Elsevier

Human Pathology

Volume 42, Issue 7, July 2011, Pages 918-931
Human Pathology

Progress in pathology
Molecular pathogenesis and extraovarian origin of epithelial ovarian cancer—Shifting the paradigm

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2011.03.003Get rights and content

Summary

Recent morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic studies have led to the development of a new paradigm for the pathogenesis and origin of epithelial ovarian cancer based on a dualistic model of carcinogenesis that divides epithelial ovarian cancer into 2 broad categories designated types I and II. Type I tumors comprise low-grade serous, low-grade endometrioid, clear cell and mucinous carcinomas, and Brenner tumors. They are generally indolent, present in stage I (tumor confined to the ovary), and are characterized by specific mutations, including KRAS, BRAF, ERBB2, CTNNB1, PTEN, PIK3CA, ARID1A, and PPP2R1A, which target specific cell signaling pathways. Type I tumors rarely harbor TP53 mutations and are relatively stable genetically. Type II tumors comprise high-grade serous, high-grade endometrioid, malignant mixed mesodermal tumors (carcinosarcomas), and undifferentiated carcinomas. They are aggressive, present in advanced stage, and have a very high frequency of TP53 mutations but rarely harbor the mutations detected in type I tumors. In addition, type II tumors have molecular alterations that perturb expression of BRCA either by mutation of the gene or by promoter methylation. A hallmark of these tumors is that they are genetically highly unstable. Recent studies strongly suggest that fallopian tube epithelium (benign or malignant) that implants on the ovary is the source of low-grade and high-grade serous carcinoma rather than the ovarian surface epithelium as previously believed. Similarly, it is widely accepted that endometriosis is the precursor of endometrioid and clear cell carcinomas and, as endometriosis, is thought to develop from retrograde menstruation; these tumors can also be regarded as involving the ovary secondarily. The origin of mucinous and transitional cell (Brenner) tumors is still not well established, although recent data suggest a possible origin from transitional epithelial nests located in paraovarian locations at the tuboperitoneal junction. Thus, it now appears that type I and type II ovarian tumors develop independently along different molecular pathways and that both types develop outside the ovary and involve it secondarily. If this concept is confirmed, it leads to the conclusion that the only true primary ovarian neoplasms are gonadal stromal and germ cell tumors analogous to testicular tumors. This new paradigm of ovarian carcinogenesis has important clinical implications. By shifting the early events of ovarian carcinogenesis to the fallopian tube and endometrium instead of the ovary, prevention approaches, for example, salpingectomy with ovarian conservation, may play an important role in reducing the burden of ovarian cancer while preserving hormonal function and fertility.

Section snippets

Molecular pathogenesis of epithelial ovarian carcinoma

The introduction of the “borderline (low malignant potential)” category was an important step in refining the morphologic classification of EOC by identifying a group of tumors, defined as lacking destructive invasive growth that had a significantly better outcome than the invasive carcinomas. Because it was rare to find a borderline tumor coexisting with an invasive carcinoma, it was generally believed that they were unrelated. In 1996, a relationship between serous borderline tumor (SBT) and

Serous tumors

The conventional view of the origin of serous tumor has been that they were derived from the ovarian surface epithelium or cortical inclusion cysts. Therefore, there was surprise and skepticism when a group of Dutch investigators in 2001 first described tubal intraepithelial carcinomas, later designated “serous tubal intraepithelial carcinomas (STICs)” and occult invasive HGSCs in the fallopian tube that closely resembled ovarian HGSC, in women with a genetic predisposition to ovarian cancer

The new paradigm and its clinical implications

The aforementioned molecular genetic and morphologic studies have provided new insight into the pathogenesis and origin of EOC and, in so doing, have ushered in a new paradigm. These studies provide compelling evidence that contrary to what was previously believed, EOC is not primarily ovarian in origin but rather secondary leading to the conclusion that the only true primary ovarian neoplasms are gonadal stromal and germ cell tumors analogous to testicular tumors. This is not merely of

Conclusions

Recent morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic studies have led to the development of a new paradigm for the pathogenesis and origin of EOC. The paradigm is based on a dualistic model of carcinogenesis that divides EOC into 2 broad categories designated types I and II. Type I tumors are generally indolent, present in stage I (tumor confined to the ovary), and develop from borderline tumors and endometriosis. They are characterized by specific mutations, including KRAS, BRAF,

References (96)

  • A. Staebler et al.

    Micropapillary serous carcinoma of the ovary has distinct patterns of chromosomal imbalances by comparative genomic hybridization compared with atypical proliferative serous tumors and serous carcinomas

    Hum Pathol

    (2002)
  • L. Catasus et al.

    Molecular genetic alterations in endometrioid carcinomas of the ovary: similar frequency of beta-catenin abnormalities but lower rate of microsatellite instability and PTEN alterations than in uterine endometrioid carcinomas

    Hum Pathol

    (2004)
  • R. Wu et al.

    Mouse model of human ovarian endometrioid adenocarcinoma based on somatic defects in the Wnt/B-catenin and PI3K/Pten signaling pathways

    Cancer Cell

    (2007)
  • J. Willner et al.

    Alternate molecular genetic pathways in ovarian carcinomas of common histological types

    Hum Pathol

    (2007)
  • C. Gamallo et al.

