Statistics from Altmetric.com
The occurrence of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is significant, with an estimated 40,000 cases diagnosed in US women each year (American Cancer Society, 2018). TNBC is a vastly heterogeneous disease that are grouped together histologically since they lack hormone and Her-2 receptors. However, TNBC is best considered as an umbrella term, encompassing a wide spectrum of entities with distinct genetic, transcriptional, histological and clinical differences.1–3 As a group, TNBC is associated with high proliferation, early recurrence and poor survival rates.2 4 This aggressive disease is resistant to widely used targeted therapies such as trastuzumab and endocrine therapies, which have been effective at reducing breast cancer mortality. The best chance for survival is early detection, followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and surgical resection.5 Patients with early-stage TNBC have increased rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) after NAC compared with other breast cancer subtypes. Indeed, the best prognostic factor for TNBC is the patient’s response to NAC. However, the increased pCR rates, but worse survival observed in TNBC—termed the triple negative paradox—appears to be driven by higher relapse rates among those patients whose tumors are not eradicated by chemotherapy.2 5 There are very limited and often ineffective treatment options for patients with poor prognosis (chemoresistant and late-stage/metastatic) TNBC.2
Recent large-scale gene expression profiling and immunohistochemistry (IHC) analyses reveal that TNBC may be the most regulated by tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and thus the most responsive to immunotherapies compared with other breast cancer subtypes.6 7 In addition, accumulating data suggest that certain chemotherapeutic drugs such as anthracyclines mediate their anti-cancer activity through direct cytotoxic effects and also through activation of TIL responses.8 The presence of TILs suggests an immune response to tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). Several studies have evaluated TILs in breast cancer specimens and a higher level of TILs has been reported in TNBCs compared with other breast cancer subtypes.9 Furthermore, TNBC is characterized by genomic instability and high rates of genetic mutations, which implicate the production of more neoantigens and increased immunogenicity.10 11 Pivotal gene expression profiling studies carried out by Lehmann et al 12–14 revealed the existence of six subtypes of TNBC, namely basal-like 1, basal-like 2, immunomodulatory, mesenchymal, mesenchymal stem-like and luminal androgen receptor. While these first-generation signatures revealed the transcriptional heterogeneity of TNBC, second-generation prognostic signatures based on immune response–related genes allowed for the stratification of patients with TNBC according to overall and relapse-free survival. Recently, a gene expression analysis of immune activating and suppressive factors in TNBC of the GeparSixto study showed three subgroups of tumors, immune group A, B and C with low, intermediate and high immune gene expression levels, respectively. Importantly, immune group C tumors had a higher extent of TIL infiltrate and better pCR rates compared with tumors from immune groups A and B. Furthermore, the extent of TILs in residual TNBC following NAC has been associated with improved overall and relapse-free survival, highlighting the potential of TIL as a biomarker in the post-adjuvant setting to identify patients at risk of relapse.8 15 16 Taken together, these studies provide strong rationale to therapeutically target poor prognosis TNBC with novel immunotherapies, such as immunogenic tumor cell vaccines.
Infusion of inactivated whole tumor cells, extracted from a patient’s own tumor (autologous), represents a truly personalized treatment option for malignancies with no targeted therapies, such as TNBC. Currently, many immunotherapeutic strategies designed to activate TNBC TILs are being tested in preclinical and clinical studies. Among them are the use of vaccines against cancer testis antigens (MAGE-A, NY-ESO-1) and other TAAs. Recent IHC and gene expression data show more frequent expression of these TAAs in TNBC versus other subtypes.6 16 Given that TNBC is a highly heterogeneous disease, it logically follows that not all patients will benefit from a vaccine strategy targeting a single TAA. On the other hand, treatment with autologous tumor cells will expose a patient with TNBC to their complete and individualized TAA repertoire. Importantly, the multiple personalized epitopes contained within the autologous vaccine can potentiate a polyclonal immune response capable of eliminating a diverse population of heterogeneous TNBC tumors.17 However, whole tumor cell vaccines have demonstrated limited success in clinical trials, mainly due to lack of immunogenicity.17 18 Furthermore, many tumors downregulate their expression of MHC or costimulatory molecules, which are both needed to generate a robust adaptive immune response.
