Article Text

Download PDFPDF

609 A phase 1 clinical trial of GEN2, a personalizing gene vector immunotherapy, in combination with valganciclovir in adult patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or tumors metastatic to liver
  1. Priscilla Caguioa1,
  2. Maria Belen Tamayo2,
  3. John P Querol3,
  4. Necy S Juat4,
  5. Li Liu5,
  6. Allen Wang5,
  7. Joe McNulty5,
  8. Robert G Johnson5 and
  9. Alison L Hannah5
  1. 1St. Lukes Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines
  2. 2Makati Medical Center, Makati City, Philippines
  3. 3The Medical City Hospital, Pasig City, Philippines
  4. 4National Kidney and Transplant Institute, Manila, Philippines
  5. 5GenVivo, San Marino, CA, USA
  • Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer (JITC) preprint. The copyright holder for this preprint are the authors/funders, who have granted JITC permission to display the preprint. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

Abstract

Background GEN2 is a replication-incompetent gene transfer vector, containing an mRNA genome encoding for an optimized prodrug activated enzyme [enhanced mutant herpes simplex thymidine kinase (HSV-eTK)] and an immunostimulatory cytokine (GM-CSF). In the presence of the oral prodrug, valganciclovir (VGCV), HSV-eTK triggers tumor cell killing by releasing the patient’s full complement of unique tumor antigens, including neoantigens, to directly stimulate immune activation facilitated and augmented by the locally secreted immunostimulatory cytokine. GEN2 is off-the shelf without the need for tumor biopsies and genomic sequencing in order to generate personalized neoantigens.

Methods GEN2 in combination with VGCV was evaluated in a dose-escalating Phase 1 clinical trial in 61 adult patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or advanced solid tumors metastatic to liver (NCT04313868). Three routes of administration were investigated (data from the hepatic artery infusion and intratumoral cohort will be presented elsewhere). For the intravenous cohort (IV; n=48), GEN2 was given on Days 1/2/3 every 3 weeks with VGCV Days 8–12.

Results As of 16 April 2024, median age 59 years; 48% male, median KPS 90, 2 median prior therapies (range 0–9). The most common tumor type was HCC (n=19), followed by colon cancer (n=13) and breast cancer (BC; n=12). Drug exposure was a median of 3.5 cycles (range 1–28), with 13 cohorts tested over an 800-fold range (1.5 x105 – 1.2 x108 TU/kg). Two dose limiting toxicities were observed: drug hypersensitivity (HSR) in Cohort 3 and Grade 3 decreased appetite in Cohort 7. Common drug-related adverse events (AEs) included HSR (15%), abdominal pain, increased total bilirubin (both 10%), elevated AST, and decreased appetite (8%). No dose dependency for AEs was observed. Common Grade 3+ toxicities (all cause): anemia (13%), pneumonia (10%), elevated total bilirubin (10%) and elevated AST (6%). Plasma pharmacokinetics: rapid blood clearance with an elimination half-life of ~24 minutes. Linear relationship between dose:Cmax and dose:AUC0->inf was observed across the dosing range. Preliminary signs of clinical activity was observed in patients with HCC and hormone-receptor positive BC.

Conclusions GEN2 was well tolerated at all dose levels administered. A maximum tolerated dose was not defined. Although HSRs were observed at lower doses, improved manufacturing processes (with removal of animal proteins) led to substantial reduction of this toxicity. Signs of clinical activity (HCC and HR+ BC) were observed. A second phase 1 trial is exploring IV administration on a different schedule (NCT06391918) with expansion cohorts planned at the Recommended Phase 2 Dose.

Trial Registration NCT04313868.

Ethics Approval The study protocol and any accompanying material provided to the patient was reviewed and approved in writing by the following institutional review board/independent ethics committee: • National Kidney Transplant Institute Research Ethics Committee • Makati Medical Center Institutional Review Board • The Medical City Institutional Review Board • St. Luke’s Medical Center Institutional Ethics Review Committee • Manila Doctors Hospital Institutional Review Board The IRB/IECs were appropriately constituted and operated in accordance with the Integrated Addendum to ICH E6(R1): Guideline for Good Clinical Practice ICH E6(R2). Patients provided written informed consent before any study-specific tests or procedures were performed.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.