Table 3

Tumor response to treatment (per investigator assessment)

No of patients (%) with respective assessmentOverallGroup 4:Group 5
ICB-experienced patients
N=221UBC
N=40
MEL
N=18
NSCLC*
N=40
UBC
N=12
Complete response (CR)3 (1.4)†1 (2.5)000
Partial response (PR)14 (6.4)†3 (7.5)1 (5.6)5 (12.5)1 (8.3)
Stable disease78 (35.5)16 (40.0)8 (44.4)14 (35.0)4 (33.3)
Progressive disease102 (46.4)18 (45.0)7 (38.9)20 (50.0)6 (50.0)
Missing or unevaluable‡23 (10.5)2 (5.0)2 (11.1)1 (2.5)1 (8.3)
Objective response rate17 (7.7)4 (10.0)1 (5.6)5 (12.5)1 (8.3)
Disease control rate95 (43.2)20 (50.0)9 (50.0)19 (47.5)5 (41.7)
  • Investigator-based RECIST assessment

  • *Histology was: 31 patients (77.5%) with adenocarcinoma, 7 patients (17.5%) with squamous carcinoma and 1 (2.5%) each with an undifferentiated or unspecified carcinoma.

  • †Two additional patients experienced pseudoprogression but turned into responders afterwards with a PR and CR, respectively.

  • ‡Patients were classified as missing or unevaluable if no post-baseline response assessments were available or all postbaseline response assessments were unevaluable.

  • ICB, immune checkpoint blocker; MEL, melanoma; N, number of patients; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; UBC, urothelial bladder cancer.