Background Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) are associated with favorable survival and play a critical role in most solid tumors. However, investigations of TLS are lacking in patients with grade 1 or grade 2 (G1/G2) non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PanNETs). This study aimed to investigate the presence, cellular composition, association with tumor-infiltrating immune cells, and prognostic value of TLS in G1/G2 NF-PanNETs.
Methods Tumor tissues from a 182-patient Fudan cohort and a 125-patient external validation set were assessed by H&E staining, immunohistochemistry, and/or multispectral fluorescent immunohistochemistry.
Results TLS were identified in more than one-third of patients with G1/G2 NF-PanNETs and were located peritumorally, either just outside the tumor tissue or in the stromal area. TLS were mainly composed of B-cell follicles with germinal centers and T-cell zones with dendritic cells. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed that the presence of TLS correlated with both longer recurrence-free survival (RFS, p<0.001) and overall survival (OS, p=0.001), but the number of TLS had no prognostic significance. Multivariate Cox-regression analyses demonstrated that the presence of TLS, WHO classification, and 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC8th) tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage were independent prognostic factors for RFS (p=0.004, p=0.001, and p<0.001, respectively) and OS (p=0.009, p=0.008, and p=0.019, respectively). These results were confirmed using an external validation set. Finally, a nomogram incorporating the presence of TLS was constructed to predict the probability of 5-year RFS of resected G1/G2 NF-PanNETs, which improved on the current WHO classification and AJCC8th TNM stage.
Conclusions The presence of TLS is an independent and favorable predictor of resected G1/G2 NF-PanNETs, which may play a role in cancer immunobiology.
- gastrointestinal neoplasms
- tumor biomarkers
- tumor microenvironment
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) are a rare, heterogeneous group of tumors arising from the neuroendocrine system and are classified as functional or non-functional (NF-PanNETs).1 NF-PanNETs account for 60%–90% of PanNETs, tend not to secrete biologically active hormones or neuropeptides and have no characteristic symptoms.2–4 More than 90% of resected PanNETs are grade 1 or grade 2 (G1/G2) tumors,5 with a Ki67 index <20%.6 However, as heterogeneous tumors, variable genetic components and clinical behaviors of G1/G2 NF-PanNETs shape tumor fate. It has been difficult to predict recurrence or overall survival (OS) and thus, a better understanding of G1/G2 NF-PanNETs will inform clinical decisions.7
The tumor-immune microenvironment provides a functional context affecting tumor growth and progression. Recent reviews have described the tumor-immune microenvironment and delineated the immune components in gastroenteropancreatic NETs.8–12 Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) are an important element of the tumor-immune microenvironment. These structures are ectopic lymphoid aggregates detected as intratumoral and peritumoral immune cell clusters and represent sites of lymphoid neogenesis in most solid tumors.13 14 Similar to secondary lymphoid organs (SLO), particularly in morphology and cellular composition,15 16 TLS may play an important role in recruiting lymphocytes and promoting an efficacious immune microenvironment.17 High densities of TLS are associated with good clinical outcomes in pancreatic,18 colorectal, gastric,19 lung,20 and breast cancer,21 22 and oral squamous cell carcinoma, indicating TLS might be a predictive and prognostic factor. Further, TLS might form a compartment that generates memory T cells and B cells, thus aiding immune responses against tumors.14 However, TLS have also been suggested to act as microniches for cancer progenitor cells, and their presence is correlated with an increased risk of late recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma.23
The prognostic role of TLS in neuroendocrine neoplasms remains largely unexplored. The presence of TLS does not appear to impact prognosis in small bowel NETs.11 Further, the prognostic role of TLS remains unexplored in G1/G2 NF-PanNETs. Here, we identified the presence of TLS in G1/G2 NF-PanNETs, defined the cellular composition of these TLS and their association with tumor-infiltrating immune cells as well as the prognostic significance of TLS in a large cohort of NF-PanNETs.
