Table 2

Univariable and multivariable association between ETS status (with and without) and OS, PFS, TDD in HRQoL and PF for patients treated with atezolizumab from OAK and POPLAR

ETSProbability (%) at 24 months (95% CI)Univariable analysisMultivariable analysis*
NHR (95% CI)P value c NHR (95% CI)P value c
OSNo23 (19 to 29)528<0.0010.58491<0.0010.68
Yes55 (44 to 69)1350.33 (0.24 to 0.46)1250.32 (0.23 to 0.45)
PFSNo3 (2 to 6)528<0.0010.60491<0.0010.66
Yes31 (23 to 41)1350.31 (0.25 to 0.39)1250.31 (0.24 to 0.40)
TDD in HRQoLNo10 (4 to 25)5270.010.524900.280.58
Yes24 (15 to 37)1340.73 (0.57 to 0.93)1240.87 (0.66 to 1.13)
TDD in PFNo23 (17 to 30)527<0.0010.55490<0.0010.61
Yes45 (36 to 57)1340.52 (0.40 to 0.69)1240.56 (0.41 to 0.75)
  • *Multivariable analysis adjusted for baseline ECOG PS, age, sex, race, smoking status, histology, count of prior treatments, PD-L1 expression, serum LDH levels and the presence of liver, lung or brain lesions.

  • ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; HRQoL, health-related quality-of-life; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; OS, overallsurvival; PD-L1, programmed death-ligand 1; PF, physical function; PFS, progression-free survival; TDD, time to deterioration.