Background The monoclonal antibody (mAb) trastuzumab is part of the standard of care for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-overexpressing breast cancer. Antibody-dependent cell-mediated phagocytosis (ADCP) and cytotoxicity (ADCC) are major mechanisms of action of the mAb trastuzumab. Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi), such as valproic acid (VPA) or vorinostat (SAHA), exert several immunostimulatory properties, which contribute at least in part to their anticancer effect. However, the impact of HDACi-induced immunostimulatory effects on trastuzumab-mediated anti-tumor immune response is not well characterized.
Methods We analyzed the ADCP and ADCC activity of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from age and gender-matched healthy volunteers (n=5) against HDACi-treated HER2-overexpressing breast cancer cells (SKBR3), using a well-established in vitro three-color imaging flow cytometry and flow cytometry approach.
Results VPA and SAHA enhanced trastuzumab-mediated ADCP and trastuzumab-independent cytotoxicity. Mechanistically, VPA upregulated the activating antibody-binding receptor Fc-gamma receptor (FcγR) IIA (CD32A) on monocytes (CD14+). Moreover, VPA and SAHA downregulated the anti-apoptotic protein myeloid leukemia cell differentiation 1 (MCL1) in breast cancer cells. Additionally, VPA and SAHA induced an immunogenic cell death, characterized by the exposure of calreticulin (CALR), as well as decreased the “do not eat me” signal CD47 on tumor cells.
Conclusions HDACi VPA and SAHA increase trastuzumab-mediated phagocytosis and trastuzumab-independent cytotoxicity. The immunomodulatory activities of those HDACi support a rationale combined treatment approach with mAb for cancer treatment.
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatment, has evolved as a valuable approach in various types of human solid malignancies. In particular, trastuzumab, targeting the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), has become the standard of care treatment for women with HER2-overexpressing breast cancer.1 2 Trastuzumab has multiple direct and indirect anti-tumor effects, such as the inhibition of cell survival and proliferation.3–5 Several studies further highlighted antibody-dependent cell-mediated phagocytosis (ADCP) and cytotoxicity (ADCC) as major mechanisms of action for most mAb, such as trastuzumab.6 7 Although HER2-overexpressing breast cancer patients benefit from trastuzumab treatment, response rates only range between 19% and 26% when administered as monotherapy.8 9 A better understanding of trastuzumab’s molecular mechanisms could lead to the development of a more rational combination treatment approach, which would improve patient outcome.
In this line, histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) represent a new class of targeted anti-cancer therapeutics, which have different effects, such as induction of apoptosis or autophagic cell death.10 11 These agents selectively inhibit the activity of histone deacetylases (HDACs), and thereby, alter gene transcription by unbalancing the acetylation of histones and other proteins. HDACi can reverse epigenetic abnormalities that are associated with carcinogenesis and thereby reboot intrinsic anti-tumor responses, such as cell cycle arrest and cell differentiation in vitro.12–14 Additionally, HDACi (panobinostat) have been found to engage the immune system and contribute to an effective anti-tumor response in murine models.15 16 Furthermore, cancer cell treatment with HDACi has been shown to enhance their susceptibility to natural killer (NK) cell cytotoxicity or dendritic cell (DC) phagocytosis in vivo.17–19 These immunostimulatory properties may improve the host’s immune responses and clinical outcomes of immunotherapies, such as trastuzumab treatment.
It has been suggested that HDACi have additive or synergistic treatment effects in combination with the mAb trastuzumab in vitro.20–22 These data have been generated on cell lines in the absence of immune cells. However, murine models using xenografts indicated that the synergistic effect of the HDACi panobinostat and trastuzumab is based on the activation of NK cells, supporting the idea that HDACi-induced immunomodulation is essential for its therapeutic effect.15 The combination of trastuzumab with the HDACi vorinostat, also known as suberanilohydroxamic acid (SAHA), has even been taken into a phase I/II clinical trial for HER2-overexpressing breast cancer patients.23 Thus, despite promising preclinical and clinical data, the impact of HDACi on the trastuzumab-mediated human immune response on a functional level is currently not fully understood.
