Elsevier

Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews

Volume 65, Issue 10, 15 October 2013, Pages 1357-1369
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews

Fusion protein linkers: Property, design and functionality

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.039Get rights and content

Abstract

As an indispensable component of recombinant fusion proteins, linkers have shown increasing importance in the construction of stable, bioactive fusion proteins. This review covers the current knowledge of fusion protein linkers and summarizes examples for their design and application. The general properties of linkers derived from naturally-occurring multi-domain proteins can be considered as the foundation in linker design. Empirical linkers designed by researchers are generally classified into 3 categories according to their structures: flexible linkers, rigid linkers, and in vivo cleavable linkers. Besides the basic role in linking the functional domains together (as in flexible and rigid linkers) or releasing the free functional domain in vivo (as in in vivo cleavable linkers), linkers may offer many other advantages for the production of fusion proteins, such as improving biological activity, increasing expression yield, and achieving desirable pharmacokinetic profiles.

Introduction

As a product of recombinant DNA technology, fusion proteins have been developed as a class of novel biomolecules with multi-functional properties. By genetically fusing two or more protein domains together, the fusion protein product may obtain many distinct functions derived from each of their component moieties. Besides their wide applications in biological research such as protein purification [1] and imaging [2], recombinant fusion proteins have also become an important category of biopharmaceuticals (Fig. 1) [3], [4]. For example, many protein drugs are fused to Fc domains of antibodies, such as Fc-immunoglobulin G1 (Fc-IgG1), or to carrier proteins such as human serum albumin (HSA) or transferrin (Tf) to extend their plasma half-lives and to achieve enhanced therapeutic effects [5], [6], [7], [8]. They have also been widely applied for drug targeting, since proteins such as single chain antibodies or ligands for cell surface receptors can specifically target a linked functional protein (e.g. toxin or cytokine) to a specific type of cells [9], [10]. In drug delivery, the conjugation of protein drugs to carrier moieties such as cell penetrating peptides, antibodies or Tf can achieve efficient transport of the protein drugs across biological barriers such as cell membranes, the blood brain barrier or intestinal epithelium [11], [12], [13]. Several fusion proteins drugs including Enbrel® (tumor necrosis factor/Fc-IgG1), Ontak® (interleukin-2/diphtheria toxin), Orencia® (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4/Fc-IgG1), Amevive® (leukocyte function antigen-3/Fc-IgG1), Arcalyst® (interleukin-1 receptor extracellular domain/ Fc-IgG1), and Nplate® (thrombopoietin/Fc-IgG1) have been approved by the FDA [14], [15], [16]. With the rapid advancement of biotechnology, it is foreseeable that fusion protein technology will have increasing importance in creating novel protein therapeutics and in improving the performance of current protein drugs.

The successful construction of a recombinant fusion protein requires two indispensable elements: the component proteins and the linkers. The choice of the component proteins is based on the desired functions of the fusion protein product and, in most cases, is relatively straightforward. On the other hand, the selection of a suitable linker to join the protein domains together can be complicated and is often neglected in the design of fusion proteins. Direct fusion of functional domains without a linker may lead to many undesirable outcomes, including misfolding of the fusion proteins [17], low yield in protein production [18], or impaired bioactivity [19], [20]. Therefore, the selection or rational design of a linker to join fusion protein domains is an important, yet underexplored, area in recombinant fusion protein technology.

This review will summarize the current knowledge of linker design in recombinant fusion proteins. First, an overview of the properties of linkers in naturally-occurring multi-domain proteins will be provided as a general reference for linker design. Next, the empirical linkers that have been applied to the successful construction of recombinant fusion proteins will be discussed along with examples. Lastly, various functions that can be achieved by utilizing linkers in recombinant fusion proteins will be presented, including improving folding and stability, facilitating protein expression, increasing the intrinsic biological activities, enabling targeting toward specific sites in vivo, and altering the pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of fusion proteins.

Section snippets

General properties of linkers derived from naturally-occurring multi-domain proteins

Similar to recombinant fusion proteins, naturally-occurring multi-domain proteins are composed of two or more functional domains joined by linker peptides. These linker peptides serve to connect the protein moieties, and also provide many other functions, such as maintaining cooperative inter-domain interactions [21] or preserving biological activity [22]. Knowledge of natural linkers in multi-domain proteins is very helpful for the rational design of empirical linkers in recombinant fusion

Empirical linkers in recombinant fusion proteins

The studies of linkers in natural multi-domain proteins have generated many candidates for the general purpose of protein fusion [23], [25]. In addition, researchers have designed many empirical linkers with various sequences and conformations for the construction of recombinant fusion proteins. In the following section, three types of empirical linkers (flexible linkers, rigid linkers, and cleavable linkers) will be discussed to illustrate their versatile applications for fusion protein

Linker designing tools and databases

The extensive studies about linkers in natural multi-domain proteins and recombinant fusion proteins fostered the idea of building databases and coming up with linker designing tools to aid the rational design of linkers based on the desired characteristics of fusion proteins.

An example of this type of tool is a program called LINKER, which searches its database of linker sequences with user-specified inputs (e.g., linker length, protease sensitive sequences to be avoided), and generates an

Functionality of linkers in fusion proteins

The most basic function of linkers in recombinant fusion proteins is to covalently join the functional domains (e.g. flexible linkers or rigid linkers) or to release them under desired conditions (cleavable linkers). Linkers can also provide many derived functions in protein drug design such as improving biological activities, increasing production, achieving a controlled or targeted drug delivery, as well as achieving desirable PK profiles of the fusion proteins (Table 2, Table 3).

