Elsevier

Oral Oncology

Volume 49, Issue 1, January 2013, Pages 79-85
Oral Oncology

Natural course of distant metastases following radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.07.015Get rights and content

Summary

Objectives

To describe the natural course of distant metastases (DMs) following radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in HPV(+) oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC).

Methods

OPC treated with RT/CRT from 1/1/2000 to 5/31/2010 were reviewed. The natural course of DM were compared between HPV(+) and HPV(−) cohorts.

Results

Median follow-up was 3.9 years. The DM rate were similar (11% vs. 15% at 3-years, p = 0.25) between the HPV(+) (n = 457) vs. the HPV(−) (n = 167) cases. While almost all (24/25) HPV(−) DM occurred within 2-years following RT (1 was at 2.1 years), 7/54 (13%) of HPV(+) DM were detected beyond 3 years (up to 5.3 years). Disseminating to >2 organs occurred in 18 (33%) HPV(+) vs. none in HPV(−). Post-DM survival rates were 11% vs. 4% at 2-years (p = 0.02) for the HPV(+) vs. HPV(−) cases respectively. 5/6 HPV(+) with lung oligo-metastasis were still alive with stable disease beyond 2-years after salvage procedures for DM (chemotherapy: 3; surgical resection: 2; radiotherapy: 1).

Conclusions

Although DM rates are similar, the natural course of HPV(+) DM differs from that of HPV(−) patients: it may occur after a longer interval, often with a “disseminating” phenotype, and a small number may have prolonged survival after salvage for DM.

Introduction

At least two types of pharyngeal mucosal cancers are related to viral infection. Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) is associated with non-keratinizing subtypes of nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC).[1], [2] Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a confirmed cancer-causing agent for a subset of oropharyngeal cancer (OPC).3 Both cancers share unique similarities. They are more likely to exhibit non-keratinizing morphology,[4], [5] to have significant cervical lymphadenopathy at presentation,[6], [7] and to be more sensitive to radiotherapy (RT), compared to conventional (non-virally related) squamous cell carcinoma at the same respective anatomical location.[6], [8]

HPV infection is currently responsible for 40–80% of OPC in North America.9 HPV-related [HPV(+)] OPC exhibits fundamental differences compared to HPV-unrelated [HPV(−)] OPC, which is classically related to smoking and alcohol exposure. Despite more extensive regional lymph node involvement at presentation, HPV(+) OPC patients have superior loco-regional control and survival following RT or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) compared to their HPV(−) counterparts.[3], [8], [10], [11] However, some HPV(+) patients suffer from poor outcomes, mainly related to the development of distant metastases (DM). As is the case for NPC,12 DM seems to have become the dominant pattern of failure for OPC patients in the contemporary era.13

Although the reported DM rate is similar between HPV(+) and HPV(−) patients,[10], [14] some striking difference in their clinical behavior and prognosis have been observed. We previously reported preliminary data showing that HPV(+) OPC may exhibit a more “disseminating” phenotype (often involving multiple organs and unusual sites) once DM manifests15 but a low-event rate and insufficient follow-up hindered an analysis of the subsequent oncologic course. In the present report we expand the cohort and extend our evaluation to investigate the pattern of failure, time course following the development of DM, and the potential for long-term control after salvage procedures for HPV(+) DM in a larger sample size with more robust follow-up.

Section snippets

Patient population and clinical information

After institutional Research Ethics Board approval, a retrospective review was undertaken on all OPC patients treated with definitive RT or CRT from January 2000 to May 2010 at our institution. HPV status was ascertained by the surrogate marker, p16INK4A (p16) staining, as previously described.16 HPV status was evaluated retrospectively on all available tissue blocks for cases treated before 2009, and prospectively for cases treated from 2009 onwards when it became our routine clinical

Clinical characteristics: HPV(+) vs. HPV(−)

HPV status was available for 624 (61%) of 1029 consecutive OPC patients: 457 (73%) HPV(+) and 167 (27%) HPV(−). Clinical characteristics were compared between the HPV(+) vs. HPV(−) cohorts (Table 1). HPV(+) patients were younger, had less tobacco and alcohol exposure, and were more likely to receive concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Their tumors were almost exclusively of tonsil or tongue base origin, and had lower T- and higher N-category, compared to the HPV(−) patients.

Outcomes following radiotherapy ± chemotherapy

HPV(+) patients had higher

Discussion

In this study, we reaffirm the observation of a unique pattern of distant metastasis in a cohort of 457 HPV(+) compared to 167 HPV(−) OPC patients who received definitive RT or CRT between January, 2000 and May, 2010 in our institution. Despite superior loco-regional control and survival, the DM rate remains unchanged in the HPV(+) patients compared to HPV(−) patients. This is consistent with other reports.[10], [14], [23] Our study indicates that unlike HPV(−) cases, in whom loco-regional

Conclusions

This study has demonstrated a clinically distinct difference in the natural history of disease dissemination between HPV(+) and HPV(−) OPC patients. Distant metastasis is the predominant form of failure for HPV(+) OPC patients in our treated cohort. HPV(+) DM may manifest after a longer interval following RT. The DM pattern among HPV(+) patients seems to be heterogeneous: some may exhibit a “disseminating phenotype” combined with rapid progression when DM occurs; others seems to experience a

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the Bartley-Smith/Wharton, the Gordon Tozer, the Wharton Head and Neck Translational, Dr. Mariano Elia, and the Joe’s Team Funds at the Princess Margaret Hospital Foundation. We thank Marinela Labitan for support in tissue acquisition for p16 staining.

References (34)

  • M.T. Bortolin et al.

    Clinical value of Epstein–Barr virus DNA levels in peripheral blood samples of Italian patients with undifferentiated carcinoma of nasopharyngeal type

    Cancer Lett

    (2006)
  • H. Wolf et al.

    EB viral genomes in epithelial nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells

    Nat New Biol

    (1973)
  • M.L. Gillison et al.

    Evidence for a causal association between human papillomavirus and a subset of head and neck cancers

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (2000)
  • R.D. Chernock et al.

    HPV-related nonkeratinizing squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx: utility of microscopic features in predicting patient outcome

    Head Neck Pathol

    (2009)
  • G.R. Krueger et al.

    Histological types of nasopharyngeal carcinoma as compared to EBV serology

    Anticancer Res

    (1981)
  • B. Brennan

    Nasopharyngeal carcinoma

    Orphanet J Rare Dis

    (2006)
  • K. Lindel et al.

    Human papillomavirus positive squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx: a radiosensitive subgroup of head and neck carcinoma

    Cancer

    (2001)
  • Cited by (0)

    Presented in part at the European Society of Radiation Oncology (ESTRO) Anniversary Congress, London, United Kingdom, May 7–9, 2011.

    View full text