Therefore, we investigated the influence of two different HDACi, SAHA and valproic acid (VPA), on human trastuzumab-mediated ADCP and ADCC, by the use of a well-established in vitro three-color flow cytometry (FCM) approach. Strikingly, VPA and SAHA enhanced trastuzumab-mediated ADCP and trastuzumab-independent cytotoxicity. To elucidate the molecular mechanism of this synergistic effect, we evaluated the impact of molecules, which appear relevant for antibody-mediated immunogenic cell death. In this line, we focused on (i) myeloid leukemia cell differentiation protein 1 (MCL1), as anti-apoptotic protein, which has been shown inhibit ADCC24 and being modulated by HADCi13; (ii) the expression of antibody-binding Fc-gamma receptor (FcγR) subtypes, which either mediate activation or suppression of the respective immune cell25; (iii) CD47, a receptor, which suppresses phagocytosis and acts as a checkpoint molecule on antigen-presenting cells26; and (iv) calreticulin (CALR), a molecules, which acts as a key molecule for immunogenic cell death.27
The human female breast adenocarcinoma cell line SKBR3 (ATCC, Manasses, Virginia, USA), which overexpresses the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), was maintained in RPMI 1640 Medium GlutaMAX Supplement (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, Massachusetts, USA), supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated (hi) fetal calf serum (FCS; Linaris, Wertheim-Bettingen, GER). Cells were incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidified environment.
Trastuzumab (Herceptin) was provided by the institutional pharmacy (Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna). VPA (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA) was dissolved in Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline without calcium and magnesium (DPBS −/−; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.). Vorinostat (Zolinza), also known as suberanilohydroxamic acid (SAHA; Selleckchem, Munich, GER) was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.).
VPA and SAHA titration
SKBR3 cells were treated with either VPA or SAHA at different concentrations (online supplementary figure S1a, b), collected after 24 hours (h), washed with DPBS −/− and subsequently stained with the FITC Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit I (BD Pharmingen, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA), according to manufacturer’s protocol. Subsequently, cells were measured by a Gallios G flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter Inc., Brea, California, USA), and further analyzed with Kaluza analysis software (V.2.1.1; Beckman Coulter Inc.). Viable cells were determined as Annexin V and propidium iodide (PI) double negative (Annexin V−/PI−), early apoptotic cells as Annexin V positive and PI negative (Annexin V+/PI−) and end-stage apoptotic dead cells as Annexin V and PI double positive (Annexin V+/PI+).
Isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)
Peripheral blood (27 mL) was drawn into VACUETTE EDTA tubes (Greiner Bio-One International, Kremsmuenster, Upper Austria, AUT) from sex-matched and aged-matched healthy volunteers (n=5). PBMCs were immediately isolated using Ficoll-Paque gradient centrifugation (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden). PBMCs were washed twice with DPBS −/− and further resuspended in RPMI 1640 Medium GlutaMAX supplemented with 10% FCS.
Target cell staining and pretreatment with VPA or SAHA
SKBR3 cells were trypsinized (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) and resuspended in DPBS −/− to a concentration of 5×107/mL. The cells were further incubated with 1 µL of 0.5 mM carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE; Invitrogen, Eugene, Oregon, USA) per 1×106 cells for 10 min (min) at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere. Afterwards cells were washed in RPMI 1640 Medium GlutaMAX supplemented with 10% FCS and resuspended to a concentration of 5×105/mL. The cells (200 µL) were further put into 5 mL tubes (BD Falcon) and treated either with 5 mM VPA, 10 mM VPA, 5 µM SAHA,10 μM SAHA or left untreated for 24 hours at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidified environment.
Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity phagocytosis (ADCP) and cytotoxicity (ADCC) assay
ADCP and ADCC activities were measured as previously described.28–30 Briefly, freshly isolated PBMCs were resuspended in RMPI 1640 supplemented with 10% FCS to the concentration of 12.5×106/mL or 6.25×106/mL. PBMCs (200 µL) were added to the CFSE-labeled and HDACi-pretreated SKBR3 cells, resulting in an effector to target (E:T) ratio of 25:1 or 12.5:1 (total reaction volume 400 µL). The cells were incubated together for 2.5 hours at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidified environment in the presence or absence of trastuzumab at a concentration of 2.5 µg/mL (figure 1).
Afterwards, the cells were washed in DPBS −/− and stained using Zombie Violet Fixable Viability Kit (BioLegend, San Diego, California, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Next, the cells were washed with DPBS −/− supplemented with 2% hi FCS and stained with anti-human CD14 allophycocyanin (APC) for 30 min at 4°C.
Staining events were quantified by a Gallios G flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter Inc.) or Amnis ImageStreamXMark II imaging flow cytometer (IFC; Luminex Corporation, Austin, Texas, USA) and further analyzed with Kaluza Analysis Software V.2.1.1 (Beckman Coulter Inc.) or IDEAS software (Luminex Corporation).
