Article Text
PDF
Abstract
Background Relapsed/refractory B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) remains a major therapeutic challenge in pediatric hematology. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeting CD19 have shown remarkable initial response rates in BCP-ALL patients, while long-term leukemia control rate is only about 50%. So far, main mechanisms of BCP-ALL relapse after CD19-CAR T-cell therapy have been either insufficient CAR T-cell persistence in vivo or loss of surface CD19.
Case Report Here, we report an exceptional presentation of BCP-ALL relapse in the eye during the systemic control through CAR T-cell therapy. We report a case of fatal intraocular relapse in a pediatric patient with pro-B-ALL after initial response to CD19-CAR T-cell therapy. One month after CD19-CAR T-cell therapy, remission was documented by bone marrow aspirate analysis with absence of CD19+ cells and CD19-CAR T cells could be detected in both peripheral blood and bone marrow. At the same time, however, the patient presented with progressive visual disturbance and CD19+ cells were found within the anterior chamber of the eye. Despite local and systemic therapy, ocular relapse led to BCP-ALL dissemination and systemic relapse within weeks. The eye represents a rare site for local manifestation of BCP-ALL, but isolated intraocular relapse is a clinically unreckoned presentation of BCP-ALL in the era of CD19-CAR T cells.
Conclusion During systemic control of BCP-ALL through CD19-CAR T cells, relapse can emerge in the eye as an immune-privileged organ. Ocular symptoms after CD19-CAR T-cell therapy should guide the clinician to elucidate the etiology in a timely fashion in order to adjust leukemia treatment strategy. Both, local immune escape as well as insufficient CAR T-cell persistence may have contributed to relapse in the reported patient. Mechanisms of relapse in an immune desert under CAR T-cell therapy require future clinical and experimental attention. In particular, ocular symptoms after CAR T-cell therapy should be considered a potentially early sign of leukemia relapse.
- receptors
- chimeric antigen
- immunotherapy
- adoptive
- pediatrics
- tumor escape
- T-Lymphocytes
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Background
Relapsed/refractory B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) remains a major therapeutic challenge. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeting CD19 have shown remarkable initial response rates but relevant relapse rates later on.1 2 Mechanisms of immune escape have been either loss of target structure or insufficient CAR T-cell persistence in vivo.3 4 Here, we report a novel clinical presentation of BCP-ALL relapse under CAR T-cell therapy, relapse within the eye as an immunologically privileged organ. CD19-CAR T cells are currently evaluated in numerous clinical trials5 and especially pediatric BCP-ALL shows initial response rates to CD19-CAR T cells of more than 80% in refractory or relapsed, heavily pretreated patients.1 Despite these promising response rates, about half of pediatric patients and the vast majority of adult patients experience relapse within 2 years after CD19-CAR T-cell therapy. CD19 antigen loss under selective pressure is mediated through downregulation of CD19, splice variants/mutations of CD19 or myeloid differentiation of leukemic blasts. To our knowledge, an intraocular relapse has not been reported. The eye represents a sequestered compartment within the body that enjoys immune privilege through various immunomodulatory mechanisms such as immunosuppressant chemokine and ocular FasL expression.6 Extramedullary manifestations of pediatric ALL have been described in cerebrospinal fluid, testis and the eye and those manifestations are characterized as immune privileged sites.7 Here, we report the case of a 3-year-old boy with relapsed pro-B ALL and previous extensive extramedullary disease after two allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (HSCT) and previous CD19-CAR T-cell therapy, who presented with an intraocular relapse after second CD19-CAR T-cell therapy, progressing to fatal systemic relapse.
Case presentation
The boy was diagnosed with pro-B ALL, t(9;11) MLL-rearrangement, central nervous system (CNS) involvement and initial white cell count of 30x10ˆ9/L at 5 months of age. Minimal residual disease (MRD) markers persisted after initial treatment according to the Interfant-06 protocol8 and a first HSCT from a HLA-compatible (10/10) matched unrelated donor (conditioning with fludarabine, treosulfan, ATG-Grafalon) was performed at 12 months of age (figure 1A). Despite complete donor chimerism on day +55, combined bone marrow (BM) and CNS relapse occurred at week 12. Remission was achieved with blinatumomab in combination with pembrolizumab and the patient subsequently received a second HSCT with peripheral blood stem cells from his HLA-haploidentical mother at 16 months of age (conditioning with clofarabine, thiotepa, melphalan, ATG-Grafalon). A second combined relapse in BM and CNS 5 months after second HSCT proved refractory to blinatumomab and inotuzumab ozogamicin. At 27 months of age the patient received a first CD19-CAR T-cell therapy (4-1BB second generation CD19-CAR). BM analysis showed complete remission after 1 month. A CD34+ stem cell boost was performed for prolonged BM insufficiency.