We and others have endeavored to improve on the whole tumor cell vaccination paradigm by infecting harvested tumor cells ex vivo with engineered oncolytic viruses (OVs) followed by direct delivery into the tumor microenvironment.19–22 This approach avoids the major barriers to systemic OV delivery and allows further ex vivo modification of the tumor cells to improve immunogenicity.16 17 Recombinant Vesicular Stomatitis Virus (VSVd51) is a genetically modiﬁed rhabdovirus with a point mutation in the matrix protein, which expands its tropism for diverse cancer types, breast cancer included, and greatly attenuates its replication in healthy tissue when compared with other OVs.23 Specifically, the VSV M protein mutation improves its therapeutic index by preventing viral blockade of host cell transcription and nucleocytoplasmic transport, including interferon (IFN) production.24–26 Following infection with VSVd51, healthy cells with intact IFN signaling pathways are protected, while malignant cells, which have lost the ability to mount an IFN response, remain susceptible.24 27 28 Importantly, the lack of pre-existing neutralizing antibodies in human populations, a major hurdle that impedes the in vivo delivery of many other OVs (herpes, vaccinia, measles), warrants the development of oncolytic rhabdoviruses for clinical applications.29 30 Schirrmacher’s group provided the first proof of concept for an ex vivo infected tumor cell vaccine approach using oncolytic Newcastle Disease Virus to effectively treat colorectal tumors,31 32 while Conrad et al 33 and Lemay et al 22 demonstrated efficacy in L1210 leukemic and B16 melanoma models, respectively.
We recently demonstrated that the intratumoral delivery of autologous colon cancer cells infected with an attenuated rhabdovirus (MG1) provided a significant therapeutic benefit to normally resistant mouse models of established peritoneal disease.19 A whole cell vaccine infected with MG1 was well tolerated by mice while inducing a robust recruitment of cytotoxic natural killer (NK) and T cells to the peritoneal cavity that was associated with robust long-term survival.19 However, in the setting of developing human TNBC that have already escaped the protective immune response, it is unlikely that ICV alone will be effective. A combination of surgery, chemotherapy along with novel small molecule inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies are currently administered to patients with TNBC in clinical trials with the goal of eradicating cancer and eliminating recurrence due to resistant or mutated TNBC cells.2 34 In the phase III Impassion 130 trial, a positive median overall survival (OS) was observed in patients with TNBC receiving anti-PD-L1 atezolizumab with nab-paclitaxel, compared with patients receiving nab-paclitaxel plus placebo.1 35 Given the importance of activating TILs in the immunosuppressive TNBC microenvironment and the high therapeutic potential of immunogenic cancer vaccines, we propose to develop and characterize an oncolytic VSVd51-based cancer vaccine in combination with anti-PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor to treat poor prognosis TNBC in the postoperative setting.
Cell lines and viruses
4T1 and MDA-MB-231 were maintained in DMEM; BT-549 in RPMI, all supplemented with 10% heat inactivated FBS+100 U/mL penicillin and 100 µg/mL streptomycin (P/S). All cell lines were purchased from ATCC in the past year and were verified to be mycoplasma free and show appropriate microscopic morphology at time of use. VSVd51 expressing GFP was propagated on Vero cells and purified using Opti-Prep purification methods. Viral titers were determined by a standard plaque assay as previously published.19 Viral cytotoxicity was assessed on the indicated cell lines, and cell viability was carried out as described previously.19
Female BALB/c mice (6–8 weeks old, 20–25 g) were purchased from Charles Rivers (Quebec). Animals were housed in pathogen-free conditions at the Central Animal Facility of the Université de Sherbrooke with access to food/water ad libitum. Animals were euthanized by cervical dislocation under anesthesia. All studies were conducted in accordance with university guidelines and the Canadian Council on Animal Care.
4T1 syngeneic mouse model with resection and vaccination
We have previously developed and validated a mouse model of spontaneous metastasis and surgical resection of primary TNBC.36 37 At day 0, 1×105 4T1 cells in 100 µL (>98% viability) were injected orthotopically into the fourth mammary fat pad of BALB/c mice. Following tumor implantation, mice were monitored daily by palpation of the injection site, the volume of palpable tumors were measured by a Vernier caliper and the tumor volume was calculated via the equation (width2×length)/2. At days 12–14, a complete resection of the primary tumor was performed (tumor volume=75–80 mm3). During surgery, all mice were kept under anesthesia (3% induction, 1.5% maintenance of isoflurane with 2% O2). For perioperative pain management, all mice were injected with 0.05 mg/kg of buprenorphine 1 hour before and 4 hours following surgery. Mice were randomized into different cohorts for treatment. At 1 day and 3 days following surgery, irradiated 4T1 cells, infected cell vaccine (4T1-ICV), VSVd51 alone or sterile PBS was injected subcutaneously into the cleared mammary fat pad. For the in vivo depletion of immune cell populations, 6 doses of depletion antibodies (1 dose 24 hours before surgery, followed by 5 additional doses 2–3 days apart) were administered by intraperitoneal injection at 20 µg/dose for anti-Asialo (GM1; Life Technologies) and 250 µg/dose for anti-CD8α (53-6.7; BioXCell). For anti-PD-1 treatment, mice were injected intraperitoneally with 1 dose of anti-PD-1 (RMP1-14; BioXCell) at 100 µg/dose, followed by 1 additional dose 3 days later.
