Article Text

Download PDFPDF

214 The effect of Anti-PD-1 therapy on median overall survival and progression free survival in glioblastoma multiforme patients with certain tumor markers
  1. Awais Paracha and
  2. Jian Campian2
  1. 1Saint Louis University Medical School, Saint Louis, MO, USA
  2. 2Washington University, Saint Louis, MO, USA


Background Almost 1 in 6 malignant brain cancers are Glioblastoma Multiforme, relative to most other brain cancers it is the most aggressive and prevalent by the numbers.1 Even with the best treatment options median Overall Survival(OS) remains morbid at 14.6 months and Progression Free Survival(PFS) remains 6.9 months.2 Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase promoter mutations,3 Isocitrate Dehydrogenase(IDH) mutations,4 and Tumor Mutation Burden(TMB)5 are three prominent tumor markers that are known to be associated with better PFS and OS; markers like these in the presence of new therapies maybe prove crucial to the development of novel therapies. Immunotherapy has been dubbed a ‘game changer’ in certain hematological and solid malignancies. Specifically, PD1 is a glycoprotein that is a strong negative regulator of the immune system, by blocking this glycoprotein Anti-PD-1 agents harness a strong response by the immune system to fight a malignancy6. In conjunction with these new found tumor markers, Anti-PD-1 agents maybe the solution that could dramatically improve OS and PFS in these patients.

Methods The goal of this study was to retrospectively analyze patients‘ charts who had received Anti-PD-1 therapy and had TERT promoter mutations, IDH mutations, different TMBs, and other markers and to compare their OS and PFS outcomes with conventional therapies and their response to immunotherapy.

Results Upon analyzing the data the presence of a TERT promoter 124C>T mutation, IDH wildtype, and lower TMB gave much better OS and PFS after treatment in patients on Anti-PD1 therapy.

Conclusions Although this was a small study, these results certainly can be used to examine larger subsets of patients with these markers receiving immunotherapy because they had definitively better outcomes as compared to status quo treatment options.

Ethics Approval The study was approved by Washington University Ethics Board, approval number 201111001.


  1. Davis, M.E., Glioblastoma: overview of disease and treatment. Clinical journal of oncology nursing, 2016;20(5 Suppl): p. S2–S8.

  2. Stupp R, et al., Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. New England Journal of Medicine 2005;352(10): p. 987–996.

  3. Mosrati MA, et al., TERT promoter mutations and polymorphisms as prognostic factors in primary glioblastoma. Oncotarget 2015;6(18): p. 16663–16673.

  4. Chen J-R., et al., Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (IDH)1/2 Mutations as Prognostic Markers in Patients With Glioblastomas. Medicine, 2016;95(9): p. e2583–e2583.

  5. Wu Y, et al. The predictive value of tumor mutation burden on efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Oncology 2019;9:p. 1161–1161.

  6. Almåsbak H, Aarvak T, and Vemuri MC, CAR T. Cell Therapy: a game changer in cancer treatment. Journal of Immunology Research 2016;2016:p. 5474602–5474602.

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See:

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.