Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of the CCR5 gene polymorphism on the survival of metastatic melanoma patients receiving immunotherapy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Chemokines influence both tumor progression and anti-tumor immune response. A 32-bp-deletion polymorphism in the chemokine receptor 5 gene (CCR5Δ32) has been shown to result in a non-functional protein. This study was aimed at evaluating the potential impact of this gene polymorphism on disease progression and treatment outcome in patients with melanoma.

Patients and methods

CCR5 genotyping was performed by PCR on DNA extracted from serum samples of 782 cutaneous melanoma patients with known disease history and long-term clinical follow-up. Genotypes were correlated with patient survival and types of treatment.

Results

Of 782 melanoma patients, 90 (11.5%) were heterozygous and 12 (1.5%) were homozygous for CCR5Δ32. Analyzing the complete cohort, the disease-specific survival from date of primary diagnosis was not influenced by CCR5 status. Similarly, no significant impact could be detected on the treatment outcome of stage III patients. In 139 stage IV patients receiving immunotherapy, CCR5Δ32 was associated with a decreased survival compared to patients not carrying the deletion (median 12.5 vs. 20.3 months, P = 0.029). Multivariate analysis revealed the CCR5 genotype as an independent factor impacting disease-specific survival in this patient population (P = 0.002), followed by gender (P = 0.019) and pathological classification of the primary (pT; P = 0.022).

Conclusion

The presence of the CCR5Δ32 polymorphism in patients with stage IV melanoma results in a decreased survival following immunotherapy and may help to select patients less likely to benefit from this type of treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cyster JG (1999) Chemokines and cell migration in secondary lymphoid organs. Science 286:2098–2102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Murphy PM, Baggiolini M, Charo IF et al (2000) International union of pharmacology. XXII. Nomenclature for chemokine receptors. Pharmacol Rev 52:145–176

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dias S, Choy M, Rafii S (2001) The role of CXC chemokines in the regulation of tumor angiogenesis. Cancer Invest 19:732–738

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Coussens LM, Werb Z (2002) Inflammation and cancer. Nature 420:860–867

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Payne AS, Cornelius LA (2002) The role of chemokines in melanoma tumor growth and metastasis. J Invest Dermatol 118:915–922

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Luboshits G, Shina S, Kaplan O et al (1999) Elevated expression of the CC chemokine regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES) in advanced breast carcinoma. Cancer Res 59:4681–4687

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Robinson SC, Scott KA, Wilson JL, Thompson RG, Proudfoot AE, Balkwill FR (2003) A chemokine receptor antagonist inhibits experimental breast tumor growth. Cancer Res 63:8360–8365

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mrowietz U, Schwenk U, Maune S et al (1999) The chemokine RANTES is secreted by human melanoma cells and is associated with enhanced tumour formation in nude mice. Br J Cancer 79:1025–1031

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lavergne E, Combadiere C, Iga M et al (2004) Intratumoral CC chemokine ligand 5 overexpression delays tumor growth and increases tumor cell infiltration. J Immunol 173:3755–3762

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang X, Lu P, Fujii C et al (2006) Essential contribution of a chemokine, CCL3, and its receptor, CCR1, to hepatocellular carcinoma progression. Int J Cancer 118:1869–1876

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang Y, Paxton WA, Wolinsky SM et al (1996) The role of a mutant CCR5 allele in HIV-1 transmission and disease progression. Nat Med 2:1240–1243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Galvani AP, Novembre J (2005) The evolutionary history of the CCR5-Delta32 HIV-resistance mutation. Microbes Infect 7:302–329

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Martinson JJ, Chapman NH, Rees DC, Liu YT, Clegg JB (1997) Global distribution of the CCR5 gene 32-basepair deletion. Nat Genet 16:100–103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Galvani AP, Slatkin M (2003) Evaluating plague and smallpox as historical selective pressures for the CCR5-Delta 32 HIV-resistance allele. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:15276–15279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Essner R, Lee HT, Itakura T, Huynh Y, Zogakis T, Morton DL (2005) Somatic gene mutations predict outcome of patients receiving adjuvant active specific immunotherapy after resection of stage IV melanoma. ASCO annual meeting 2005

  16. Balch CM, Buzaid AC, Soong SJ et al (2001) Final version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma. J Clin Oncol 19:3635–3648

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Efron B (1977) The efficiency of Cox’s likelihood function for censored data, 72 edn. pp 557–565

  18. Therneau TM, Grambsch PM, Fleming TR (1990) Martingale-based residuals for survival models. Biometrika 77:147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Thurner B, Haendle I, Roder C et al (1999) Vaccination with mage-3A1 peptide-pulsed mature, monocyte-derived dendritic cells expands specific cytotoxic T cells and induces regression of some metastases in advanced stage IV melanoma. J Exp Med 190:1669–1678

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Schadendorf D, Ugurel S, Schuler-Thurner B et al (2006) Dacarbazine (DTIC) versus vaccination with autologous peptide-pulsed dendritic cells (DC) in first-line treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma: a randomized phase III trial of the DC study group of the DeCOG. Ann Oncol 17:563–570

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Luiten RM, Kueter EW, Mooi W et al (2005) Immunogenicity, including vitiligo, and feasibility of vaccination with autologous GM-CSF-transduced tumor cells in metastatic melanoma patients. J Clin Oncol 23:8978–8991

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Komenaka I, Hoerig H, Kaufman HL (2004) Immunotherapy for melanoma. Clin Dermatol 22:251–265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Essner R, Lee JH, Itakura H, Huynh Y, Scheri R, Morton D (2006) Chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) {Delta}32 base pair somatic gene deletions from PBM predict survival of patients with advanced stage (IV) melanoma. J Clin Oncol (Meeting Abstracts) 24:10056

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Grant support: This study was supported by the Wilhelm Sander Stiftung (# 2006.054.1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jürgen C. Becker.

Additional information

Selma Ugurel and David Schrama have contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ugurel, S., Schrama, D., Keller, G. et al. Impact of the CCR5 gene polymorphism on the survival of metastatic melanoma patients receiving immunotherapy. Cancer Immunol Immunother 57, 685–691 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-007-0407-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-007-0407-z

Keywords

Navigation