TNBC patient tumor dissociation
TNBC tissue from patients were collected after surgery and placed in DMEM supplemented with 10% heat inactivated FBS+P/S. Tumors were dissociated using the human tumor dissociation kit (Miltenyi biotec) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Briefly, tumors were cut into small pieces (<2 mm3), then treated with enzymes and placed into the gentle MACS OctoDissociator (Miltenyi biotec). Macroscopic pieces were removed using 70 µm cell strainers. Tumor cells were washed twice in DMEM. Cells were viably frozen down or freshly used for downstream experiments.
ICV using VSVd51 was prepared as previously published.19 Viable single cell suspensions (5×106) of 4T1 primary tumors were γ-irradiated at 50 Gy. This range of cell number and irradiation has been previously determined to create a non-proliferating but intact whole-cell vaccine.22 VSVd51 was added to the cells at 5×107 plaque-forming units (PFU) and further incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. This preparation was injected subcutaneously in mice at 100 µL, giving each mouse 1:10 γ-irradiated cells to virus per dose (10 multiplicity of infection, MOI).
Antibodies are listed in online supplementary table S1. To analyze mouse spleen and blood lymphocyte populations, an initial incubation was done in ACK lysis buffer for 5 min to lyse red blood cells. A total of 1×106 splenocytes or blood cells were then added to each tube. Fc block was added prior to antibody staining for 20 min at 4°C. Samples were washed twice with flow cytometry buffer (PBS+2% FBS) and acquired on a CytoFLEX 30 (Beckman Coulter). Data were analyzed with CytExpert software. For assessment of NK and T-cell functionality, fresh blood or spleen lymphocytes were cultured with VSVd51-infected 4T1 cell lysates for 4 hours in the presence of brefeldin A (1 µL/mL) at 37°C. After 4 hours, cells were washed twice with PBS, and then stained for NK and T-cell markers (online supplementary table S1). Cells were then fixed and permeabilized using BD Cytofix/Cytoperm kit, according to the manufacturer’s protocol, and intracellular staining for granzyme B and IFNγ was performed. For CD107a, the antibody was added to cells in the beginning for cell-surface staining of CD107a on degranulation, as described previously.
Immunogenic cell death (ICD) assays
Conditioned media (CM) was obtained by seeding 5×105 cells in 24-well plates in their corresponding media for 24 hours followed by infection with VSVd51 at the indicated PFU for the indicated time points. Flow cytometry: infected cells were harvested and processed as described above. Antibodies are listed in online supplementary table S1. Bioimaging was performed using a fluorescence microscope (Leica). Western blot: proteins from CM (HMGB1) or cell lysates (for other proteins) were resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred to Immun-Blot-PVDF membranes (BioRad) for immunoblotting. Protein expression was detected using specific primary antibodies (1:1000) and corresponding HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:10,000). Protein expression was visualized by chemiluminescence detection (ChemiDoc; BioRad). All antibodies are listed in online supplementary table S1. For ATP detection, the relative concentration of ATP in the CM was measured with the ENLITEN-ATP kit (Promega). Briefly, 100 µL of CM was transferred to 96-well opaque plates. Then 100 µL of reconstituted rLuciferase/Luciferin reagent was added to each well followed by measurement of luciferase using a luminescence microplate reader (Fusion V.3.0).
Transmission electron microscopy (EM)
Seventy-two hours following infection with VSVd51, TNBC cells were harvested and provided to the histological platform (Université de Sherbrooke) for processing and imaging. Briefly, cells were fixed in 2.5% cacodylate-buffered glutaraldehyde for a minimum of 2 hours. Cells were then centrifuged and the pellet resuspended in sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2), post-fixed in 2% osmium tetroxide for 2 hours and dehydrated up to absolute ethanol concentrations. A final dehydration in pure acetone was followed by three changes in Spurr’s resin and a final embedding at 65°C. Then 80 nm sections were cut using a Leica Ultracut UCT and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Grids were screened on a Hitachi 7500 Transmission EM and the images were digitally captured.
