Article Text

Download PDFPDF

615 Intratumoral Fc-engineered agonistic CD40 antibody induces tumor rejection and systemic antitumor immunity in metastatic cancer patients. A bench-to-bedside and back approach
  1. Juan C Osorio1,2,
  2. David A Knorr2,
  3. Polina Weitzenfeld2,
  4. Ning Yao3,
  5. Maria Baez2,
  6. Meghan DiLillo2,
  7. Jahan Rahman1,
  8. Jacqueline Bromberg1,
  9. Michael Postow1,
  10. Charlotte Ariyan1,
  11. Mark Robson1 and
  12. Jeffrey V Ravetch2
  1. 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
  2. 2The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
  3. 3Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
  • Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer (JITC) preprint. The copyright holder for this preprint are the authors/funders, who have granted JITC permission to display the preprint. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

Abstract

Background Antibodies (Abs) agonizing the CD40 immune receptor hold promise for cancer treatment by activating anti-tumor immune responses.1–3 However, clinical implementation has been limited due to minimal on-target activity and significant toxicity.4–7 We previously investigated the bases if these issues and discovered that the interaction between the antibody (Ab) Fc domain and the inhibitory Fc-gamma receptor FcγRIIB is crucial for the in vivo activity of anti-CD40 antibodies, and that previous antibodies were not optimized for this interaction.8–10 To address this, we developed 2141 -V11, a human anti-CD40 Ab engineered to enhance FcγRIIB binding. In several tumor models, 2141-V11 enhanced dendritic cell (DC) activation and antigen-specific T cell responses, showing superior antitumor activity compared to other clinical CD40 Abs. Additionally, intratumoral administration of 2141-V11 reduced systemic toxicity associated with CD40 agonism and mediated abscopal responses in non-injected tumors.10–12 Here, we present the results of a first-in-human, phase 1 study,13 investigating the safety and preliminary clinical activity of intratumoral administration of 2141-V11 (NCT04059588), coupled with in vivo mechanistic studies in a humanized mouse model for CD40 and FcγRs (hCD40/hFcγR mice).

Methods Primary endpoints of the clinical trial included safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary objectives included preliminary clinical activity and correlative studies from biospecimens. Reverse translational studies were also performed in hCD40/hFcgR mice using a breast cancer model.

Results A total of 12 patients with metastatic solid tumors and identifiable metastatic lesions in the skin, amenable to intratumoral injection, were enrolled in the study. 2141-V11 was well-tolerated without dose-limiting toxicities, all treatment related adverse events were mild (Grade 1–2). In ten evaluable patients with metastatic cancer, the overall response rate was 20%, with complete responses in two patients (melanoma and hormone positive breast carcinoma) and stable disease in six patients (figure 1A). 2141-V11 induced tumor regression in both injected and non-injected lesions (figure 1B-C and figure 2), with increased leukocyte infiltration and tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) formation in post-treatment biopsies of complete responders (figure 3). In hCD40/hFcγR mice, 2141-V11 induced TLS formation in mice bearing orthotopic breast carcinoma, correlating with local and abscopal antitumor effects, systemic immune activation, and immune memory (figure 4).

Conclusions Intratumoral administration of 2141-V11 is safe and effective, warranting phase 2 studies that are currently ongoing. Correlative and in vivo studies suggest TLS formation as a unique mechanism of action for this Fc-enhanced immunotherapy.

Acknowledgements We acknowledge Jim Ackland for his consulting on regulatory affairs, and Dr. Sarah J. Schlesinger and Arlene Hurley for assisting with protocol updates and reports to the IRB. We thank the Pharmacy and Hospital staff, and of course the patients and families who contributed to this trial. We thank Carlo M. Sevilla and Alessandra E. Marino for their excellent technical assistance. We also thank all the members of the J.V.R. Laboratory of Molecular Genetics and Immunology for 804 helpful discussions and sharing experiment materials.

Trial Registration NCT04059588.

References

  1. Alexandroff AB, Jackson AM, Paterson T, Haley JL, Ross JA, Longo DL, Murphy WJ, James K, Taub DD. Role for CD40-CD40 ligand interactions in the immune response to solid tumours. Mol Immunol 2000;37:515–26. doi: 10.1016/s0161-5890(00)00079-1.