CFSE and CD14 APC double-positive cells (CFSE+/CD14+) are phagocytosed cells by ADCP (figure 2A–C), whereas CFSE and Zombie Violet double-positive cells (CFSE+/Zombie Violet+) were classified as lysed cells by ADCC (online supplementary figure S2a-c). ADCP and ADCC events are given as a percentage of all CFSE-positive tumor cells.
For the VPA or SAHA-induced secretome experiments, SKBR3 cells were treated with VPA or SAHA, for 24 hours. Afterwards PBMCs were stimulated with the VPA or SAHA-induced secretome (supernatant) of SKBR3 cells for 12 hours, following the ADCP/ADCC assay as described previously.
Analysis of HER2, CALR, CD47 and MCL1 expression in SKBR3 cells
SKBR3 cells were treated with different VPA and SAHA concentrations as described previously. The cells were further incubated with primary antibodies for HER2, CALR, CD47 or MCL1 (online supplementary table S1) for 30 min at 4°C. Unconjugated antibodies were further stained with secondary antibodies for 30 min at 4°C (online supplementary table S1). In the case of an intracellular protein staining, the cells were fixed and permeabilized with the IntraPrep Permeabilizaton Reagent (Beckman Coulter Inc.) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Different protein expression levels were analyzed by the use of a Gallios G flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter Inc.) and quantified with Kaluza Analysis Software V.2.1.1 (Beckman Coulter Inc.). Histogram overlays were created with FlowJo V.10.6.1 (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA).
Analysis of FcγR expression on monocytes
FcγRI (CD64), FcγRIIA (CD32A), FcγRIIB (CD32B) and FcγRIII (CD16) expressions on monocytes (CD16+) were measured after the 2.5-hour incubation time of the ADCC/ADCP assay, without prior CFSE labeling of SKBR3 cells and without trastuzumab. As CD32A and CD32B can only be distinguished on their intracellular domain, the cells were fixed and permeabilized with the IntraPrep Permeabilizaton Reagent (Beckman Coulter) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The cells were incubated with primary antibodies (online supplementary table S1) for 30 min at 4°C. Unconjugated antibodies were further stained with secondary antibodies for 30 min at 4°C (online supplementary table S1). FcγR expression levels were analyzed using a Gallios G flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter Inc.) and quantified with Kaluza Analysis Software V.2.1.1 (Beckman Coulter Inc.). Histogram overlays were created with FlowJo V.10.6.1 (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA).
MCL1 knockdown in SKBR3 cells
SKBR3 cells (1×106) were seeded on 6-well plates. For transfection, the cells were cultured in Opti-MEM Reduced Serum Media (Invitrogen) and the cells were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Test groups were transfected with MCL1 small interfering RNA (siRNA; sc-35877; Santa Cruz, Texas, USA), whereas control groups were transfected with AllStars Negative Control siRNA (Quiagen, Hilden, North Rhine-Westphalia, GER). The medium was exchanged to SKBR3 medium 6 hours after transfection. The cells were further cultivated for 24 hours before being used in the ADCP/ADCC assay as described before.
Statistical tests and graphs were performed with GraphPad Prism 7.0a (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, California, USA). The assessment of agreement between FCM and IFC results was done by Bland-Altman plots.31 All other activities or expression data are presented by scatter plots (circles, boxes and triangles demonstrate individual values) and corresponding mean (long horizontal line) and SD or SE of the mean (SEM). Comparisons for ADCP/ADCC and FcγR results were investigated by a repeated-measures (RM) one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Fisher least significant difference (LSD) post hoc tests. All other comparisons were calculated by a one-way ANOVA and Fisher LSD post hoc tests. Two-sided p values ≤0.05 were regarded as statistically significant.
ADCP and ADCC measured by FCM detects true phagocytic events and is comparable with IFC
In order to investigate ADCP and ADCC, we used an FCM-based approach, which facilitates high throughput data acquisition (online supplementary figure S1). We first determined the reliability of FCM to measure accurate ADCP and ADCC events, in terms of truly phagocytosed/incorporated cells in our setting. In this line, we compared each sample with IFC and conventional FCM, despite considering that both methods rely on different technologies (imaging vs quantification of optical parameters) and different data output. Analysis of ADCP (CFSE+/CD14+) and ADCC (CFSE+/ Zombie Violet+) images show truly phagocytosed and lysed cells, respectively (figure 1a–c; online supplementary figure S3a-c).
