Abstract
Tolerance strategies are cost-reduction mechanisms that enable organisms to recover some of the fitness lost to damage, but impose limited or no cost on antagonists. They are frequently invoked in studies of plant–herbivore and of host–parasite interactions, but the possible roles of tolerance in mutualism (interspecific cooperation) have yet to be thoroughly examined. This review identifies candidate roles for tolerance in the evolution, maintenance and breakdown of mutualism. Firstly, by reducing the cost of damage, tolerance provides a key pathway by which pre-mutualistic hosts can reduce the cost of association with their parasites, promoting cooperation. This holds for the evolution of ‘evolved dependency’ type mutualism, where a host requires an antagonist that does not direct any reward to their partner for some resource, and of ‘outright mutualism’, where participants directly trade benefits. Secondly, in outright mutualism, tolerance might maintain cooperation by reducing the cost of a persisting negative trait in a symbiotic partner. Finally, the evolution of tolerance might also provide a pathway out of mutualism because the host could evolve a cheaper alternative to continued cooperation with its mutualistic partner, permitting autonomy. A key consequence of tolerance is that it contrasts with partner choice mechanisms that impose large costs on cheats, and I highlight understanding any trade-off between tolerance and partner choice as an important research topic in the evolution of cooperation. I conclude by identifying tolerance as part of a more general phenomenon of co-adaptation in mutualism and parasitism that drives the evolution of the cost/benefit ratio from the interaction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aanen DK, Hoekstra RF (2007) The evolution of obligate mutualism: if you can't beat 'em, join 'em. Trends Ecol Evol 22:506–509
Agrawal AA (2000) Overcompensation of plants in response to herbivory and the by-product benefits of mutualism. Trends Plant Sci 5:309–313
Agrawal AA, Karban R (1997) Domatia mediate plant-arthropod mutualism. Nature 387:562–563
Axelrod R, Hamilton WD (1981) The evolution of cooperation. Science 211:1390–1396
Backhed F, Ley RE, Sonnenburg JL, Peterson DA, Gordon JI (2005) Host–bacterial mutualism in the human intestine. Science 211:1390–1396
Bergström CT, Bronstein JL, Bshary R, Connor RC, Daly M, Frank SA, Gintis H, Keller L, Leimar O, Noë R, Queller DC (2003) Group report: interspecific mutualism. Puzzles and predictions. In: Hammerstein P (ed) Genetic and cultural evolution of cooperation. MIT Press, Massachusetts, pp 241–256
Bilbrough CJ, Richards JH (1993) Growth of sagebrush and bitterbrush following simulated winter browsing—mechanisms of tolerance. Ecology 74:481–492
Boots M (2008) Fight or learn to live with the consequences? Trends Ecol Evol 23:248–250
Bronstein JL (1994) Conditional outcomes in mutualistic interactions. Trends Ecol Evol 9:214–217
Brown JH (1983) Interaction and coevolution—Thompson, Jn. Science 220:1043–1043
Bshary R, Grutter AS (2002a) Asymmetric cheating opportunities and partner control in a cleaner fish mutualism. Anim Behav 63:547–555
Bshary R, Grutter AS (2002b) Experimental evidence that partner choice is a driving force in the payoff distribution among cooperators or mutualists: the cleaner fish case. Ecol Letts 5:130–136
Bshary R, Schaffer D (2002) Choosy reef fish select cleaner fish that provide high-quality service. Anim Behav 63:557–564
Bshary R, Bergmüller R (2008) Distinguishing four fundamental approaches to the evolution of helping. J Evol Biol 21:405–420
Bull JJ, Rice WR (1991) Distinguishing mechanisms for the evolution of cooperation. J Theo Biol 149:63–74
Christy JH (1995) Mimicry, mate choice, and the sensory trap hypothesis. Am Nat 146:171–181
Clay K (1991) Parasitic castration of plants by fungi. Trends Ecol Evol 6:141–172
Clay K, Schardl C (2002) Evolutionary origins and ecological consequences of endophyte symbiosis with grasses. Am Nat 160:S99–S127
Connor RC (1986) Pseudo-reciprocity—investing in mutualism. Anim Behav 34:1562–1566
Connor R (2007) Invested, extracted and byproduct benefits: a modified scheme for the evolution of cooperation. Behav Processes 76:109–113
Davidson DW, McKey D (1993) The evolutionary ecology of symbiotic ant–plant relationships. J Hym Res 2:13–83