Quantitative PCR (qPCR)
Total RNA from infected mouse and human TNBC cell lines and single cell suspensions of patient TNBC tissue were extracted using Trizol (Invitrogen) and cDNA was prepared using the QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen) from 1.2 µg of total RNA in the presence of 20 IU of RNAseOUT (Invitrogen). Target transcripts were quantified by qPCR by cDNA amplification with Taq Polymerase (Feldan Bio) and SYBR Green I (Millipore Sigma) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All primers were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies and are listed in online supplementary table S2. Target gene expression was normalized to housekeeping genes 18S ribosomal proteins for human cell lines and tissue samples or to Rplp0 ribosomal protein for mouse cell lines. Transcript levels were calculated using the ΔΔCT (cycle threshold) method and results were displayed as fold change of infected samples relative to uninfected samples. Genes were additionally visualized on 2% agarose gel to confirm their expression if basal levels were not detected.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays
Culture supernatants were diluted fivefold. ELISA kits for detecting mouse CXCL10, CCL5, CCL2 and CCL4 were purchased from Peprotech and performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Human polarization, proliferation and migration assays
Polarization: human monocytes were isolated from peripheral blood (Human CD14+ isolation kit; Stemcell). Then 5×105 monocytes were seeded in 24-well plates in complete RPMI and incubated overnight at 37°C and 5% CO2. Twenty-four hours later, the monocyte media was replaced with the CM of infected human cell lines. For controls, monocytes were co-cultured with recombinant human IL-10, IL-4 and TGFβ (BioBasic) all at a final concentration of 20 ng/mL for differentiation to M2-like macrophages; and with lipopolysaccharides (50 ng/mL) (Millipore Sigma) and recombinant human IFNγ (20 ng/mL) (BioBasic) for M1-like macrophages. Undifferentiated monocytes remained in complete media as M0. Following overnight incubation, cells were harvested and processed for flow cytometry as described above. Antibodies are listed in online supplementary table S1. Proliferation: monocytes from the polarization assay were further incubated with carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE)–labeled (3 µM; BD Horizon) human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) for 5 days in the presence of plate-bound anti-CD3 (OKT3, 5 µg/mL) and anti-CD28 (CD28.2, 2 µg/mL). Cells were harvested and stained with anti-CD3 (HIT3a), anti-CD8 (SK1) for flow cytometric analysis of CFSE dilution. Migration: 200 µL of CM was placed in the lower well of Boyden chambers, separated from the top well by a 5 mm pore polycarbonic membrane (Neuro Probe). Then 6×105 human PBMCs was added to the top chamber, followed by incubation at 37°C, 5% CO2 for 45 min. Next, the media in the top of the chamber was aspirated and the membrane removed with forceps. This was followed by harvesting of media in the bottom chamber and quantification of migrated cells by Trypan Blue exclusion. The cells were stained and acquired by flow cytometry as described above.
Lungs from treated mice were harvested and fixed in 4% formaldehyde for 24 hours and kept in ethanol for analysis. Lungs were then embedded in paraffin and 5 µm sections were used for immunofluorescence staining using CD3, IFNγ and granzyme B. All antibodies are listed in online supplementary table S1. Slides were scanned using a digital slide scanner (Nanozoomer-XR C12000; Hamamatsu) provided by the Histology Platform (Université de Sherbrooke). Percentage staining of marker-positive areas were quantified using ImageJ software (NIH).