Data agreement between the two different methods (IFC vs FCM) was further investigated by Bland-Altman plots. For ADCP, the bias (average of the differences) between IFC and FCM measured values was 0.983 and corresponding 95% limits of agreement ranged from −2.822 to 4.789 (figure 2d). ADCC comparison resulted in a bias of 0.213 and its associated 95% limits of agreement from −6.396 to 6.823 (online supplementary figure S3d). We further conducted a Pearson’s correlation (scatter plots not shown) for ADCP (r=0.991; p<0.001) and ADCC (r=0.857; p<0.001). Taking together, measurement of ADCP and ADCC by FCM detects true phagocytic events and is comparable with IFC.
Valproic acid and vorinostat enhance trastuzumab-mediated ADCP and trastuzumab-independent cytotoxicity
In order to investigate a potential additive or synergistic immunomodulatory effect of valproic acid (VPA) or vorinostat (SAHA) on ADCP or ADCC activity, we performed an ADCP/ADCC assay as shown in the online supplementary figure S1.
We intended to induce limited tumor cell stress that would result in approximately 75% tumor cell survival. We applied sublethal doses of 5 and 10 mM VPA and 5 and 10 µM SAHA, respectively, for 24 hours, which resulted in about 25% early apoptotic tumor cells (online supplementary figure S2).
Strikingly, trastuzumab-mediated ADCP activity was significantly improved by VPA (p<0.01; figure 2A) and SAHA (p<0.01; figure 2B) pretreatment. In contrast, VPA or SAHA alone did not enhance phagocytosis compared with untreated tumor cells (online supplementary figure S4a-b). However, the trastuzumab-enhancing effect was not seen at a lower (12:1) E:T ratio (online supplementary figure S4c-f).
In contrast to ADCP, trastuzumab-independent cytotoxicity was significantly enhanced by VPA (p<0.05; figure 3A) and SAHA (p<0.05; figure 3B). The addition of trastuzumab however did not affect ADCC compared with untreated tumor cells (online supplementary figure S5a-b). Corresponding to the ADCP results, there was also no enhancing effect observed at an E:T ratio of 12:1 (online supplementary figure S5c-f).
Valproic acid tumor cell treatment increases activating FcγRIIA expression on monocytes
To examine mechanistic effects of VPA or SAHA tumor cell pretreatment on trastuzumab-enhanced ADCP activity, we first investigated potential expression changes of our target receptor HER2. Interestingly, VPA and SAHA lead to a decreased protein expression level compared with untreated tumor cells (p<0.05; online supplementary figure S6a-b).
Next, we examined the different antibody-meditating receptors on monocytes (CD14+). We performed the ADCP/ADCC assay as described above and stained for FcγRI (CD64), FcγRIIA (CD32A), FcγRIIB (CD32B) and FcγRIII (CD16) expression on CD14 +cells (figure 4A–D). Protein expression analysis using FCM revealed a statistically significant upregulation of the activating FcγRIIA by VPA (p<0.01; figure 4B). All other FcγR were not affected by VPA. SAHA had no impact on any FcγR.
Valproic acid and vorinostat decrease anti-apoptotic molecule MCL1 in tumor cells
To get a deeper understanding of how VPA and SAHA affect ADCP activity, we examined the major anti-apoptotic molecule MCL1. MCL1 protein expression was significantly downregulated by VPA and SAHA (p<0.001; p<0.001; figure 5A). To investigate whether this effect is MCL1 dependent, we knocked-down MCL1 by siRNA (figure 5B) and repeated the ADCP/ADCC assay in the absence of HDACi pretreatment (figure 5C). Strikingly, ADCP activity was significantly enhanced in comparison with untreated controls (p<0.05). Notably, this effect was only seen in combination with the antibody trastuzumab (online supplementary figure S7a). However, ADCC was not affected by MCL1 knockdown, neither with nor without trastuzumab (online supplementary figure S7b, c).
Valproic acid and vorinostat induce an immunogenic cell death (ICD) and downregulates anti-phagocytic CD47 in tumor cells
As VPA and SAHA enhance trastuzumab-independent cytotoxicity, we further investigated if this observation might be explained by the induction of a so-called ICD, which is in part characterized by the surface exposure of CALR, which is counterbalanced by the “do not eat me” signal CD47.27 32
FCM analysis revealed a statistically significant upregulation of CALR surface exposure by VPA (p<0.001; figure 6A) and SAHA (p<0.05; figure 6B), respectively. Moreover, the “do not eat me” signal CD47 was also downregulated on SKBR3 cells by both HDACi, VPA and SAHA (p<0.001; figure 6C; p<0.001, figure 6D).
