Elsevier

The Lancet Oncology

Volume 16, Issue 5, May 2015, Pages 569-582
The Lancet Oncology

Articles
Molecular subgroups of atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumours in children: an integrated genomic and clinicopathological analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70114-2Get rights and content

Summary

Background

Rhabdoid brain tumours, also called atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumours, are lethal childhood cancers with characteristic genetic alterations of SMARCB1/hSNF5. Lack of biological understanding of the substantial clinical heterogeneity of these tumours restricts therapeutic advances. We integrated genomic and clinicopathological analyses of a cohort of patients with atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumours to find out the molecular basis for clinical heterogeneity in these tumours.

Methods

We obtained 259 rhabdoid tumours from 37 international institutions and assessed transcriptional profiles in 43 primary tumours and copy number profiles in 38 primary tumours to discover molecular subgroups of atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumours. We used gene and pathway enrichment analyses to discover group-specific molecular markers and did immunohistochemical analyses on 125 primary tumours to evaluate clinicopathological significance of molecular subgroup and ASCL1-NOTCH signalling.

Findings

Transcriptional analyses identified two atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumour subgroups with differential enrichment of genetic pathways, and distinct clinicopathological and survival features. Expression of ASCL1, a regulator of NOTCH signalling, correlated with supratentorial location (p=0·004) and superior 5-year overall survival (35%, 95% CI 13–57, and 20%, 6–34, for ASCL1-positive and ASCL1-negative tumours, respectively; p=0·033) in 70 patients who received multimodal treatment. ASCL1 expression also correlated with superior 5-year overall survival (34%, 7–61, and 9%, 0–21, for ASCL1-positive and ASCL1-negative tumours, respectively; p=0·001) in 39 patients who received only chemotherapy without radiation. Cox hazard ratios for overall survival in patients with differential ASCL1 enrichment treated with chemotherapy with or without radiation were 2·02 (95% CI 1·04–3·85; p=0·038) and 3·98 (1·71–9·26; p=0·001). Integrated analyses of molecular subgroupings with clinical prognostic factors showed three distinct clinical risk groups of tumours with different therapeutic outcomes.

Interpretation

An integration of clinical risk factors and tumour molecular groups can be used to identify patients who are likely to have improved long-term radiation-free survival and might help therapeutic stratification of patients with atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumours.

Funding

C17 Research Network, Genome Canada, b.r.a.i.n.child, Mitchell Duckman, Tal Doron and Suri Boon foundations.

Introduction

CNS rhabdoid tumours, also called atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumours, are highly malignant neoplasms arising in very young children, with a median age of 18–22 months at diagnosis, and, until recently, were thought to be fatal.1 Although the overall prognosis of patients with these tumours remains poor, with most patients living for less than 1 year from diagnosis, recent application of intensified multimodal therapy with whole craniospinal irradiation2, 3, 4 or high-dose chemotherapy with stem-cell rescue1, 3, 5, 6, 7 has improved survival. However, treatment intensification, particularly use of neuroaxis radiation, is associated with substantial acute and life-long physiological and neurological sequelae in these patients. Remarkably, long-term survival has been reported in some children with atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumours treated without neuroaxis radiation.5, 6, 8 These findings draw attention to the substantial clinical heterogeneity of atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumours and the need to avoid radiation and its associated neurotoxicity, without compromising survival. The biological basis for clinical heterogeneity in atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumours remains to be elucidated; this gap in knowledge has impeded development of therapeutic models and prospective treatment models.

Atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumours have histological features and hallmark alterations associated with the SMARCB1 (INI1/hSNF5/BAF47) tumour suppressor locus on chromosome 22q11.23 that are also detected in rhabdoid tumours arising in other locations.9, 10 Up to 35% of patients with the CNS rhabdoid tumours have germline SMARCB1 alterations and the rhabdoid predisposition syndrome characterised by development of several rhabdoid tumours.11, 12, 13 The biological relation between atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumours and non-CNS rhabdoid tumours remains unclear; however, atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumours are thought to develop from SMARCB1 loss in restricted, undefined, neural precursors. SMARCB1 is a constitutive component of the ubiquitous SWI/SNF chromatin remodelling complex that has specific functions in neural development.14 Results of animal studies show that loss of Snf is sufficient for the development of rhabdoid tumours, but intrinsic rhabdoid brain tumours have not been shown in Snf5–/– mice.15, 16, 17 Although the findings of studies of small cohorts suggest molecular heterogeneity might underlie the clinical range of atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumours, cumulative genomic analyses including whole-exome sequencing studies have shown SMARCB1 loss as the only recurrent genetic event in atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumours.18, 19 Reconciling clinical heterogeneity with tumour biology has been challenging for atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumours because it is a rare disease and there are only a few biological and clinical studies, thus determinants of survival and therapeutic responses remain poorly defined for patients. Furthermore, previous studies have been done on small, mixed cohorts of CNS and non-CNS rhabdoid tumours, and perhaps have lacked the power needed to define the genetic and molecular ranges of atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumours. In this study, we did integrated molecular and clinicopathological analyses of atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumours to define clinically relevant molecular classes of these tumours.

