Author | CTA (type) | Method of CTA assessment | Incidence in SS (%) |
Kakimoto et al42 | NY-ESO-1 | IHC | 59 |
MAGE-A4 | 53 | ||
Endo et al44 | NY-ESO-1 | 49 | |
Lai et al45 | NY-ESO-1 | 82 | |
Sellner et al *abstract46 | NY-ESO-1 | PCR and IHC | 60 strong + 10 weakly positive |
Ayyoub et al102 | NY-ESO-1 | PCR and IHC | 100 (n=2) |
MAGE-A4 | 100 | ||
Jungbluth et al43 | NY-ESO-1 | IHC | 80 |
MAGE-A1 | 16 | ||
CT7 (MAGEC1) | 8 | ||
Iura et al41 | NY-ESO-1 | PCR and IHC | 61 |
MAGE-A4 | 82 | ||
MAGE-A1 | 15 | ||
PRAME | 86 | ||
Antonescu et al103 | MAGE-A (unspecified subfamily) | IHC | 88 |
Jungbluth et al *abstract50 | PRAME | IHC | 100 |
Luk et al51 | PRAME | PCR | 100 |
Roszik et al52 | PRAME | Cancer Genome Atlas and Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia | 100 |
Segal et al47 | NY-ESO-1 | Microarray | 80 |
PRAME | 100 | ||
Guillou et al104 | SYT-SSX | RT-PCR | 96 and 100 (monophasic and biphasic) |
Wei et al105 | SYT-SSX | RT-PCR | 89 |
IHC, immunohistochemistry; PRAME, Preferentially Expressed Antigen In Melanoma.