De Mazancourt C, Loreau M, Dieckmann U (2005) Understanding mutualism when there is adaptation to the partner. J Ecol 93:305–314
Doebeli M, Knowlton N (1998) The evolution of interspecific mutualism. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 95:8676–8680
Edinger BB (1985) Conditional mutualism in three aphid-tending ants. Bull Ecol Soc Am 66:168
Edwards DP, Arauco R, Hassall M, Sutherland WJ, Chamberlain K, Wadhams LJ, Yu DW (2007) Protection in an ant–plant mutualism: an adaptation or a sensory trap? Anim Behav 74:377–385
Edwards DP, Yu DW (2007) The roles of sensory traps in the origin, maintenance, and breakdown of mutualism. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1321–1327
Edwards DP, Yu DW (2008) Tolerating castration by hiding flowers in plain sight. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:95–102
Edwards DP, Hassall M, Sutherland WJ, Yu DW (2006) Selection for protection in an ant–plant mutualism: host sanctions, host modularity and the principal-agent game. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:595–602
Espinosa EG, Fornoni J (2006) Host tolerance does not impose selection on natural enemies. New Phytologist 170:609–614
Faeth SH, Sullivan TJ (2003) Mutualistic asexual endophytes in a native grass are usually parasitic. Am Nat 161:310–325
Fay PA, Hartnett DC, Knapp AK (1996) Plant tolerance of gall-insect attack and gall-insect performance. Ecology 77:521–534
Fenn K, Baxter M (2004) Are filarial nematode Wolbachia obligate mutualist symbionts? Trends Ecol Evol 19:163–166
Ferdy JB, Godelle B (2005) Diversification of transmission modes and the evolution of mutualism. Am Nat 166:613–627
Fischer MK, Shingleton AW (2001) Host plant and ants influence the honeydew sugar composition of aphids. Funct Ecol 15:544–550
Fischer MK, Hoffmann KH, Völkl W (2001) Competition for mutualists in an ant–Homopteran interaction mediated by hierarchies of ant attendance. Oikos 92:531–541
Fornoni J, Núñez-Farfán J, Valverde PL, Rausher MD (2004) Evolution of mixed strategies of plant defense allocation against natural enemies. Evolution 58:1685–1695
Foster KR, Wenseleers T (2006) A general model for the evolution of mutualisms. J Evol Biol 19:1283–1293
Foster WA, Rhoden PK (1998) Soldiers effectively defend aphid colonies against predators in the field. Anim Behav 55:761–765
Frank SA (1996) Host–symbiont conflict over the mixing of symbiotic lineages. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:339–344
Frank SA (2003) Perspective: repression of competition and the evolution of cooperation. Evolution 57:693–705
Ghazoul J (2001) Can floral repellents pre-empt potential ant–plant conflicts? Ecol Letts 4:295–299
Gronemeyer PA, Dilger BJ, Bouzat JL, Paige KN (1997) The effects of herbivory on paternal fitness in scarlet gilia: better moms also make better pops. Am Nat 150:592–602
Grutter AS (2001) Parasite infection rather than tactile stimulation is the proximate cause of cleaning behaviour in reef fish. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1361–1365
Grutter AS, Bshary R (2003) Cleaner wrasse prefer client mucus: support for partner control mechanisms in cleaning interactions. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:S242–S244
Hamilton WD (1964a) The genetical evolution of social behaviour 1. J Theo Biol 7:1–16
Hamilton WD (1964b) The genetical evolution of social behaviour 2. J Theo Biol 7:17–52
Inouye DW (1983) The ecology of nectar robbing. In: Bentley B, Elias T (eds) The biology of nectarines. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 153–173
Janzen DH (1980) When is it coevolution. Evolution 34:611–612
Jaremo J, Tuomi J, Nilsson P, Lennartsson T (1999) Plant adaptations to herbivory: mutualistic versus antagonistic coevolution. Oikos 84:313–320
Johnstone RA, Bshary R (2008) Mutualism, market effects and partner control. J Evol Biol 21:879–888
Keeler KH (1985) Cost:benefit models of mutualism. In: Boucher DH (ed) The biology of mutualism, ecology and evolution. Oxford University Press, England, pp 100–127
Kiers ET, Rousseau RA, West SA, Denison RF (2003) Host sanctions and the legume-rhizobium mutualism. Nature 425:78–81
Koskela T, Puustinen S, Salonen V, Mutikainen P (2002) Resistance and tolerance in a host plant–holoparasitic plant interaction: genetic variation and costs. Evolution 56:899–908