This study included two independent patient cohorts. The Fudan cohort contained 182 patients who underwent surgery for histologically confirmed G1/G2 NF-PanNETs at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC), between 2006 and 2018. The external validation set comprised 125 patients with G1/G2 NF-PanNETs who underwent a pancreatectomy at an external hospital with pathology consultations performed at our institute. To study TLS in heterogeneous pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs), we enrolled 26 patients with G1/G2 functional PanNETs (22 insulinomas and 4 gastrinomas), 22 patients with G3 NF-PanNETs, and 18 patients with poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (PanNECs). All 66 patients underwent surgery and their diagnosis was histologically confirmed at FUSCC. Surgical history, clinicopathological parameters, and follow-up information were collected retrospectively from our medical record database. Patients were followed up with every 3 months for the first 2 years after surgery. Then, patients were followed up every 6 months until recurrence or death. At each follow-up, patients underwent a physical examination, laboratory investigation and contrast-enhanced CT or MRI of the chest/abdomen/pelvis. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was defined as the time from the date of surgery to the date of recurrence. OS was defined as the time from the date of surgery to the date of either death or the last follow-up. Tumors were restaged and regraded based on the 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC8th) tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system and 2017 WHO classification.
Evaluation of TLS
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens from each patient in the 182-patient Fudan cohort and 66 patients with PanNENs were prepared in 5 µm thick sections for H&E staining.24 H&E-stained sections of the 125-patient external validation set were borrowed from the pathology department at our institute. To further assess lymphocytic organization in G1/G2 NF-PanNETs, immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining was carried out as previously described,25–28 using the 182 serial sections from the Fudan cohort. IHC staining was performed to identify helper T cells (CD4, ab133616, 1:200, Abcam), cytotoxic T cells (CD8, ab172729, 1:300, Abcam), regulatory T cells (Tregs, FOXP3, ab20034, 1:800, Abcam), memory T cells (CD45RO, ab23, 1:1,000, Abcam), B cells (CD20, 24828-1-AP, 1:5,000, Proteintech), dendritic cells (DCs, CD11c, ab52632, 1:500, Abcam), natural killer cells (NK cells, anti-NCR1, ab224703, 1:1,000, Abcam), and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs, CD68, ab213363, 1:4,000, Abcam).
TLS were identified on full-face H&E slides of 307 tumors from the Fudan cohort, the external validation set, and the 26 G1/G2 functional PanNETs, 22 G3 NF-PanNETs, and 18 PanNECs tissues. Slides were reviewed by two independent observers (Dr Dan Huang and Dr Hai-Ying Zeng) for the presence and the location of TLS. When TLS were identified, the numbers of tumor-infiltrating immune cells outside the TLS were counted in G1/G2 NF-PanNET tissue by evaluating five random high-power fields (×200). Data are presented as the mean±SD.
Multispectral fluorescent IHC
Five FFPE slides from specimens, with observed TLS in the H&E-stained sections, were subjected to multispectral immunohistochemical (mIHC) staining29 30 using the Opal color kit (PerkinElmer, Hopkinton, Massachusetts, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions, to provide simultaneous detection of adaptive immune system cell types, such as CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, CD20+ B cells, and CD45RO+ memory T cells. Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI. Multiplexed color slides were imaged with a PerkinElmer Vectra automated multispectral microscope at 100× magnification and analyzed using PerkinElmer inForm Analysis Software.
Nomogram construction used a multivariate Cox model for RFS, based on TLS, WHO classification, and AJCC8th TNM stage, and was fit to the Fudan cohort. Validation was performed using bootstrap resampling; external validation was performed using the 125-patient external validation set.6 Model performance was evaluated using the concordance index (c-index) and calibration curve.31 The c-index was calculated for the WHO classification and AJCC8th TNM stage, and the two indices were compared with the c-index from the nomogram.
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (V.25.0, IBM, Armonk, New York, USA) and Stata (V.15.0, Stata Corp., Houston, Texas, USA). Nomograms were constructed using R V.3.6.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Continuous variables were compared by non-parametric tests or Student’s t-test. Categorical variables were compared by Pearson’s Χ2 test or Fisher’s test. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to estimate statistical differences in survival. Cox-regression analyses were performed to identify independent prognostic factors of RFS and OS. Variables significantly associated with RFS or OS in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis. Two-sided p values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
The clinicopathological characteristics of two patient cohorts are summarized in table 1. In the Fudan cohort, the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year recurrence rates were 12.6%, 25.3%, and 28.0%, respectively; and the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates were 100%, 96.7%, and 90.7%, respectively. More than half of the patients were women (52.2%). The median age was 53.0 years (range, 25–82 years). The median tumor size was 29.0 mm (range, 6.0–95.0 mm). Positive lymph nodes were present in 36 patients (19.8%). Vascular invasion and perineural invasion were observed in 45 (24.7%) and 39 cases (21.4%), respectively. The percentages of patients with AJCC8th TNM stages I, II, and III were 39.6%, 40.7%, and 19.8%, respectively, and WHO grades 1 and 2 were 65.9% and 34.1%, respectively.
