Interaction analyses for double-inhibitory KIR and KIR ligand genotypes with TTRF

TTRF
LineTreatmentGenotype GroupNumber of Events/n4 yr Fail Rate (95% CI)a %Interaction p-value
1MaintenanceKIR2DL1+/C2+ and KIR3DL1+/Bw4+17/4437 (24–54)0.694
2Maintenancenot KIR2DL1+/C2+ and KIR3DL1+/Bw4+11/3634 (19–55)
3Non-MaintenanceKIR2DL1+/C2+ and KIR3DL1+/Bw4+10/3233 (18–54)
4Non-Maintenancenot KIR2DL1+/C2+ and KIR3DL1+/Bw4+14/4731 (19–48)
5MaintenanceGroup 1: KIR2DL2+/C1+ and KIR3DL1+/Bw4+9/2245 (24–72)0.068
6MaintenanceGroup 2:notKIR2DL2+/C1+ and KIR3DL1+/Bw4+19/5832 (21–47)
7Non-MaintenanceGroup 1: KIR2DL2+/C1+ and KIR3DL1+/Bw4+4/2317 (6–44)
8Non-MaintenanceGroup 2:notKIR2DL2+/C1+ and KIR3DL1+/Bw4+20/5638 (26–54)
9MaintenanceKIR2DL3+/C1+ and KIR3DL1+/Bw4+12/3538 (26–54)0.447
10Maintenancenot KIR2DL3+/C1+ and KIR3DL1+/Bw4+16/4534 (21–51)
11Non-MaintenanceKIR2DL3+/C1+ and KIR3DL1+/Bw4+10/3725 (13–44)
12Non-MaintenancenotT KIR2DL3+/C1+ and KIR3DL1+/Bw4+14/4238 (24–57)

a95% Confidence interval; lines 5-8 (bolded text) had a p-value <0.100 and were analyzed further for associations with outcome