All statistical analyses were generated using Prism V.7 (GraphPad). Unpaired two-tailed t-tests were used for comparing uninfected or infected cells or differentially treated mice. Survival differences of tumor-bearing and treated mice were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and analyzed by log-rank testing. P value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Necrotic phenotype accompanies TNBC cell death following infection with VSVd51
We previously demonstrated that an autologous rhabdovirus ICV elicited profound anti-tumor immune responses in B16 melanoma and CT26 peritoneal carcinomatosis preclinical models.19 Given the lack of therapeutic options for poor-prognosis TNBC, we proposed to develop an adjuvant ICV to prevent relapse and reduce metastases in this aggressive disease. We used rhabdoviral VSVd51 expressing enhanced green fluorescence protein (GFP) and first assessed its cytotoxic activity in mouse and human TNBC cells. VSVd51 was able to infect mouse 4T1 and human MDA-MB-231 and BT-549 cells as shown by GFP expression following 72 hours of infection with 10 MOI (figure 1A) and induce cellular cytotoxicity over a range of increasing MOI as measured by a MTT assay (figure 1C). Given the importance of the mode of tumor cell death in initiating anti-tumor immune responses,38 39 we investigated cell death features following infection of TNBC cells with VSVd51. We first examined cellular morphology using transmission EM (figure 1B). Condensed nuclear structures, cytoplasmic vacuoles and ruptured cellular membranes were observed. Next, we detected high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) protein (figure 1D) and ATP (figure 1E) in the supernatant of VSVd51-infected cells at various time points post-infection, suggesting passive release from necrotic cells. Another feature of necrosis is the presence of cell surface externalized calreticulin. Following VSVd51 infection, we observed an increase in the percentage of necrotic (calreticulin+/DAPI+) cells in all tested cell lines at 48 and 72 hours post-infection (figure 1F). Together, the presence of these danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) suggest a necrosis-like phenotype of TNBC cells following VSVd51 infection. Features of classical apoptosis (Annexin V+/DAPI−, Caspase-3 and PARP cleavage) were minimally or not observed (online supplementary figure 1A,B). In addition, the autophagic flux was blocked by bafilomycin treatment and no differences in the conversion of LC3-I to LC3-II was observed following VSVd51 infection in all cell lines tested. This suggests that VSVd51 infection of TNBC cells does not lead to autophagic cell death (online supplementary figure 1C). By comparison, treatment of TNBC cells with doxorubicin, a clinically relevant neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic for TNBC, revealed that VSVd51 induced greater release of HMGB1 and calreticulin exposure (online supplementary figure 1D,E).
Immunogenic gene signature is detected on TNBC cells after infection with VSVd51
Next, we sought to determine if VSVd51-induced necrosis is immunogenic in nature. To accomplish this, we examined a panel of genes related to pro-inflammatory, anti-inflammatory, antigen presentation and immune differentiation markers by qPCR. Following overnight infection with VSVd51, we detected a general upregulation of genes related to immune cell recruitment and activation in mouse and human TNBC cell lines tested. Notably, mouse CCL2, CCL4, CCL5, CXCL10, IL-6 and MHC-I related genes showed an increase in expression in 4T1 cells following infection compared with non-infected controls (figure 2A). The expression of several top immunogenic genes (CCL2, CCL4, CCL5 and CXCL10) at the protein level were measured by ELISA in 4T1 cells following infection to support the gene expression data (online supplementary figure 2A). In human MDA-MB-231 and BT-549 cell lines, CCL5, CXCL2, IRF-1 and MHC-I genes were upregulated (figure 2B,C). Genes were additionally visualized on 2% agarose gel to confirm their expression if basal levels were not detected. Notably, IFNγ, IL-2 and PD1 genes were induced following infection in 4T1 cells (online supplementary figure 2B), while CSF-1, CCL4 and CXCL10 were induced in BT-549 and MDA-MB-231 infected cells (online supplementary figure 2C,D). These data suggest that an immunogenic gene signature is present in TNBC cells following VSVd51-induced necrotic cell death.
Enhanced innate and adaptive immune cell activation by ICV
To determine if the observed in vitro ICD features (figure 1) and gene signatures (figure 2) translate to enhanced immune function in vivo, we tested the ICV in the adjuvant setting in BALB/c mice bearing orthotopic 4T1 tumors following primary tumor resection (figure 3A, timeline). This model makes use of an aggressive mouse stage IV TNBC from the BALB/c strain that spontaneously metastasizes from the mammary glands to multiple distant sites, in particular the lungs. We included the following treatment cohorts (PBS, irradiated 4T1 cells, VSVd51 alone and ICV) to delineate the role of the vaccine’s constituent parts. At early and late time points following vaccination, we observed that postoperative vaccination of mice with 2 doses of ICV significantly enhanced the proportion of blood IFNγ+, granzyme B+ (cytotoxicity) and CD107a+ (degranulation) NK cells compared with administration of virus alone, non-infected cells or PBS (figure 3B). Similar results were observed in CD11c+ conventional dendritic cells (DCs) in terms of their overall proportion and activation status (CD86+) (figure 3C). Analysis of both blood and lung CD3+/CD8+ T cells showed enhanced IFNγ, granzyme B and CD107a degranulation in ICV-treated mice over controls (figure 3D,E). Immunofluorescence staining of mice lungs bearing metastatic 4T1 tumors treated with ICV showed increased presence of CD3+ T cells, granzyme B and IFNγ expression compared with lungs from mice treated with irradiated 4T1 cells (figure 3F,G). By comparison with ICV, the addition of a treatment cohort receiving systemic doxorubicin injection, a known ICD inducer, resulted in decreased CD8+ T-cell CD107a degranulation and IFNγ production compared with ICV treatment. Importantly, survival of ICV-treated mice significantly surpassed those cohorts treated with irradiated 4T1 cells or doxorubicin (online supplementary figure 3A–C). Taken together, these in vivo data demonstrate the innate and adaptive immune activating capacity of the ICV approach.