Clinical course. (A) LDH (lactate dehydrogenase) and MRD (genetic minimal residual disease) are displayed as leukemic markers. Red boxes indicate major events in the patient’s history. (B) CD19 expression as measured by flow cytometry (clone SJ25C1, BD) was seen on bone marrow aspirates at initial diagnosis, third relapse and peripheral blood on day +65 after second CD19-CAR T-cell therapy. At the time of invasive ocular diagnostics, 12 days after ocular symptom onset on day +28 after second CD19-CAR T-cell therapy, no CD19 expression was detected within the bone marrow. (C) Flow cytometry analysis of second CD19-CAR product demonstrating a CD4:CD8 ratio of 7.6:1. (D) flow cytometry analysis of CD19-CAR transduction of second CD19-CAR product. FITC-labeled recombinant CD19 protein was used to detect CD19-CAR transduced CD3+ cells within the CAR product. A negative control using non-transduced T-cells is displayed as reference. (E) CD95 expression on CD3+ T cells in the second CD19-CAR product was measured by flow cytometry (red histogram, “second CAR T-cell product”). as reference, non-transduced T-cells were included in the histogram (orange histogram ‘control T cells’). B, blinatumomab cycle; BM, bone marrow; CAR, chimeric antigen receptor; CNS, central nervous system; CTx, chemotherapy; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; I, inotuzumab ozogamicin cycle; P, pembrolizumab cycle; RT, radiotherapy; SSC-A: side scatter area; FITC: Fluorescein isothiocyanate.
Four months after CD19-CAR T-cell therapy, the patient suffered from a third combined BM and extramedullary relapse with a solitary skin lesion (immunohistochemistry CD19+). A local irradiation with 3D-plan, 6MeV photons, to a total dose of 18 Gy (4×4.5 Gy) was carried out with good clinical response. Despite blinatumomab therapy, extramedullary leukemic progression occurred in testes and multiple subcutaneous chloromas. With CD19 still being expressed on leukemic cells of the patient after two lines of anti-CD19 therapy (blinatumomab and first CD19-CAR T-cell therapy), we expected the patient to benefit from a second CD19-CAR T-cell therapy. Consequently, treatment with tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah) was initiated at our institution with confirmed persistent CD19+ disease in the BM (figure 1B). After confirmation of complete donor chimerism in peripheral blood, lymphocyte apheresis of the patient was performed. No clinical symptoms of ocular pathology were present at that time point and cranial MRI with contrast medium did not show any ocular pathology, either. Second CD19-CAR T-cell treatment was performed after lymphocyte depletion with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide at 39 months of age. The patient received 8.7×106 cells per kg body weight, the CD4:CD8 ratio was 7.6:1 and the CD19-CAR transduction rate was 21% (figure 1C,D). The patient experienced cytokine release syndrome grade 1 on day +11 which was treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. CD34+ stem cell boost from the second HSCT donor was given for prolonged cellular aplasia complicated by bacterial sepsis. BM and CNS analysis on day +28 documented remission by microscopy, flow cytometry and genetic MRD testing (figure 1A,B). Moreover, CD19-CAR T cells could be detected in both peripheral blood and bone marrow by flow cytometry using FITC-labeled recombinant CD19 protein and by real-time PCR, although in low frequency (∼1% of viable T cells).
On day +16 the patient displayed erythema of the left eye and was initially diagnosed with conjunctivitis. However, symptoms progressed with pain, hyposphagma, vision impairment, mild proptosis and ptosis within 1 week. Swab testing was negative for viral infection (adenovirus, cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus) and local antibiotic therapy did not improve symptoms. On ophthalmological assessment on day +28, the eye showed progressive conjunctival chemosis and anterior chamber cellular infiltration along with increased intraocular pressure (IOP). Intraocular bleeding was suspected due to thrombocytopenia. The patient was treated with platelet transfusion, systemic acetazolamide to reduce the IOP and local immunosuppressant dexamethasone. After progressive findings with hypopyon and worsening of the fundus reflex (figure 2A,B), biopsy of episclera and conjunctiva and an anterior chamber fluid tap with a single port vitrectomy for vitreous tap were performed.