Characteristics of TLS in G1/G2 NF-PanNETs
We defined the presence, location and cellular composition of TLS and related these to the clinicopathological characteristics of G1/G2 NF-PanNETs. TLS were located peritumorally, either just outside the tumor tissue or in the stroma. No TLS were observed in peritumoral normal pancreatic tissues. TLS were variable in size and shape, with most being oval or irregular (online supplemental figure S1), and were observed in 35.7% and 36.8% of G1/G2 NF-PanNETs in the Fudan cohort and external validation set, respectively.
To characterize the cellular composition of TLS, we used IHC to identify CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, CD20+ B cells, CD11c+ DCs, CD45RO+ memory T cells, anti-NCR1+ NK cells, FOXP3+ Tregs, and CD68+ TAMs in serial sections (figure 1A–H). CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were primarily in the parafollicular cortex, with CD4+ T cells showing more infiltration than CD8+ T cells. Most CD20+ B cells were in the center of the follicle, whereas CD11c+ DCs and CD45RO+ memory T cells were located primarily within the T-cell zone, with some dispersion into the center of the follicle. Only sporadic anti-NCR1+ NK cells were identified, and CD68+ TAMs were rarely observed. FOXP3+ Tregs were rare in both TLS and tumor tissues.
Next, we used mIHC to simultaneously detect CD45RO+, CD20+, CD4+, and CD8+ cells in G1/G2 NF-PanNET tissues and define their relationship to TLS and the tumor microenvironment (figure 2B–F). We focused on these adaptive immune cells because they were the major components of TLS based on IHC. The mIHC data reflected the IHC results, with CD45RO+ memory T cells showing more infiltration and greater dispersion into the center of the follicle in mIHC. Quantification of the cell types in the mIHC images showed that CD45RO+ memory T cells were the most common immune cells in TLS, followed by CD20+ B cells, CD4+ T cells, and CD8+ T cells (39.35%, 36.61%, 20.05%, and 3.99%, respectively, figure 2G–H). CD20+ B cells tended to be located in the center of the follicle whereas CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and CD45RO+ memory T cells were primarily located in the parafollicular zone.
Patients with G1/G2 NF-PanNETs containing TLS associated with better clinical outcomes based on clinicopathological characteristics, such as negative lymph node, absence of vascular and perineural invasion, lower TNM stage (I, II), and lower WHO grade (G1), although statistical significance was observed only for vascular invasion. Patients without vascular invasion showed a higher percentage of TLS versus patients with vascular invasion (40.88% vs 20%, p=0.011). There was no significant difference in the percentage of TLS between patients with negative or positive lymph nodes (36.30% vs 33.33%, p=0.739). Likewise, there was no significant difference in the percentage of TLS between patients with or without perineural invasion (30.77% vs 37.06%, p=0.467). Additionally, statistical significance was not reached when comparing the percentage of TLS between patients with AJCC8th TNM stage I/II or III tumors (36.99% vs 30.56%, p=0.471), and patients with WHO G1 or G2 tumors (40% vs 27.42%, p=0.093, online supplemental figure S2A).
Characteristics of TLS in G1/G2 functional PanNETs, G3 NF-PanNETs, and PanNECs
To better characterize TLS in heterogeneous PanNENs, we examined 26 G1/G2 functional PanNETs, 22 G3 NF-PanNETs, and 18 PanNECs. TLS were located peritumorally, varied in shape and size and had similar cellular composition (figure 1I–K). TLS were observed in 38.46% of G1/G2 functional PanNETs, 27.28% of G3 NF-PanNETs, and 11.11% of PanNECs. Although the percentage of TLS in G1/G2 NF-PanNETs was lower than in G1/G2 functional PanNETs and higher than in G3 NF-PanNETs, these differences did not reach statistical significance. However, the percentage of TLS in G1/G2 NF-PanNETs was significantly greater than in PanNECs (p=0.035, online supplemental figure S2B).