CD8+ cytotoxic T cells are critical for ICV efficacy and combination treatment with anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor improves survival in the BALB/c-4T1 model
To further investigate the critical role of NK and CD8+ T cells after ICV administration, we monitored for survival in ICV-treated mice that were pharmacologically depleted singly or of both immune cell populations (figure 4A,B). In support of the in vivo data showing enhanced NK and CD8+ T-cell function (figure 3), the protective effect of vaccinated mice with ICV was partially abrogated on depletion of NK cells, but completely abrogated on depletion of CD8+ T cells or combination of NK and CD8+ T cells (figure 4B). These results suggest that the therapeutic benefit of this treatment strategy is dependent on both NK and CD8+ T-cell recruitment, but likely more dependent on CD8+ T cells. Given the importance of CD8+ T cells and their role in mediating the response to ICV treatment, we examined cell surface expression of exhaustion markers on CD8+ T cells at day 9 following ICV treatment and observed augmented levels of PD-1, but not TIM-3 or LAG-3 (figure 4C). In addition, we observed upregulation of PD-L1 expression levels on 4T1 cells following infection with VSVd51 in vitro (figure 4D). These data suggest that the adaptive T-cell response could be modulated to override exhaustion. Therefore, to improve the immune response and survival of vaccinated mice, we combined ICV with anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor treatment (figure 4E,F). We observed that combination therapy prolonged survival compared with either monotherapy ICV or anti-PD-1 alone. These preclinical results demonstrate the therapeutic potential of ICV in combination with checkpoint inhibitors to treat TNBC.
Polarization of human monocytes to M1 phenotype and enhanced migration and proliferation of human CD8+ T cells following exposure to ICV
To improve the translational potential of our work, we examined the effect of ICV on human primary antigen-presenting cells. In ex vivo co-culture experiments with CD14+ human monocytes incubated with cell-free lysates derived from infected human TNBC cells, we observed polarization of monocytes toward an M1-like phenotype that have been previously suggested40 41 to promote anti-tumor immune responses (figure 5A). We additionally examined the activation status of human DC treated ex vivo with the same cell-free lysates (online supplementary figure 4A). ICV-lysate treated DC displayed a more mature phenotype compared with controls. To examine the consequences of ICV-induced M1-like monocytes on effector immune cells, we measured human NK and CD8+ T-cell migration and CD8+ T-cell proliferation in the ex vivo setting. We observed increased migration of NK cells and increased migration and proliferation (CFSE dilution) of CD3+/CD8+ T cells in co-cultures with ICV-lysate treated M1 monocytes (figure 5B,C). Taken together, these data using human primary immune cells and human TNBC cell lines demonstrate the immune activating potential of ICV.
ICV enhances immune signature and biomarkers of ICD in human TNBC patient tissue
To investigate whether the ICV could elicit an immunogenic signature in human TNBC patient tissue, patients with TNBC were enrolled in the VACS study as part of the Sherbrooke Gynecologic Biobank (Ethics no. 2018-2414). Dissociated breast tumor tissue was obtained from two patients with TNBC (BRC1762, BRC1756). The cells were infected with VSVd51 overnight and qPCR for gene expression analysis and assays to measure biomarkers of ICD were conducted. Patient BRC1762 displayed an immunogenic gene expression pattern with enhanced expression of multiple immune genes, notably CCL5, CCL2, CXCL9, CXCL11, CCL3,TGFb, CSF-2, TAP1 and TAP2 (figure 6A). In addition, the genes CCL20, IFNα, IFNβ and GRA that were not basally expressed in uninfected samples showed induced expression following infection with VSVd51. In patient BRC1756, CCL2, CCL5, CXCL2, CCL20, IRF1, TAP1 and TAP2 gene expression were also increased (figure 6B) and the genes CCL20, CTLA-4, CCL3 and CCL4 were induced following infection (online supplementary figure 4B). Biomarkers of ICD including calreticulin cell surface expression (for patient BRC1762) (figure 6C), ATP (figure 6D) and HMGB1 (figure 6E) release for both patients were detected at higher levels in VSVd51-infected cells compared with uninfected controls. These human data demonstrate that an ICD gene signature is present in patient TNBC cells following VSVd51 infection, and this phenotype has the potential of recruiting and activating important immune cells in vivo. Taken together, our translational data highlight the clinical potential of using ICV as adjuvant vaccine to treat patients with TNBC.