Summary and perspective

During the development of therapeutic recombinant fusion proteins, linker design has become a valuable means to achieve desired characteristics of the products. Linker sequences derived from natural multi-domain proteins may provide useful references for designing empirical linkers. Various empirical linkers such as flexible, rigid or cleavable linkers have been designed for various purposes, such as passively joining domains, spatially separating domains, or releasing free functional domains

References (85)

  • N. Amet et al.

    Human growth hormone-transferrin fusion protein for oral delivery in hypophysectomized rats

    J. Control. Release

    (2010)
  • R. Trinh et al.

    Optimization of codon pair use within the (GGGGS)3 linker sequence results in enhanced protein expression

    Mol. Immunol.

    (2004)
  • N. Takamatsu et al.

    Production of enkephalin in tobacco protoplasts using tobacco mosaic virus RNA vector

    FEBS Lett.

    (1990)
  • H. Zhao et al.

    Circumventing the heterogeneity and instability of human serum albumin-interferon-alpha2b fusion protein by altering its orientation

    J. Biotechnol.

    (2007)
  • S. Schulte

    Half-life extension through albumin fusion technologies

    Thromb. Res.

    (2009)
  • J. Martel-Pelletier et al.

    Metalloproteases and inhibitors in arthritic diseases

    Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol.

    (2001)
  • K. Lampert et al.

    Expression of matrix metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitors in human brain tumors

    Am. J. Pathol.

    (1998)
  • D. Leppert et al.

    Matrix metalloproteinases: multifunctional effectors of inflammation in multiple sclerosis and bacterial meningitis

    Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev.

    (2001)
  • N.M. Inocencio et al.

    Furin activates Pseudomonas exotoxin A by specific cleavage in vivo and in vitro

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1994)
  • D.E. Mager

    Target-mediated drug disposition and dynamics

    Biochem. Pharmacol.

    (2006)
  • U. Muller-Eberhard et al.

    Increase in surface expression of transferrin receptors on cultured hepatocytes of adult rats in response to iron deficiency

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1988)
  • P. Argos

    An investigation of oligopeptides linking domains in protein tertiary structures and possible candidates for general gene fusion

    J. Mol. Biol.

    (1990)
  • W. Hu et al.

    A flexible peptide linker enhances the immunoreactivity of two copies HBsAg preS1 (21–47) fusion protein

    J. Biotechnol.

    (2004)
  • K. Terpe

    Overview of tag protein fusions: from molecular and biochemical fundamentals to commercial systems

    Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.

    (2003)
  • R. Yuste

    Fluorescence microscopy today

    Nat. Methods

    (2005)
  • S.R. Schmidt

    Fusion-proteins as biopharmaceuticals—applications and challenges

    Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Devel.

    (2009)
  • X. Chen et al.

    Pharmacokinetics of recombinant bifunctional fusion proteins

    Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol.

    (2012)
  • B. Kim et al.

    Transferrin fusion technology: a novel approach to prolong biological half-life of insulinotropic peptides

    J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.

    (2010)
  • T. Weimer et al.

    Prolonged in-vivo half-life of factor VIIa by fusion to albumin

    Thromb. Haemost.

    (2008)
  • J.A. Dumont et al.

    Monomeric Fc fusions: impact on pharmacokinetic and biological activity of protein therapeutics

    BioDrugs

    (2006)
  • V. Schellenberger et al.

    A recombinant polypeptide extends the in vivo half-life of peptides and proteins in a tunable manner

    Nat. Biotechnol.

    (2009)
  • R.J. Kreitman

    Immunotoxins for targeted cancer therapy

    AAPS J.

    (2006)
  • G. Manoukian et al.

    Denileukin diftitox: a novel immunotoxin

    Expert Opin. Biol. Ther.

    (2009)
  • W.M. Pardridge

    Biopharmaceutical drug targeting to the brain

    J. Drug Target.

    (2010)
  • L.N. Patel et al.

    Cell penetrating peptides: intracellular pathways and pharmaceutical perspectives

    Pharm. Res.

    (2007)
  • B. Leader et al.

    Protein therapeutics: a summary and pharmacological classification

    Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.

    (2008)
  • M.F. McDermott

    Rilonacept in the treatment of chronic inflammatory disorders

    Drugs Today (Barc.)

    (2009)
  • G. Molineux

    The development of romiplostim for patients with immune thrombocytopenia

    Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.

    (2011)
  • N. Amet et al.

    Insertion of the designed helical linker led to increased expression of tf-based fusion proteins

    Pharm. Res.

    (2009)
  • Y. Bai et al.

    Recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-transferrin fusion protein as an oral myelopoietic agent

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2005)
  • Y. Bai et al.

    Improving the oral efficacy of recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and transferrin fusion protein by spacer optimization

    Pharm. Res.

    (2006)
  • R. George et al.

    An analysis of protein domain linkers: their classification and role in protein folding

    Protein Eng.

    (2002)
  • Cited by (1196)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This review is part of the Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews theme issue on “Editor's Choice 2013”.

    View full text