days of oral cyclophosphamide. MCII consisted of CT-guided cryoablation followed by intratumoral injection of ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, and cyclophosphamide. GM-CSF was subcutaneously administered daily for a total of 4 weeks. Treatment was repeated every 4–6 weeks if tumor burden remained stable or reduced as noted by iRECIST criteria. Criteria were modified when follow-up biopsies revealed pathology with minimal or no cancer despite persistent mass(es) on imaging.

Results Cancers included prostate (4 patients), sarcoma (2), and 1 each of breast, colon, bladder, uterine cervix, tongue, kidney, and sacral chordoma. Eight patients received at least 3 cycles of treatment, two received 2, and three received 1. All patients tolerated the outpatient procedure well and were discharged within 2 hours. Adverse event rate was 69%, all of which were Grade 1 or 2 except for one with delayed cryosurgical complication. At completion of up to 3 cycles of treatment. partial response (iPR) was observed in 5 patients (38.5%) and stable disease (iSD) in 5 (38.5%), for a disease control rate (iDCR) of 77%; progression was observed in 23%. Disparity between post-treatment imaging and pathologic findings was observed in 4 patients, requiring modification of the iRECIST criteria. Best response ranged from 0–91%, with a mean for responding patients of 38%. Injection site response was observed in 9 (69%), and distal abscopal effect was seen in 4 (31%), including one sarcoma patient with complete abscopal response of lung metastases. Biopsy-confirmed resolution of liver metastases was also noted in the bladder cancer patient. Patients are being followed to determine duration of response.

Conclusions MCII appears promising, providing 77% disease control rate with manageable, predominantly low-grade adverse events in patients with metastatic cancer. Modification of iRECIST criteria for intratumoral treatment is needed to redefine the primary treatment site response and accommodate disparities between imaging (positive) and pathologic findings (minimal or negative disease).

Trial Registration NCT04713371

Ethics Approval Ethics approval was granted by Institutional Review Board (Advarra, Columbia, MD; Pro 00045172). The study was also cleared by the US Food and Drug Administration (IND 151900). Each patient provided written informed consent prior to participation and prior to each treatment.

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.