Given the lack of effective treatments in TNBC, several efforts over the last few years have been made to improve therapeutic opportunities for patients with TNBC, especially for those patients who do not achieve pCR after NAC. In the phase III Impassion 130 trial, a significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and a positive median OS was observed in patients with TNBC receiving anti-PD-L1 atezolizumab with nab-paclitaxel, compared with patients receiving nab-paclitaxel plus placebo.1 35 Preliminary data from the phase Ib/II KEYNOTE-150 trial investigating the combination of anti-PD-1 pembrolizumab with eribulin (microtubule inhibitor) demonstrated substantial benefits in both PFS and OS in the combination treatment arm.1 42 In addition to combination immune checkpoint and chemotherapy trials, PARP inhibitors are also undergoing early phase trials for the treatment of TNBC, especially when associated with homologous recombination deficiency.43 Despite these new treatments, early data show modest improvements in survival, underscoring the need to improve therapeutic outcome for patients with TNBC.
Autologous tumor cell vaccines are an antigen agnostic form of personalized immunotherapy. Unlike single tumor antigen-targeted vaccines (pre-defined antigens), treatment with autologous tumor cell vaccines exposes a patient with cancer to their complete and individualized TAA repertoire, therefore reducing the likelihood of tumor escape due to tumor heterogeneity and eliminating the need to sequence the tumor a priori, saving both time and money.18–20 The combination of cytokine delivery with whole tumor cells is capable of signiﬁcantly delaying tumor growth through the creation of a pro-inflammatory environment to enhance immune system activation against TAAs.44 Existing data suggest that disease recurrence is signiﬁcantly delayed when patients successfully mount an immune response against the tumor, as evidenced by a delayed-type hypersensitivity response.45 Clinical studies have consistently shown that survival is significantly better in patients who mount an immune response against their tumor cells.21 22 The strong immunological rationale for cytokine-based whole cell vaccines continues to drive the clinical development of this novel approach.23–26 Unfortunately, the majority of patients do not mount such a response, either because the tumor cell vaccine and cytokine combination are not immunogenic enough or because the host immune system is suppressed in response to the cancer. The FANG vaccine, which is composed of granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor/shRNAi furin vector-transfected autologous tumor cells, was designed to improve immunogenicity and dampen immune suppression.46 Treatment with this vaccine was associated with a high rate of T-cell activation and prolonged recurrence-free survival in patients with stage III/IV ovarian cancer,47 demonstrating the clinical potential of immunogenic autologous tumor vaccines.
Our laboratory and others have endeavored to improve on the whole cell vaccination paradigm by infecting tumor cells ex vivo with OV.19–22 As proof of concept for solid tumors, we recently demonstrated that the intratumoral delivery of autologous colon cancer cells infected with rhabodoviral MG1 provided a significant therapeutic benefit to normally resistant mouse models of established peritoneal disease.19 Both NK and T cells demonstrated enhanced recruitment to the peritoneal cavity following MG1-ICV administration.19 From in vitro experiments in this study, we determined that infection of mouse and human TNBC cells with rhabdoviral VSVd51 results in higher necrotic cell death than in non-infected cells. We observed morphological features of necrosis by transmission EM, enhanced release of intracellular HMGB1 and ATP and increased calreticulin+/DAPI+ populations (figure 1). Further, an immunogenic gene signature was detected in infected TNBC cell lines. From in vivo experiments, we observed that postoperative vaccination of mice with 2 doses of ICV significantly augmented both innate and adaptive immune cell functionality. Both NK and CD8+ T cells were important in contributing toward vaccine efficacy. However, CD8+ T cells appear to play a more important role in mediating therapeutic efficacy as evidenced by shortened survival in CD8+ T-cell-depleted mice, singly or in combination with NK cells.