Relationship between tumor-infiltrating immune cells and TLS
Tumor-infiltrating CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, B cells, and CD45RO+ memory T cells are indispensable for forming immune-responsive microenvironment,32–34 whereas TAMs are associated with immune-suppressive microenvironment.12 We identified significantly higher infiltration of CD4+ T cells in G1/G2 NF-PanNETs containing more than five TLS (TLS≥5) compared with those having one to four TLS (TLS1–4), or no TLS (TLS0, p=0.031 and p=0.011, respectively). The numbers of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells (p=0.032 and p=0.014, respectively) and CD20+ B cells (p=0.031 and p<0.001, respectively) were also significantly greater in tumor tissues with TLS1–4 and TLS≥5 compared with TLS0. Additionally, the number of CD45RO+ memory T cells was significantly higher in TLS≥5 G1/G2 NF-PanNETs than TLS0 G1/G2 NF-PanNETs (p=0.048). In contrast, the number of CD68+ TAMs in TLS1–4 and TLS≥5 tumors was significantly lower than in TLS0 tumors (p=0.021 and p=0.007, respectively). Moreover, no significant differences in the numbers of tumor-infiltrating CD11c+ DCs and NK cells were uncovered based on TLS number (online supplemental figure S3). Together, these data suggested that TLS might promote immune-responsive microenvironment.
Association of the presence of TLS with survival of patients with G1/G2 NF-PanNETs
We explored the association of the presence of TLS with RFS and OS in both the Fudan cohort and external validation set to determine whether TLS might be useful in determining patient prognosis. In the Fudan cohort, median RFS was 39 months (range, 1.5–95.0 months) and median OS was 58 months (range, 10.0–96.0 months). The presence of TLS was associated with longer RFS and OS (p<0.001 and p=0.001, respectively, figure 3A,B). In the external cohort, median RFS was 37 months (range, 2.3–128.7 months) and median OS was 56 months (range, 7.6–128.7 months). The presence of TLS was associated with longer RFS and OS (p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively, figure 3C,D).
Next, we explored the correlation between the number of TLS and patient survival, and found that TLS number (TLS1–4 vs TLS≥5) did not significantly impact either RFS or OS; however, patients with any number of TLS exhibited longer RFS and OS than those without TLS (online supplemental table S1).
Multivariate survival analyses indicated that AJCC8th TNM stage, WHO classification and the presence of TLS were independent prognostic factors of RFS (HR=2.8, 95% CI: 1.79–4.27, p<0.001; HR=2.9, 95% CI: 1.57–5.22, p=0.001 and HR=0.3, 95% CI: 0.14–0.69, p=0.004, respectively) and OS (HR=2.2, 95% CI: 1.14–4.20, p=0.019; HR=3.0, 95% CI: 1.33–6.75, p=0.008 and HR=0.3, 95% CI: 0.12–0.74, p=0.009, respectively) in the Fudan cohort. Likewise, these results were confirmed in the external validation set (table 2).
Nomogram predicts the probability of 5-year RFS for resected G1/G2 NF-PanNETs
Median follow-up time was 60 months, and there were 51 recurrences in the 182-patient Fudan cohort and 32 recurrences in the 125-patient external validation set. We aimed to construct a nomogram, incorporating the presence of TLS, to predict the probability of 5-year RFS, based on the multivariate Cox model (figure 4A). The nomogram c-index on the Fudan cohort was 0.772, superior to c-indices based on the WHO classification (0.665) and AJCC8th TNM stage (0.720). The nomogram c-index on the external validation set was 0.879, which was also superior to that based on the WHO classification (0.777) and AJCC8th TNM staging (0. 807). The calibration plots for the Fudan cohort and external validation set showed good agreement between the predicted and observed 5-year recurrence-free probabilities (figure 4B,C).
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) constructed a nomogram using four variables: number of positive lymph nodes, Ki67 index, tumor diameter, and presence of vascular or perineural invasion.6 For comparison, we constructed a MSKCC-based nomogram using these same variables and applied the nomogram to the Fudan cohort and external validation set (figure 4D).6 The c-indices of the MSKCC-based nomogram on the Fudan cohort and external validation set were 0.692 and 0.719, respectively, indicating less discrimination than the new nomogram based on TLS, WHO classification and AJCC8th TNM stage. Calibration plots for the two cohorts were shown in figure 4E,F.