  2. Beatty GL, Chiorean EG, Fishman MP, et al. CD40 agonists alter tumor stroma and show efficacy against pancreatic carcinoma in mice and humans. Science 2011;331:1612–6. doi: 10.1126/science.1198443.

  3. Beatty GL, Li Y, Long KB. Cancer immunotherapy: activating innate and adaptive immunity through CD40 agonists. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2017;17:175–86. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2017.1270208.

  4. Chowdhury F, Johnson PW, Glennie MJ, Williams AP. Ex vivo assays of dendritic cell activation and cytokine profiles as predictors of in vivo effects in an anti-human CD40 monoclonal antibody ChiLob 7/4 phase I trial. Cancer Immunol Res 2014;2:229–40. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-13-0070.

  5. Furman RR, Forero-Torres A, Shustov A, Drachman JG. A phase I study of dacetuzumab (SGN-40, a humanized anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody) in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma 2010;51:228–35. doi: 10.3109/10428190903440946.

  6. Irenaeus SMM, Nielsen D, Ellmark P, et al. First-in-human study with intratumoral administration of a CD40 agonistic antibody, ADC-1013, in advanced solid malignancies. Int J Cancer 2019;145:1189–99. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32141.

  7. Bajor DL, Mick R, Riese MJ, et al. Long-term outcomes of a phase I study of agonist CD40 antibody and CTLA-4 blockade in patients with metastatic melanoma. Oncoimmunology 2018;7:e1468956. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2018.1468956.

  8. Li F, Ravetch JV. Inhibitory Fcgamma receptor engagement drives adjuvant and anti-tumor activities of agonistic CD40 antibodies. Science 2011;333:1030–4. doi: 10.1126/science.1206954.

  9. Li F, Ravetch JV. Antitumor activities of agonistic anti-TNFR antibodies require differential FcgammaRIIB coengagement in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013;110:19501–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319502110.

  10. Knorr DA, Dahan R, Ravetch JV. Toxicity of an Fc-engineered anti-CD40 antibody is abrogated by intratumoral injection and results in durable antitumor immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018;115:11048–53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1810566115.

  11. Dahan R, Barnhart BC, Li F, Yamniuk AP, Korman AJ, Ravetch JV. Therapeutic activity of agonistic, human anti-CD40 monoclonal antibodies requires selective FcgammaR engagement. Cancer Cell 2016;29:820–31. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2016.05.001.

  12. Garris CS, Wong JL, Ravetch JV, Knorr DA. Dendritic cell targeting with Fc-enhanced CD40 antibody agonists induces durable antitumor immunity in humanized mouse models of bladder cancer. Sci Transl Med 2021;13. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abd1346.

  13. Osorio J, Knorr D, Weitzenfeld P, et al. Intratumoral Fc-optimized agonistic CD40 antibody induces tumor rejection and systemic antitumor immunity in patients with metastatic cancer. Res Sq 2024. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4244833/v1.

Ethics Approval Studies were approved by the institutional review board (IRB) of the Rockefeller University (DKN-0993).

Abstract 615 Figure 1

Preliminary clinical activity of 2141-V11. Waterfall plot displaying best percent change from baseline in sum of lesion diameters (SoD). a) Best overall response; b) Injected target lesions; c) Non-injected target lesions

Abstract 615 Figure 2

Induction of tumor shrinkage in remote sites, in complete responders to 2141-V11. Representative photographs of the lesions from responders a) Melanoma patient; b) Breast cancer patient. Injected (red arrows) and non-injected target lesions (green arrows) are indicated. c-d) Radiographic and cancer markers from breast ca. patient

Abstract 615 Figure 3

Formation of tertiary lymphoid structures in complete responders to 2141-V11. a-b) Representative images of H&E stained slides of tumor samples from two responding patients. c-d) IHC of FFPE sections after treatment with 2141-V11. e-f) Representative mIF images from responding patients. g-i) Quantification of TLS & immune cells

Abstract 615 Figure 4

Intratumoral administration of 2141-V11 leads to antitumor immunity, resulting in primary tumor regression, an abscopal effect, and induction of long-term immune memory. a-b) Scheme and results of experiment showing antitumor effect of 2141-V11 in orthotopic breast cancer model. c-d) Scheme and results of rechallenge experiment with 2141-V11. d) Representative image and results of abscopal effect of 2141-V11

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.