Leimar O, Connor RC (2003) By-product benefits, reciprocity and pseudoreciprocity in mutualism. In: Hammerstein P (ed) Genetic and cultural evolution of cooperation. MIT Press, Massachusetts, pp 203–222
Leimu R, Koricheva J (2006) A meta-analysis of tradeoffs between plant tolerance and resistance to herbivores: combining the evidence from ecological and agricultural studies. Oikos 112:1–9
Lennartsson T, Tuomi J, Nilsson P (1997) Evidence for an evolutionary history of overcompensation in the grassland biennial Gentianella campestris (Gentianaceae). Am Nat 149:1147–1155
Lennartsson T, Nilsson P, Tuomi J (1998) Induction of overcompensation in the field gentian, Gentianella campestris. Ecology 79:1061–1072
Maloof JE, Inouye DW (2000) Are nectar robbers cheaters or mutualists? Ecology 81:2651–2661
Mauricio R, Rausher MD, Burdick DS (1997) Variation in the defense strategies of plants: are resistance and tolerance mutually exclusive? Ecology 78:1301–1311
McCall AC, Irwin RE (2006) Florivory: the intersection of pollination and herbivory. Ecol Letts 9:1351–1365
Medel R (2001) Assessment of correlational selection on tolerance and resistance traits in a host plant-parasitic plant interaction. Evol Ecol 15:37–52
Miller MR, White A, Boots M (2006) The evolution of parasites in response to tolerance in their hosts: the good, the bad, and apparent commensalism. Evolution 60:945–956
Noë R, Hammerstein P (1994) Biological markets—supply-and-demand determine the effect of partner choice in cooperation, mutualism and mating. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 35:1–11
Núñez-Farfán J, Fornoni J, Valverde PL (2007) The evolution or resistance and tolerance to herbivores. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 38:541–566
Oliver TH, Leather SR, Cook JM (2009) Tolerance traits and the stability of mutualism. Oikos 118:346–352. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.17045.x
Paige KN (1999) Regrowth following ungulate herbivory in Ipomopsis aggregata: geographic evidence for overcompensation. Oecologia 118:316–323
Paige KN, Whitham TG (1987) Flexible life-history traits—shifts by scarlet gilia in response to pollinator abundance. Ecology 68:1691–1695
Pannebakker BA, Loppin B, Elemans CPH, Humblot L, Vavre F (2007) Parasitic inhibition of cell death facilitates symbiosis. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 104:213–215
Pellmyr O, Huth CJ (1994) Evolutionary stability of mutualism between yuccas and yucca moths. Nature 372:257–260
Råberg L, Sim D, Read AF (2007) Disentangling genetic variation for resistance and tolerance to infectious diseases in animals. Science 318:812–814
Råberg L, Graham AL, Read AF (2009) Decomposing health: tolerance and resistance to parasites in animals. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 364:37–49
Raine NE, Willmer P, Stone GN (2002) Spatial structuring and floral avoidance behavior prevent ant–pollinator conflict in a Mexican ant-acacia. Ecology 83:3086–3096
Redman RS, Dunigan DD, Rodriguez RJ (2001) Fungal symbiosis from mutualism to parasitism: who controls the outcome, host or invader? New Phytologist 151:705–716
Restif O, Koella JC (2003) Shared control of epidemiological traits in a coevolutionary model of host–parasite interactions. Am Nat 161:827–836
Restif O, Koella JC (2004) Concurrent evolution of resistance and tolerance to pathogens. Am Nat 164:E90–E102
Richardson SC (2004a) Are nectar-robbers mutualists or antagonists? Oecologia 139:246–254
Richardson SC (2004b) Benefits and costs of floral visitors to Chilopsis linearis: pollen deposition and stigma closure. Oikos 107:363–375
Rosenthal JP, Kotanen PM (1994) Terrestrial plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends Ecol Evol 9:145–148
Roy BA, Kirchner JW (2000) Evolutionary dynamics of pathogen resistance and tolerance. Evolution 54:51–63
Sachs JL, Simms EL (2006) Pathways to mutualism breakdown. Trends Ecol Evol 21:585–592
Sachs JL, Mueller UG, Wilcox TP, Bull JJ (2004) The evolution of cooperation. Quart Rev Biol 79:135–160
Saikkonen K, Wali P, Helander M, Faeth SH (2004) Evolution of endophyte–plant symbioses. Trends Plant Sci 9:275–280
Shapiro JM, Addicott JF (2003) Regulation of moth-yucca mutualisms: mortality of eggs in oviposition-induced ‘damage zones’. Ecol Letts 6:440–447
Shingleton AW, Foster WA (2000) Ant tending influences soldier production in a social aphid. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:1863–1868