Clinical manifestation of binocular relapse of pro-B ALL after second CD19-CAR T-cell therapy. (A) Left eye before surgery. No intraocular structures are identifiable, the cornea appears clear but the anterior chamber is filled with a pus-like yellowish fluid, which resembles hypopyon in endophthalmitis. Note the hemorrhagic (reddish) appearance of the fluid which is not typically seen in infectious hypopyon. Additionally, the conjunctiva/sclera show a salmon-pink, ‘fleshy’ appearance, typically seen in conjunctival lymphoma. (B) Left eye after rinsing of the anterior chamber with extraction of the anterior chamber material. Now large dilated vessels on the surface of the iris can be identified at the periphery of the iris. The lens demonstrated a clear appearance. (C) CD3 and CD19 immunohistochemistry (IHC) of conjunctiva biopsy of the left eye. CD3+ T cells are concentrated at the surface of the conjunctiva. CD19+ cells show subepithelial localization and are widely observed within the connective tissue with additional perivascular accumulation. (D) CD3 and CD19 IHC from anterior ocular chamber lavage of the left eye. Most importantly, within anterior chamber lavage only CD19+ cells are present while in the CD3 IHC nucleated cells are CD3 negative. Black rectangles in left panel graphs illustrate the regions which are displayed in right panel graphs. for IHC, 4 µm sections of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were cut and antigen retrieval was carried out with microwave treatment and antigen target retrieval solution (Agilent technologies) for 64 min (pH 8.4). incubation for 28 min with either monoclonal rabbit anti-CD3 (1:150 dilution, clone Sp7, Zytomed) or monoclonal mouse anti-CD19 (1:20 dilution, clone EP169, Cellmarque) followed. Then, slides were incubated with a secondary anti-rabbit IgG antibody (MP-7401, ImmPress reagent kit, peroxidase-conjugated) followed by target detection using ultraView universal DAB detection kit (Ventana). BM, bone marrow; CAR, chimeric antigen receptor.
Unfortunately, intraoperative findings and histology demonstrated episcleral and intraocular infiltration by atypical CD19+ lymphoid cells, confirming intraocular ALL relapse after second CD19-CAR T-cell therapy (figure 3). CD19+ cells were found inside the lamina propria of the conjunctiva with a perivascular accumulation, whereas CD3+ cells were found preferentially within the epithelium of the conjunctiva (figure 2C). Immunohistochemistry of nucleated cells in the lavage material of the anterior chamber confirmed presence of CD19+ cells and complete absence of CD3+ cells inside the eye (figure 2D). The patient showed no signs of systemic or CNS relapse with absence of CD19+ cells in BM (figure 1B), peripheral blood or cerebral spinal fluid. Prophylactic intrathecal chemotherapy was administered on day +37 (methotrexate, cytarabine, prednisolone) to prevent per continuitatem invasion of the CNS. Despite missing histological material from the right eye, clinical involvement with hyperemia led to the conclusion of a binocular disease. Subsequently, a bilateral orbital radiotherapy to a total dose of 20 Gy in ten fractions with 6 MeV photon beam was initiated on day +40 as a palliative measure. Intraocular administration of chemotherapy was not performed. Radiotherapy was well tolerated with only minor local erythema and the patient showed temporary symptom relief. Unfortunately, the patient’s condition deteriorated rapidly and peripheral blood testing confirmed systemic progression with leukocytosis (34.5x10ˆ9/L) and 51% CD19+ peripheral blasts. Palliative chemotherapy with cytarabine was performed but the patient deceased 6 weeks after intraocular relapse on day +75 after second CD19-CAR T-cell therapy.