To better define the implications of TLS in G1/G2 NF-PanNETs, we analyzed tumors from a 182-patient Fudan cohort and a 125-patient external validation set. Tumors were examined for the presence of TLS, and when present, for their cellular composition, association with tumor-infiltrating immune cells, to provide information on the tumor-immune microenvironment, and to understand their prognostic significance. Finally, we introduced a strategy to improve clinical prognostic accuracy.
To our knowledge, this is the first study to describe the presence and prognostic significance of TLS in G1/G2 NF-PanNETs. We identified TLS in tumors from 35.7% of enrolled patients. In NF-PanNETs, the TLS were located peritumorally, either just outside the tumor tissue or in the stromal area. Interestingly, the location of TLS in NF-PanNETs was distinct from that reported for patients with pancreatitis and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).35 In chronic pancreatitis and autoimmune pancreatitis, TLS were distributed evenly in pancreatic tissues.35 In PDAC, TLS were generally located peritumorally and adjacent to vessels (ie, venules and capillaries).18 Tumor tissues were typically surrounded by peritumoral TLS with only a few cases showing intratumoral TLS. Nonetheless, the rare presence of intratumoral TLS was an independent, favorable prognostic factor in PDAC.18 36 The unique distribution of TLS in tumor/pancreatic tissues from patients with NF-PanNETs, pancreatitis, and PDAC, may reflect completely different immune microenvironment among these diseases. TLS were mainly composed of B-cell follicles with germinal centers and T-cell zones with DCs, having a distribution similar to SLO. Previous work showed that CD4+ T cells within TLS could support the differentiation of CD8+ T cells.37 DCs within TLS could present tumor antigens to the T cells located in the TLS, which could be critical for T cell-mediated anti-tumor responses.17 Consistent with Cai et al,38 we rarely detected FOXP3+ Tregs in G1/G2 NF-PanNET tissues, though the presence of Tregs in TLS has been reported to be negatively associated with the activation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, inhibiting immune response against tumors.39 In order to clearly demonstrate the cellular composition of TLS, specifically relationship to cells of adaptive immune system, we conducted multispectral immunohistochemical analysis, which supported the results of our conventional IHC staining, but provided additional information regarding the quantity and spatial relationships between different populations of immune cells.
We also showed that TLS were more likely to be detected in patients who had negative lymph node, absence of vascular and perineural invasion, lower TNM stage (I, II), and lower WHO grade (G1), although only absence of vascular invasion reached statistical significance. For better characterization of TLS in heterogeneous PanNENs, we examined other types of PanNENs, G1/G2 functional PanNETs, G3 NF-PanNETs, and PanNECs for the presence of TLS. Others have shown that the prognoses of patients with NF-PanNETs were poorer when compared to patients with functional PanNETs, especially for insulinoma, and were significantly better than patients with poorly differentiated PanNECs.40–42 We found that the percentage of TLS in G1/G2 NF-PanNETs was lower than in G1/G2 functional PanNETs, although this difference was not statistically significant. Additionally, as the tumor grade increases, the percentage of TLS decreases significantly. This supported TLS as a favorable prognostic indicator. Further, we demonstrated that immune cells derived from the adaptive immune system (ie, CD4+ T and CD8+ T cells, CD20+ B cells, and CD45RO+ memory T cells) were more abundant in tumor tissues with TLS than those without TLS. In contrast, the numbers of immune cells derived from the innate immune system (ie, CD68+ TAMs) in G1/G2 NF-PanNET tissues containing TLS were significantly lower than those lacking TLS. These findings are similar to those of previous studies,18 37 43 and indicate that TLS might allow for higher infiltration of effector immune cells, thus rendering a more effective anti-tumor immune response. Given the close correlation between the presence of TLS and the infiltration of adaptive immune cells into the tumors, TLS might serve as a potential biomarker of effective immunotherapies.
Univariate and multivariate survival analyses demonstrated that the presence of TLS in G1/G2 NF-PanNETs was an independent prognostic indicator of longer RFS and OS in both the Fudan cohort and external validation set. Surprisingly, we found the number of TLS did not impact RFS and OS. We used data from this study to construct a nomogram that accurately predicted the probability of 5-year RFS of resected G1/G2 NF-PanNETs, with better predictive ability than predictions based on WHO classification or AJCC8th TNM stage. We propose that a nomogram incorporating the presence of TLS, WHO classification, and AJCC8th TNM stage would improve personalized surveillance, facilitate the design of clinical trials, and potentially assist clinical practice.