In many cancer types, checkpoint blockade immunotherapy has been shown to provide long-lasting survival benefit by re-invigorating immune cells within the tumor; however, this occurs in only a small percentage of responding patients.48–50 Resistance to checkpoint blockade therapy due to tumors evolving to escape immune attack further detracts from the clinical utility of this ground-breaking immunotherapy. As immunotherapy continues to reinforce itself at the forefront of oncology treatment, we strive to take advantage of these promising therapies by extending their clinical utility to immunogenically cold tumors such as TNBC. We propose to increase the recruitment of TILs into the TNBC tumor microenvironment through the use of immune-stimulatory combination immunotherapies. This could potentially be achieved through ICD-inducing chemotherapies such as doxorubicin or anthracyclines. Our in vitro and in vivo data showed that ICV is superior to drug treatment for enhancing ICD, immune recruitment and survival. However, this does not preclude the possibility of drug treatment with ICV prior to checkpoint blockade. Using ICD-inducing drug plus VSVd51-based ICV to initiate an anti-tumorigenic inflammatory response in TNBC tumors prior to treatment with checkpoint blockade has the potential to significantly improve patient prognosis by optimizing the power of complementary immunotherapy strategies. We envisage a future clinical trial to consist of an optimized adjuvant ICV-based strategy to initiate ICD and TAA release to promote an anti-tumor immune response. This will be followed by checkpoint inhibitor administration to further potentiate the anti-tumor activity of T cells at the tumor site. Our in vivo studies in BALB/c-4T1 mice showed improved and prolonged overall survival compared with monotherapy ICV or anti-PD1 alone. Immune profiling of other exhaustion markers on both NK and CD8+ T cells following ICV treatment indicates that other checkpoint blockades including LAG3 on NK cells (data not shown) could be added to further improve the efficacy of this dual therapy. In a recent preclinical study to mimic the treatment course for patients with newly diagnosed TNBC, neoadjuvant OV was used to sensitize the tumor to checkpoint blockade therapy.51 A neoadjuvant priming OV could potentially be administered prior to adjvuant ICV in a heterologous prime-boost strategy to achieve synergistic long-term anti-tumor benefits.
In human studies, we demonstrated that an analogous mechanism of ICV-induced immune activation is occurring in human TNBC cell lines and in human TNBC patient tumor samples. Our human TNBC cell line data demonstrate that ICV lysate can polarize monocytes toward an M1-like phenotype, induce maturation of DC (online supplementary figure 3A) and lead to greater NK and T-cell migration and T-cell proliferation (figure 5). In addition, qPCR data demonstrated upregulation of many genes that are involved in the immune process and the release of immunogenic DAMPs following infection of TNBC cell lines with VSVd51 (figure 2). In two TNBC patient samples, gene expression data revealed an immunogenic gene signature, while evaluation of ICD biomarkers showed augmented release of DAMPs following infection of patient tissue with VSVd51. Taken together, these human results demonstrate the feasibility of developing a VSVd51-based immunogenic vaccine to treat TNBC.
In summary, we characterized the mechanism and clinical potential of a VSVd51-based cancer vaccine for treating TNBC. We demonstrated that both innate and adaptive immune cells play mediating roles in the in vivo efficacy of ICV (figure 7). Further translational testing in our laboratory will include identifying ICD pathways intrinsic to individual TNBC patient tissue and their response to VSVd51 infection. This will allow us to engineer precision ICV to ensure that ICD is present, regardless of tumor heterogeneity, which is especially prevalent in the TNBC population. In addition, we aim to further understand the molecular events unleashed by ICV in our validated mice models and in patient samples that dictate immunogenicity and subsequent development of anti-tumor immunity. These translational studies could lead to future clinical trials of ICV monotherapy in TNBC or as potent anti-tumor immune response drivers in combination with immune checkpoint blockade. Although these studies are being conducted in TNBC, they have potential widespread implications across various solid tumor types.
The authors would like to thank Francis Bernier-Godon, Isabelle Matte and Sylvie Turcotte for their assistance in processing blood and tumor tissue; Dr Denis Gris for immunofluorescence reagents; and Dr Leonid Volkov for their flow cytometry expertise.
Contributors S-RN, CL, MB, CS and L-HT executed experiments, read and approved the manuscript; S-RN and CL contributed in writing and critically revised the manuscript; L-HT conceived, designed and executed experiments, was a major contributor in writing the manuscript, and supervised the study. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.
Funding CIHR New Investigator Award and FRQS Jr 1 Salary Awards (L-HT)—provided salary for the principal investigator; CIHR Project Scheme Grant (L-HT)—provided operating funds for this study; Universite de Sherbrooke, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Graduate Scholarship (S-RN)—provided the student scholarship for the first author.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Ethics approval Mice were housed in pathogen-free conditions at the Central Animal Care Facility of the Université de Sherbrooke (Quebec). All studies and manipulations performed on animals were conducted in accordance with university guidelines and approved by the Faculty of Medicine Animal Care Committee at the university. Human tumor tissue was collected through the Sherbrooke Gynecological Biobank (VACS study, no. 2018-2414) and approved by the ethics board of CIUSSS de l’Estrie CHUS.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data availability statement The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.