PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Maleki Vareki, Saman TI - High and low mutational burden tumors versus immunologically hot and cold tumors and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors AID - 10.1186/s40425-018-0479-7 DP - 2018 Dec 01 TA - Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer PG - 157 VI - 6 IP - 1 4099 - http://jitc.bmj.com/content/6/1/157.short 4100 - http://jitc.bmj.com/content/6/1/157.full SO - J Immunother Cancer2018 Dec 01; 6 AB - Tumors responding to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have a higher level of immune infiltrates and/or an Interferon (IFN) signature indicative of a T-cell-inflamed phenotype. Melanoma and lung cancer demonstrate high response rates to ICIs and are commonly referred to as “hot tumors”. These are in sharp contrast to tumors with low immune infiltrates called “cold tumors” or non-T-cell-inflamed cancers, such as those from the prostate and pancreas. Classification of tumors based on their immune phenotype can partially explain clinical response to ICIs. However, this model alone cannot fully explain the lack of response among many patients treated with ICIs.Dichotomizing tumors based on their mutation profile into high tumor mutation burden (TMB) or low TMB, such as many childhood malignancies, can also, to some extent, explain the clinical response to immunotherapy. This model mainly focuses on a tumor’s genotype rather than its immune phenotype. High TMB tumors often have higher levels of neoantigens that can be recognized by the immune system. In the current era of immunotherapy, with the lack of definitive biomarkers, we need to evaluate tumors based on both their immune phenotype and genomic mutation profile to determine which patients have a higher likelihood of responding to treatment with ICIs.