    Beta-catenin expression pattern in stage I and II ovarian carcinomas: relationship with beta-catenin gene: mutations, clinicopathological features, and clinical outcome

    Am J Pathol

    (1999)
  • M.L. Gemignani et al.

    Role of KRAS and BRAF gene mutations in mucinous ovarian carcinoma

    Gynecol Oncol

    (2003)
  • J.M. Piek et al.

    Tubal ligation and risk of ovarian cancer

    Lancet

    (2001)
  • J.M. Piek et al.

    BRCA1/2-related ovarian cancers are of tubal origin: a hypothesis

    Gynecol Oncol

    (2003)
  • P.J. Paley et al.

    Occult cancer of the fallopian tube in BRCA-1 germline mutation carriers at prophylactic oophorectomy: a case for recommending hysterectomy at surgical prophylaxis

    Gynecol Oncol

    (2001)
  • A. Finch et al.

    Clinical and pathologic findings of prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomies in 159 BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers

    Gynecol Oncol

    (2006)
  • P.A. Shaw et al.

    Candidate serous cancer precursors in fallopian tube epithelium of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers

    Mod Pathol

    (2009)
  • V. Beral et al.

    Ovarian cancer and hormone replacement therapy in the Million Women Study

    Lancet

    (2007)
  • M.W. Audeh et al.

    Oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and recurrent ovarian cancer: a proof-of-concept trial

    Lancet

    (2010)
  • A. Tutt et al.

    Oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and advanced breast cancer: a proof-of-concept trial

    Lancet

    (2010)
  • T.S. Kuhn

    The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd ed., enlarged

    University of Chicago Press

    (1996)
  • S.H. Geist

    Ovarian tumors

    (1942)
  • R.T. Frank

    Gynecological and obstetrical pathology

    (1931)
  • B. Gemma

    Atlas of ovarian tumors

    (1943)
  • A.T. Hertig et al.

    Atlas of tumor pathology. Section ix–fascicle 3: tumors of the female sex organs. Part 3: tumors of the ovary and fallopian tube

    (1961)
  • S.F. Serov et al.

    International Histological Classification of Tumours no. 9. Histological typing of ovarian tunours

    (1973)
  • D.A. Bell et al.

    Early de novo ovarian carcinoma. A study of fourteen cases

    Cancer

    (1994)
  • L. Deligdisch

    Ovarian dysplasia: a review

    Int J Gynecol Cancer

    (1997)
  • L. Deligdisch et al.

    Ovarian dysplasia in prophylactic oophorectomy specimens: cytogenetic and morphometric correlations

    Cancer

    (1999)
  • H. Salazar et al.

    Microscopic benign and invasive malignant neoplasms and a cancer-prone phenotype in prophylactic oophorectomies

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (1996)
  • M.E. Sherman et al.

    Histopathologic features of ovaries at increased risk for carcinoma. A case-control analysis

    Int J Gynecol Pathol

    (1999)
  • J.F. Stratton et al.

    Comparison of prophylactic oophorectomy specimens from carriers and noncarriers of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation. United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research (UKCCCR) Familial Ovarian Cancer Study Group

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (1999)
  • D.H. Yang et al.

    Molecular events associated with dysplastic morphologic transformation and initiation of ovarian tumorigenicity

    Cancer

    (2002)
  • R.R. Barakat et al.

    Absence of premalignant histologic, molecular, or cell biologic alterations in prophylactic oophorectomy specimens from BRCA1 heterozygotes

    Cancer

    (2000)
  • G. Chene et al.

    Ovarian epithelial dysplasia and prophylactic oophorectomy for genetic risk

    Int J Gynecol Cancer

    (2009)
  • R.T. Burks et al.

    Micropapillary serous carcinoma of the ovary. A distinctive low-grade carcinoma related to serous borderline tumors

    Am J Surg Pathol

    (1996)
  • S. Jones et al.

    Frequent mutations of chromatin remodeling gene ARID1A in ovarian clear cell carcinoma

    Science

    (2010)
  • K.C. Wiegand et al.

    N Engl J Med

    (2010)
  • A.A. Ahmed et al.

    Driver mutations in TP53 are ubiquitous in high grade serous carcinoma of the ovary

    J Pathol

    (2010)
  • I. Meinhold-Heerlein et al.

    Molecular and prognostic distinction between serous ovarian carcinomas of varying grade and malignant potential

    Oncogene

    (2005)
  • T. Bonome et al.

    Expression profiling of serous low malignant potential, low-grade, and high-grade tumors of the ovary

    Cancer Res

    (2005)
  • R. Dehari et al.

    The development of high-grade serous carcinoma from atypical proliferative (borderline) serous tumors and low-grade micropapillary serous carcinoma: a morphologic and molecular genetic analysis

    Am J Surg Pathol

    (2007)
  • G. Singer et al.

    Mutations in BRAF and KRAS characterize the development of low-grade ovarian serous carcinoma

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (2003)
  • S.C. Mok et al.

    Mutation of K-ras protooncogene in human ovarian epithelial tumors of borderline malignancy

    Cancer Res

    (1993)
  • Cited by (889)

    • Counselling and management of women with genetic predisposition to gynaecological cancers

      2024, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This study is supported by a CDMRP grant (no. OC100517) from the US Department of Defense.

    View full text