Next, we investigated the potential immunostimulatory effects of the HDACi-induced secretome. We stimulated effector cells (PBMCs) with VPA or SAHA-induced secretome of tumor cells for 12 hours prior to the ADCP/ADCC assay. However, neither ADCP nor ADCC, with or without trastuzumab showed enhanced ADCP/ADCC activity compared the tumor cell secretome of untreated cells (online supplementary figure S8a-h).
Recent data provided evidence that epigenetic remodeling by the use of HDACi in combination with other targeted therapies, such as the mAb trastuzumab, is capable of engaging and enhancing an effective anti-tumor immune response.15 16 However, apart of safety, tolerability and the effectiveness of trastuzumab-combined HDACi treatments in vivo, its effect on the immune system, especially on a functional level, remain to be elucidated.33 In this study, we investigated the influence of the Food and Drug Administration-approved HDACi, VPA and SAHA on PBMCs effector function in vitro. By the use of a functional immune cell approach, we could demonstrate that both VPA and SAHA enhanced trastuzumab-mediated ADCP activity. In contrast, VPA or SAHA had no effect on the trastuzumab-independent phagocytic killing of tumor cells. This finding might not be very surprising as monocytes are in generally incapable of distinguishing between self and non-self without toll-like receptors, complement or antibody mediation. As the overall functional read-out (ADCP) was increased, we did further investigations in a systematic approach. First, we explored potential changes in trastuzumab’s target (HER2). Although the expression of HER2 on target cells is essential for the binding of trastuzumab, the level of HER2 positivity does not influence the extent of ADCP, as both HDACi decreased HER2 surface expression. This is in line with data gained in human studies, which demonstrates that if HER2 is overexpressed, defined by immunohistochemistry staining degree of 3+ or a HER2/chromosome 17 fluorescence in situ hybridisation ratio of ≥2.0, then the degree of positivity of HER2 expression has no major influence on the clinical outcome.34–37 Correspondingly, another study revealed that HER2-non-amplified cancer cell lines are still highly susceptible to trastuzumab-mediated cell killing, whereas HER2-non-expressing cell lines are not.38 However, the extent of response does not necessarily depend on overall HER2 expression.
We used an FCM-based evaluation for ADCC and ADCP activity, a technique that is also suitable for clinical analysis of larg patient cohorts.30 A potential uncertainty of this technique is false-positive ADCP events, in terms of true engulfed tumor cells by monocytes. In contrast, IFC provides high-resolution images at the single-cell level, which is particularly advantageous when analyzing cellular interactions, such as ADCP activity in vitro. However, this technique is time-consuming and may be impractical when measuring large sample sizes. The comparability and reliability of FCM in comparison with IFC, in terms of true ADCP events, have not been assessed yet. Therefore, we adapted the conventional FCM ADCP/ADCC assays for an IFC device.28–30 39 We demonstrate that conventional FCM detects true phagocytic and cytotoxic single-cell events and is comparable with IFC. Taking this matter of fact into account, as well as the more practicability of FCM compared with IFC, we kept using the conventional FCM approach for our ADCP/ADCC assay.
As the level of HER2 positivity has no influence on ADCP activity, we next investigated potential changes and influence on trastuzumab’s effector side (FcγR). In this line, murine data demonstrated the importance of the interaction between FcγRs and trastuzumab for an optimal anti-tumor immune response in vivo.6 40 FcγRIIA (CD32A) plays an essential role in the mediation of an effective ADCP activity. Strikingly, VPA treatment upregulates FcγRIIA expression on monocytes (CD14+), whereas SAHA had no effect on any FcγR. Accordingly, antibody engineering with enhanced binding affinity to FcγRIIA has been shown to increase macrophage-mediated phagocytosis.41 42 These data highlight a potential synergistic effect of antibodies with optimized binding affinity and FcγR upregulation by epigenetic remolding of VPA.
In contrast to ADCP, ADCC seems to be unaffected by any HDACi treatment. This finding could be explained by the lack of FcγRIII (CD16) upregulation, which is the main antibody-mediating receptor of NK cells. Strikingly, trastuzumab-independent cytotoxicity is significantly enhanced by both HDACi, VPA and SAHA.