Section snippets

Patients and study design

This study was a retrospective analysis, with patients previously enrolled from 37 international institutions (appendix). The only inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumours and centralised pathological review to confirm diagnosis. Tumour samples and clinical information were obtained with consent as per protocols approved by the hospital research ethics boards at participating institutions; all samples were reassessed centrally through a multistep

Results

We did unsupervised consensus cluster analyses of global gene expression profiles from 43 primary tumours using orthogonal bioinformatic methods to define molecular subgroups of atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumours. Hierarchical clustering and non-negative matrix factorisation analyses of 200–1000 genes showed the strongest cophenetic coefficient at k=2 (appendix), indicating two broad classes of atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumours (groups 1 and 2), with suggestion of further heterogeneity within

Discussion

Our results show that atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumours are a biologically heterogeneous disease that comprise at least two molecular subtypes with distinct clinicopathological associations. Group 1 tumours were predominantly supratentorial, whereas group 2 were predominantly infratentorial. Furthermore, the tumours could be stratified into average, high, and very high risk categories by integration of tumour molecular subgrouping through ASCL1 immunostaining with clinical prognostic factors.

References (47)

  • W Zaky et al.

    Intensive induction chemotherapy followed by myeloablative chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell rescue for young children newly-diagnosed with central nervous system atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors: the Head Start III experience

    Pediatr Blood Cancer

    (2014)
  • TM Tekautz

    Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors (ATRT): improved survival in children 3 years of age and older with radiation therapy and high-dose alkylator-based chemotherapy

    J Clin Oncol

    (2005)
  • SN Chi et al.

    Intensive multimodality treatment for children with newly diagnosed CNS atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor

    J Clin Oncol

    (2008)
  • T Nicolaides et al.

    High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell rescue for atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor of the central nervous system

    J Neurooncol

    (2010)
  • I Slavc et al.

    Atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor: improved long-term survival with an intensive multimodal therapy and delayed radiotherapy. The Medical University of Vienna Experience 1992–2012

    Cancer Med

    (2014)
  • T Finkelstein-Shechter et al.

    Atypical teratoid or rhabdoid tumors: improved outcome with high-dose chemotherapy

    J Pediatr Hematol Oncol

    (2010)
  • I Versteege et al.

    Truncating mutations of hSNF5/INI1 in aggressive paediatric cancer

    Nature

    (1998)
  • JA Biegel et al.

    Alterations of the hSNF5/INI1 gene in central nervous system atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors and renal and extrarenal rhabdoid tumors

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2002)
  • F Bourdeaut et al.

    Frequent hSNF5/INI1 germline mutations in patients with rhabdoid tumor

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2011)
  • KW Eaton et al.

    Spectrum of SMARCB1/INI1 mutations in familial and sporadic rhabdoid tumors

    Pediatr Blood Cancer

    (2011)
  • A Klochendler-Yeivin et al.

    The murine SNF5/INI1 chromatin remodeling factor is essential for embryonic development and tumor suppression

    EMBO Rep

    (2000)
  • CW Roberts et al.

    Haploinsufficiency of Snf5 (integrase interactor 1) predisposes to malignant rhabdoid tumors in mice

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2000)
  • RS Lee et al.

    A remarkably simple genome underlies highly malignant pediatric rhabdoid cancers

    J Clin Invest

    (2012)
  • Cited by (129)

    • Pediatric CNS cancer genomics and immunogenomics

      2022, Current Opinion in Genetics and Development
      Citation Excerpt :

      These ideas were further supported by diagnostic and prognostic information being gleaned from conventional fluorescent in situ hybridization and DNA microarray studies that were used clinically to identify focal, regional, or chromosome arm-level copy number alterations in specific malignancies [35,40,47,49]; features that could be recapitulated by whole-genome sequencing (WGS) tumor/normal data. More recent meta-analyses of large numbers of genomic profiles from specific diagnoses have refined these observations to produce informative subtyping and identification of specific targets for therapeutic intervention [21,26,51,52]. Moreover, the results of these analyses emphasized the fundamental differences between adult and pediatric CNS malignancies and reinforced the importance of integrated molecular-profiling results to obtain a comprehensive evaluation of somatic drivers, germline susceptibility, actionable drug targets, and to provide diagnostic or prognostic information.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    *

    Co-contributing authors

    Co-senior authors

    View full text