Siepielski AM, Benkman CW (2007) Extreme environmental variation sharpens selection that drives the evolution of a mutualism. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:1799–1805
Simms EL, Triplett J (1994) Costs and benefits of plant-responses to disease-resistance and tolerance. Evolution 48:1973–1985
Smithson A, Gigord LD (2003) The evolution of empty flowers revisited. Am Nat 161:537–552
Stinchcombe JR (2002) Can tolerance traits impose selection on herbivores? Evol Ecol 16:595–602
Stowe KA, Marquis RJ, Hochwender CG, Simms EL (2000) The evolutionary ecology of tolerance to consumer damage. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 31:565–595
Strauss SY, Agrawal AA (1999) The ecology and evolution of plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends Ecol Evol 14:179–185
Stradler B, Dixon AFG (2005) Ecology and evolution of aphid–ant interactions. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 36:345–372
Takeda S, Kinomura K, Sakurai H (1982) Effects of ant-attendance on the honeydew excretion and larviposition of the cowpea aphid. Appl Entomol Zool 17:133–135
Thompson JN (1982) Interaction and coevolution. Wiley, New York
Thompson JN, Cunningham BM (2002) Geographic structure and dynamics of coevolutionary selection. Nature 417:735–738
Tiffin P (2000) Are tolerance, avoidance, and antibiosis evolutionarily and ecologically equivalent responses of plants to herbivores? Am Nat 155:128–138
Wambua S, Mwangi TW, Kortok M, Uyoga SM, Macharia AW, Mwacharo JK, Weatherall DJ, Snow RW, Marsh K, Williams TN (2006) The effect of alpha(+)-thalassaemia on the incidence of malaria and other diseases in children living on the coast of Kenya. Plos Med 3:643–651
Way MJ (1963) Mutualism between ants and honeydew-producing Homoptera. Ann Rev Entomol 8:307–344
West SA, Griffin AS, Gardner A (2007) Evolutionary explanations for cooperation. Current Biol 17:R661–R672
West SA, Kiers ET, Pen I, Denison RF (2002a) Sanctions and mutualism stability: when should less beneficial mutualists be tolerated? J Evol Biol 15:830–837
West SA, Kiers ET, Simms EL, Denison RF (2002b) Sanctions and mutualism stability: why do rhizobia fix nitrogen? Proc R Soc Lond B 269:685–694
Wise MJ, Cummins JJ (2006) Strategies of Solanum carolinense for regulating maternal investment in response to foliar and floral herbivory. J Ecol 94:629–636
Woolhouse MEJ, Webster JP, Domingo E, Charlesworth B, Levin BR (2002) Biological and biomedical implications of the co-evolution of pathogens and their hosts. Nat Genet 32:569–577
Yao I, Akimoto S (2001) Ant attendance changes the sugar composition of the honeydew of the drepanosiphid aphid Tuberculatus quercicola. Oecologia 128:36–43
Yao I, Akimoto S (2002) Flexibility in the composition and concentration of amino acids in honeydew of the drepanosiphid aphid Tuberculatus quercicola. Ecol Entomol 27:745–752
Yao I, Shibao H, Akimoto S (2000) Costs and benefits of ant attendance to the drepanosiphid aphid Tuberculatus quercicola. Oikos 89:3–10
Yu DW (2001) Parasites of mutualisms. Biol J Linn Soc 72:529–546
Yu DW, Wilson HB, Pierce NE (2001) An empirical model of species coexistence in a spatially structured environment. Ecology 82:1761–1771
Yu DW, Pierce NE (1998) A castration parasite of an ant-plant mutualism. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:375–382
Yu DW, Ridley J, Jousselin E, Herre EA, Compton SG, Cook JM, Moore JC, Weiblen GD (2004a) Oviposition strategies, host coercion and the stable exploitation of figs by wasps. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:1185–1195
Yu DW, Wilson HB, Frederickson ME, Palomino W, De la Colina R, Edwards DP, Balareso AA (2004b) Experimental demonstration of species coexistence enabled by dispersal limitation. J Anim Ecol 73:1102–1114
Acknowledgements
I thank Kevin Foster, Douglas Yu, Tom Fayle, William Foster and two anonymous referees for comments and discussions that have greatly improved the manuscript and the Leverhulme Trust for a research grant.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Edwards, D.P. The roles of tolerance in the evolution, maintenance and breakdown of mutualism. Naturwissenschaften 96, 1137–1145 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-009-0559-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-009-0559-0