As resistance to spontaneous or therapy-induced cell death is as major hallmark of cancer,43 we further examined a possible effect on cancer cell-intrinsic resistance to immune cell-mediated cell death. The so-called apoptotic trigger is meticulously controlled by proapoptotic and anti-apoptotic proteins. Tumor cells can circumvent cell death by increasing the expression of anti-apoptotic regulators, such as MCL1. Therefore, we investigated potential counterbalancing effects of VPA and SAHA on MCL1 protein expression. Tumor cell treatment with VPA or SAHA resulted in a downregulation of MCL1 protein expression. To further investigate whether the enhanced ADCP effect of VPA is MCL1 dependent, we knocked-down MCL1 by the use of siRNA. MCL1 knockdown alone without any HDACi treatment resulted in an enhanced ADCP activity. Along this line, trastuzumab itself seems to have an intrinsic ability to reduce MCL1 expression.44 The inhibition of anti-apoptotic proteins, such as MCL1, might be especially effective in cancer cells with rat sarcoma mutations as they have an upregulated anti-apoptotic signaling cascade.24
Due to the enhanced trastuzumab-independent cytotoxicity, we further investigated the potential induction of immunogenic cell death (CALR) and its counterplayers (CD47) as a “do not eat me” signal. Both HDACi treatments resulted in a cell surface exposure of CALR, which serves as a surrogate marker for an endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response. At the same time, the CALR counterbalancing “do not eat me” signal CD47 has been also downregulated. This finding underlines the importance of a rational combined treatment approach with immunological stimulatory properties, as CD47 is a major inhibitor of an ICD-induced effective anti-tumor immune response.45 46 Moreover, VPA and SAHA might be of major interest when combined with other targeted therapies or immune-checkpoint-blocking antibodies.47 48
As the induction of an ICD is often linked to the secretion of a variety of immunostimulatory signals, we assessed the potential effects of the HDACi-induced secretome on a functional level. Surprisingly, in the HDACi-induced secretome of cancer cells showed no enhancing effect on neither ADCP nor ADCC activity underscoring the relevance of drug-induced direct modulation of cell signaling.
It should be noted that the two different HDACi used in the present study (SAHA and VPA) act on different HDACs enzymes. In particular, SAHA inhibits HDACs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10,49 whereas VPA acts only on HDACs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7.50 We suggest that this is the reason for the differential treatment effects, such as enhanced FcγRIIA expression, which were only seen for VPA but not SAHA. On the other hand, SAHA downregulated the anti-apoptotic protein MCL1 more potently compared with VPA (p<0.05), which might serve as an explanation why the overall ADCP activity still gets statistically significantly upregulated by SAHA, besides the lack of FcγRIIA upregulation.
In conclusion, the immunomodulatory activities of HDACi (VPA and SAHA) support a rationale combined treatment approach with trastuzumab for breast cancer treatment. Our data provide a rational concept to design a clinical study, which combines HADCi and anti-HER2 antibodies. Certainly, such a study might not be restricted to low-risk breast cancer patients eligible for anti-HER2 monotherapy (trastuzumab) but might also include high-risk breast cancer patient suffering from nodal-positive (N+) and estrogen receptor-negative (ER−) tumors, who are currently advised to receive a dual anti-HER2 treatment (trastuzumab and pertuzumab).51
Our data suggest that the immune system plays a key role in the mechanism underlying HDACi-mediated ADCP enhancement. The enhanced trastuzumab-mediated phagocytosis and trastuzumab-independent cytotoxicity is a result of the multimodal HDACi treatment effect, which induces a bona fide ICD, enhances susceptibility to phagocytosis and apoptosis, as well as increases antibody-mediating receptor expression.
The authors would like to thank Andreas Spittler (Core Facility Flow Cytometry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria) for his expert help with the Imaging Flow Cytometry.
Contributors JL and MB: the study. LH, JK, JH and SP: performed the experiments. GE: provided experimental resources and knowledge. JL: calculated the statistics; drew the data figures and tables;
wrote the manuscript. JL, JK and MB: interpreted the results. LH and JK: drew the vector graphics. JL, LH JK, GE and MB: edited the manuscript. JL and MB: supervised the study. All authors approved the latest version of the manuscript.
Funding This study was supported in part by research funds of Medical University of Vienna, as well as a personal research fund of the “Fellinger Cancer Research” (granted to JL).
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Ethics approval This study was carried out in consensus with “Good Scientific Practice Guidelines” of the Medical University of Vienna, as well as the latest “Declaration of Helsinki”. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the “Ethics Committee” of the Medical University of Vienna (#1374/2014).
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data availability statement All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.