Table 2

Tumor response per independent central review and investigator assessment

EndpointConventional imaging (primary endpoint, n=63)*EndpointFDG-PET imaging (exploratory endpoint, n=55)†
Independent central reviewInvestigator assessmentIndependent central reviewInvestigator assessment
ORR, n (%)39 (61.9)40 (63.5)ORR, n (%)35 (63.6)38 (69.1)
95% CI‡48.8–73.950.4–75.395% CI‡49.6–76.255.2–80.9
Complete response, n (%)14 (22.2)12 (19.0)Complete metabolic response, n (%)17 (30.9)20 (36.4)
Partial response, n (%)25 (39.7)28 (44.4)Partial metabolic response, n (%)18 (32.7)18 (32.7)
Stable disease, n (%)7 (11.1)6 (9.5)Stable metabolic disease, n (%)5 (9.1)2 (3.6)
Non-complete response/non-progressive disease, n (%)3 (4.8)
Progressive disease, n (%)9 (14.3)11 (17.5)Progressive metabolic disease, n (%)3 (5.5)2 (3.6)
Not evaluable,§ n (%)5 (7.9)6 (9.5)Not evaluable,§ n (%)12 (21.8)13 (23.6)
Disease control rate, n (%)49 (77.8)46 (73.0)
95% CI‡65.5–87.360.3–83.4
Durable disease control rate, n (%)48 (76.2)45 (71.4)
95% CI‡63.8–86.058.7–82.1
Number of doses, median (range)11 (1–24)
Duration of exposure, median (range), weeks47.4 (4.0–97.0)
Follow-up, median (range), months22.4 (1.0–39.8)
  • Data cut-off date: 20 April 2022.

  • *Conventional imaging data were reviewed first to establish the primary endpoint, and FDG-PET data were subsequently reviewed for the exploratory endpoint.

  • †Excludes patients from Germany as PET scans were not required for patients enrolled in Germany.

  • ‡Clopper-Pearson exact CI.

  • §Includes missing and unknown tumor response.

  • FDG-PET, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography; NA, not applicable; ORR, objective response rate; PET, positron emission tomography.