Table 1

Best overall response (intention-to-treat population). Responses are based on investigator best assessment across time points per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 with confirmation

Pembrolizumab + dabrafenib + trametinib n=60
n (%)
Placebo + dabrafenib + trametinib n=60
n (%)
Difference in rate,* % (95% CI)
Objective response38 (63.3)43 (71.7)−8.5 (−24.8 to 8.3)
Complete response12 (20.0)9 (15.0)5.2 (−8.8 to 18.9)
Partial response26 (43.3)34 (56.7)−13.8 (−30.9 to 4.3)
Disease control51 (85.0)56 (93.3)−8.1 (−20.1 to 3.6)
Stable disease13 (21.7)13 (21.7)0.5 (−14.6 to 15.6)
Progressive disease5 (8.3)3 (5.0)3.2 (−7.0 to 13.8)
Not evaluable2 (3.3)0 (0.0)3.4 (−2.8 to 11.6)
No assessment2 (3.3)1 (1.7)1.4 (−6.1 to 9.6)
  • *Difference in rate was based on Miettinen and Nurminen method stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (0 vs 1) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (>1.1× upper limit of normal (ULN) vs ≤1.1× ULN); because of the small number of patients enrolled in the ECOG performance status 1 and LDH ≤1.1× ULN strata, these strata were combined.

  • †Complete response + partial response.

  • ‡Complete response + partial response + stable disease.