Table 2

Efficacy outcomes by IRC assessment for Cohorts 2, 4, and pooled Cohorts 2 and 4 (Full Analysis Set)

Response (RECIST V.1.1)*Cohort 2
(n=66)
Cohort 4
(n=87)
Pooled Cohorts 2+4
(N=153)
ORR, n (%)23 (34.8)25 (28.7)48 (31.4)
 (95% CI)(23.5 to 47.6)(19.5 to 39.4)(24.1 to 39.4)
Best overall response, n (%)
 CR5 (7.6)3 (3.4)8 (5.2)
 PR18 (27.3)22 (25.3)40 (26.1)
 SD24 (36.4)47 (54.0)71 (46.4)
 Non-CR/non-PD†1 (1.5)01 (0.7)
 PD15 (22.7)12 (13.8)27 (17.6)
 Non-evaluable‡3 (4.5)3 (3.4)6 (3.9)
Median DOR,§ months (range)NR (1.4+ to 45.0+)¶10.4 (1.4+ to 26.3+)NR (1.4+ to 45.0+)
Median study follow-up,** months36.623.527.6
  • *Objective response refers to patients with the best overall response of CR and PR. 95% CI for ORR was calculated using the Clopper-Pearson exact test.

  • †Patient did not have measurable target lesions by IRC and had best overall response of non-CR/non-PD per IRC assessment.

  • ‡Six patients were non-evaluable for response (five due to early death; one due to new anticancer therapy).

  • §Based on responders and using Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimates.

  • ¶Note: + refers to censored.

  • **Based on the reverse Kaplan-Meier method.

  • CR, complete response; DOR, duration of response; IRC, independent review committee; NR, not reached; ORR, objective response rate; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; SD, stable disease.