Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Treatment selection for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: identification of features favoring upfront IL-2-based immunotherapy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The availability of approved agents with distinct mechanisms of action (immunotherapy, vascular endothelial growth factor pathway, and mTOR inhibitors) has complicated treatment decisions for patients with advanced kidney cancer. High-dose IL-2 therapy is the only treatment that can produce durable complete responses; however, it has significant side effects and the vast majority of patients do not benefit. Thus, identifying the optimal patients to receive first-line IL-2 therapy is a priority. Past studies have identified some clinical features that might be associated with benefit from IL-2-based immunotherapy. Subsequent investigations of tumors from patients treated with IL-2 suggested that response was unlikely in patients with tumors with papillary features or low carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) expression. A model combining histologic features and CAIX expression separated patients into two groups of roughly equal size, with 96% of long-term responding patients being in the favorable prognostic group. This model is currently undergoing prospective validation. More recent studies involving gene expression profiling and array CGH have begun to identify additional features that might predict response to IL-2 therapy. Taken together, these data offer the possibility to limit the use of this toxic therapy to those most likely to benefit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Escudier B, Pluzanska A, Koralewski P, et al. Bevacizumab plus interferon alfa-2a for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a randomised, double-blind phase III trial. Lancet. 2007;370(9605):2103–11. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61904-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Tomczak P, et al. Sunitinib versus interferon alfa in matastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(2):115–24. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa065044.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hudes G, Carducci M, Tomczak P, et al. Temsirolimus, interferon alfa, or both for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(22):2271–81. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa066838.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Motzer RJ, Escudier B, Oudard S, et al. Efficacy of everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase III trial. Lancet. 2008;372(9637):427–9. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61039-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McDermott DF, Regan MM, Clark JI, et al. Randomized phase III trial of high-dose interleukin-2 versus subcutaneous interleukin-2 and interferon in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(1):133–41. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.03.206.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang JC, Sherry RM, Stienberg SM, et al. A three-arm randomized comparison of high and low dose intravenous and subcutaneous interleukin-2 in the treatment of metastatic renal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:3127. doi:10.1200/JCO.2003.02.122.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schwarzberg T, Regan MM, Liu V, et al. Retrospective analysis of interleukin-2 therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who had received prior antiangiogenic therapy. J Immunother. 2007;30(8):877.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Motzer RJ, Bacik J, Murphy BA, Russo P, Mazumdar M. Interferon-alfa as a comparative treatment for clinical trials of new therapies against advanced renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(1):289–96. doi:10.1200/JCO.20.1.289.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Upton MP, Parker RA, Youmans A, McDermott DF, Atkins MB. Histologic predictors of renal cell carcinoma response to interleukin-2 based therapy. J Immunother. 2005;28(5):488–95. doi:10.1097/01.cji.0000170357.14962.9b.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cangiano T, Liao J, Naitoh J, Dorey F, Figlin R, Belldegrun A. Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma: biologic behavior, prognosis, and response to combined surgical resection and immunotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(2):523–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Motzer RJ, Bacik J, Mariani T, Russo P, Mazumdar M, Reuter V. Treatment outcome and survival associated with metastatic renal cell carcinoma of non-clear-cell histology. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(9):2376–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Grabmaier K, A de Weijert MC, Verhaegh GW, Schalken JA, Oosterwijk E. Strict regulation of CAIX(G250/MN) by HIF-1alpha in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Oncogene. 2004;23(33):5624–31. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1207764.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bui MH, Seligson D, Han KR, et al. Carbonic anhydrase IX is an independent predictor of survival in advanced renal clear cell carcinoma: implications for prognosis and therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9(2):802–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Atkins M, Regan M, McDermott D, et al. Carbonic anhydrase IX expression predicts outcome of interleukin 2 therapy for renal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11(10):3714–21. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2019.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pantuck AJ, Fang Z, Liu X, et al. Gene expression and tissue microarray analysis of interleukin-2 complete responders in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23(16S, pt 1):abstract 4535.

  16. Jaeger E, Waldman F, Roydasgupta R, et al. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) identifies chromosomal imbalances between interleukin-2 complete and non-responders. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(15S):abstract 5043.

  17. Libermann TA, Bhasin M, Joseph MG, et al. Gene expression profiling signatures associated with RCC response to IL-2 therapy. J Immunother. 2008;31(9):958.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by DF/HCC Renal Cancer SPORE-NIH/NCI P50CA101942. Michael B. Atkins has served as a consultant for Antigenics, Aveo, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genetech, Novartis, Onyx, and Wyeth and has received research funding from Bayer and Novartis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael B. Atkins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Atkins, M.B. Treatment selection for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: identification of features favoring upfront IL-2-based immunotherapy. Med Oncol 26 (Suppl 1), 18–22 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-008-9148-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-008-9148-x

Keywords

Navigation