In addition to the MSKCC nomogram, there are other prediction models of RFS in NF-PanNETs. However, these predictive models have one or more limitations, such as being derived from single-institution data, including only clinicopathological characteristics, and/or lacking validation with an external cohort. For example, Genc et al 44 proposed a new scoring system to predict recurrence in G1/G2 NF-PanNETs that included tumor grade, positive lymph nodes, and perineural invasion, but lacked an external validation set. Similarly, Ellison et al 45 developed a simple prognostic tool using grade, sex, and binary age based on a single-institution series that lacked external validation. Our institution also generated a recurrent-risk stage system based on independent predictors of recurrence in PanNETs including T stage, N stage, insulinoma and Ki67 index.41 In contrast to these models, our newly constructed nomogram includes not only clinical characteristics but also immune microenvironment components-TLS, which might help us predict the prognosis of NF-PanNETs more accurately. Overall, our data indicate that our nomogram is as good, if not better than the aforementioned prognostic models of Genc, Ellison, and our own institution.
Accumulated data suggest that TLS may be important for eliciting strong cellular and humoral immune responses. For example, Lutz et al 46 showed that TLS formed in immune-responsive patients with PDAC following GVAX (a granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor gene-modified tumor cell vaccine) treatment, whereas non-immune-responsive patients did not form TLS following GVAX treatment. Likewise, patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, who received therapeutic administration of a human papillomavirus serotype 16 vaccine, formed TLS, whereas untreated patients did not.47 These findings might provide insights on the future research about NF-PanNETs and prompt in-depth studies on the role of TLS in tumor-immune microenvironment and immunotherapies.
Several limitations exist in the current study. First, all retrospective studies have inherent limitations. Second, given the retrospective nature of the study and the low prevalence of NF-PanNETs, we relied on IHC and mIHC to analyze samples for their cellular composition rather than flow cytometry, as the fresh samples required for flow cytometry were difficult to obtain. Additionally, this study did not investigate the association among tumor mutation background, immune checkpoints molecules (ie, PD-1 and its ligands PD-L1/PD-L2) and TLS. It will be important to define the composition of tumor-immune microenvironment and dissect TLS in NF-PanNETs in the future. Finally, prospective clinical trials will be required to investigate the possibility of using TLS as a biomarker for tumors that may be more responsive to immunotherapies.
Overall, the presence of TLS in G1/G2 NF-PanNET tissues appeared to be an independent prognostic factor of RFS and OS and was suggested to represent an immune-responsive microenvironment.
The authors thank Professor Dan Huang (Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China) and Professor Hai-Ying Zeng (Department of Pathology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China) for their assistance in the pathological diagnosis of NF-PanNETs in all enrolled patients.
W-HZ, XH and H-LG contributed equally.
Contributors Wu-Hu Zhang, Wen-Quan Wang, Liang Liu and Xian-Jun Yu conceived the original idea of the study. Xuan Han, He-Li Gao, Shuai-Shuai Xu, and Tian-Jiao Li contributed to sample preparation and carried out the experiment. Wu-Hu Zhang, Shuo Li, Hua-Xiang Xu and Hao Li conducted all statistical analyses. Jiang Long, Long-Yun Ye, Xuan Lin and Chun-Tao Wu contributed to the implementation of the research and interpretation of data. All authors discussed the results, prepared, shaped the research and gave final approval of the manuscript to be published.
Funding This work was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China (81625016), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81872366, 81871941, 81827807, 81802675, 81 701 630 and 81702341), the Outstanding Academic Leader Program of the 'Technological Innovation Action Plan' of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission (18XD1401200), the Scientific Innovation Project of Shanghai Education Committee (2019-01-07-00-07-E00057), the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (19ZR1410800), the Clinical and Scientific Innovation Project of Shanghai Hospital Development Center (SHDC12018109), and the Young Talented Specialist Training Program of Shanghai.
Competing interests There are no competing interests.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Ethics approval This study was approved by the institutional research ethics committee of FUSCC. In accordance with the ethics committee’s regulations, informed consent was obtained from patients included in this study.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data availability statement All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplemental information. All data analyzed in this study are included in this published article and its supplemental materials.
Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.