Donor chimerism at time of lymphocyte apheresis and detection of CD19 targeted CAR T cells at time of ocular relapse. (A) Donor chimerism in peripheral blood as determined by Fluorescence in situ analysis analysis based on X/Y chromosome analysis with a female donor for a male patient. Shortly before lymphocyte apheresis from the patient (blue dotted line), 100% donor chimerism was documented. (B) Real-time PCR (RT-PCR) analysis of peripheral blood prior to second CAR T-cell therapy (PB d-29), peripheral blood (PB d+28) and bone marrow (BM d+28) 1 month after second CAR T-cell therapy and a positive control (in vitro generated CD19 CAR T-cells from our lab) using primers specific for the CAR molecule. A weak signal can be seen in both samples after second CAR T-cell therapy both in peripheral blood (4.6x negative control) and BM (21.5x negative control). (C) Flow cytometry analysis of the same two biosamples used for RT-PCR, taken at d +28 after second CAR T-cell therapy. after gating on lymphocytes (SSC-A vs FSC-A), single cells (FSC-H vs FSC-A), CD45hi, CD3+ and TCRalpha/beta+ we measured expression of CD19 CAR with recombinant, FITC-labeled CD19 molecule (Stained) and used recombinant, FITC-labeled CD22 molecule as negative control (Control). within BM, 1.4% of CAR T cells can be detected and 0.7% CAR T cells are detected within peripheral blood. CAR, chimeric antigen receptor, FSC-A, forward scatter area, FSC, forward scatter height.
Discussion and conclusions
In recent literature, CD19-CAR T cells have been shown to clear CNS disease after intravenous administration9 and a trial with 86 patients documented no effect of extramedullary disease prior to CD19-CAR T-cell therapy on prognosis.10 Ocular involvement of BCP-ALL at time of diagnosis is associated with CNS or BM relapse and a decrease in overall survival greater than 50%.11 Glaucoma has been mentioned as possible symptom of ocular involvement.12 However, to our knowledge, there are no available data on frequency of extramedullary disease or ocular relapse after CD19-CAR T-cell therapy.
The concept of immune privilege is an evolutionary adaptation to protect indispensable tissues and was first described in testes and eyes13–15 and more recently in other organs such as the CNS16 and is mediated by expression of immunosuppressant chemokines, FasL expression and absence of MHC-1 on ocular tissues.17 Moreover, it has been shown that CAR T cells are susceptible to FasL-induced cell death due to Fas (CD95) expression on CAR T cells.18 Indeed, CAR T cells administered prior to intraocular relapse showed high CD95 expression by flow cytometry (figure 1E). We hypothesize that extramedullary-prone blasts and the immune privileged milieu within the eye may have led to immune evasion from CD19-CAR T-cell attack. This concept is supported by the simultaneous presence of CD19+ blasts within the anterior chamber of the left eye in complete absence of T cells while no CD19+ events could be detected within the BM or peripheral blood (figure 1, figure 2C,D). CD19-CAR T cells have been previously described to infiltrate immune privileged sites beyond the CNS, documented by, for example, a recent case report on bilateral retinal detachment after CD19-CAR T-cell therapy in a patient with retinal infiltration19 and by the efficacy of CD19-CAR T cells in testicular CD19+ leukemia.20–22 In addition to local immune escape, mechanisms of insufficient CAR T-cell persistence may have led to relapse in our patient. The possible overlap and rapid evolvement of systemic leukemia after local relapse limit definitive mechanistic conclusions in our case. Future clinical and experimental studies will be required to clarify the mechanistic role of immune desert for relapse under selective pressure of CD19-CAR T cells.
Finally, we want to raise awareness for leukemia relapse after CD19-CAR T-cell therapy presenting with ocular symptoms resembling intraocular infection or thrombocytopenic hemorrhage. As most relevant differential diagnosis, intraocular infection may occur in immune-compromised patients, typically as CMV retinitis, or as bacterial or fungal infection. Intraocular relapse must be considered in patients presenting with ocular symptoms after CD19-CAR T-cell therapy, especially in patients with rapid symptom progression and elevated IOP. Accordingly, we suggest to initiate appropriate invasive diagnostic procedures in those patients, to clearly differentiate between leukemia-related and non-leukemia-related etiology of ocular symptoms. Early detection and local treatment intervention might prevent fatal relapse progression.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the team at the von Hauner University Children’s Hospital for the care of the patient, Gertrud und Hugo Adler Stiftung for support and Alexandra Skorupa (Novartis) for advice. SW was supported by the Else-Kröner-Fresenius Stiftung and DS by the German Cancer Consortium (DKTK).
References
Footnotes
SW and JR contributed equally.
Contributors The concept was set up by TF. The patient was treated by VB, MHA, IS, JR, SW, FB, AW, MPE and TF. TGPG performed immunohistochemistry and DS, FJ and SW performed flow cytometry. SW, JR and TF wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Ethics approval This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and authorized by the local ethics committee (Ethikkommission der LMU München, project 17-163).
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.