Elsevier

Vaccine

Volume 28, Issue 6, 10 February 2010, Pages 1468-1476
Vaccine

Multiple innate signaling pathways cooperate with CD40 to induce potent, CD70-dependent cellular immunity

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.11.071Get rights and content

Abstract

We have previously shown that Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists cooperate with CD40 to generate CD8 T cell responses exponentially larger than the responses generated with traditional vaccine formulations. We have also shown that combined TLR agonist/anti-CD40 immunization uniquely induces the upregulation of CD70 on antigen bearing dendritic cells (DCs). In contrast, immunization with either a TLR agonist or a CD40 stimulus alone does not significantly increase CD70 expression on DCs. Furthermore, the CD8+ T cell response generated by combined TLR agonist/anti-CD40 immunization is dependent on the expression of CD70 by DCs, as CD70 blockade following immunization dramatically decreases the CD8 T cell response. Here we show that other innate pathways, independent of the TLRs, can also cooperate with CD40 to induce potent, CD70 dependent, CD8 T cell responses. These innate stimuli include Type I IFN (IFN) and α-galactosylceramide (αGalCer) or aC-GalCer, glycolipids that are presented by a nonclassical class I MHC molecule, CD1d, and are able to activate NKT cells. Furthermore, this combined IFN/anti-CD40 immunization generates protective memory against bacterial challenge with Listeria monocytogenes. Together these data indicate the importance of assessing CD70 expression on DCs as a marker for the capacity of a given vaccine formulation to potently activate cellular immunity. Our data indicate that optimal induction of CD70 expression requires a coordinated stimulation of both innate (TLR, IFN, αGalCer) and adaptive (CD40) signaling pathways.

Introduction

Toll-like receptor (TLR) stimulation elicits a pro-inflammatory response involving the induction of the transcription factor NFκB and MAP kinases, leading to the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNFα, IL-12, IL-6, and IL-1 by dendritic cells (DCs) and macrophages [1], [2]. Triggering of TLRs 3, 4, 7, and 9 also leads to production of Type I Interferons (IFN), cytokines which have been shown to be important in the generation of adaptive immunity [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. Given the ability of TLRs to induce the production of these pro-inflammatory responses, TLR agonists are generally thought to be useful vaccine adjuvants [11]. Indeed, TLR agonists are relatively successful at augmenting humoral immune responses [12]. However, when used to enhance the generation of cellular immune responses, TLR agonists by themselves have largely been a disappointment [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]. Indeed, when used alone as a vaccine adjuvant, we previously showed that they are unable to generate cellular immune responses capable of protecting against viruses or other intracellular infections [23].

The paucity with which TLR agonists initiate cellular immunity reveals the fact that the precise quantity and/or quality of DC maturation that promotes the highest magnitude T cell response is still poorly understood. In general there is a prevailing view that “more is better”. Beyond that however, a precise characterization of how much of which costimulatory molecules are required for optimal T cell expansion is as of yet unknown, a somewhat surprising fact given the degree of effort that is put into investigating both DC and T cell activation. CD70 is a costimulatory marker expressed primarily by antigen presenting cells (APCs)[24]. It is a member of the TNF ligand superfamily and binds to its receptor CD27, which is expressed mainly on T cells but is also expressed on B cells and NK cells. CD70 has been shown to be important for the priming of CD8 T cell responses [23], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32] and blockade of CD70/CD27 interactions often dramatically reduces the generated CD8 T cell response [23], [25], [26], [28], [29], [30]. Importantly, CD70 has also been shown to be upregulated on APCs during some natural infections, and is known in this setting to be important for CD8 T cell priming [30]. Additionally, the constitutive expression of CD70 on immature DCs is enough to overcome tolerance and prime CD8+ T cells that can infiltrate into tumor sites and induce tumor regression [27]. Given the potency of CD70 for inducing cellular immunity, an established method for inducing its expression on DCs would be of great benefit for the purposes of vaccine development.

Toward this end, we previously demonstrated that immunization with both a TLR agonist and an agonistic anti-CD40 antibody induces a degree of CD8+ T cell expansion that is 10–50-fold greater than that observed in response to immunization in the presence of either agonist alone [14], [23]. The magnitude of these T cell responses often matches or even exceeds that seen in response to infectious agents such as LCMV or Listeria monocytogenes [18], [19], [20], [21]. When comparing the phenotype of dendritic cells stimulated with a TLR agonist, anti-CD40, or both, we observed that upregulation of the TNF ligand superfamily member CD70 on both CD8 and CD11b DC subsets was unique to only the combined TLR agonist/anti-CD40 stimulus [23]. The CD8 T cell response generated by the combined TLR agonist/anti-CD40 stimulus was dependent on this DC CD70 expression, since blocking CD70 from its receptor CD27, dramatically reduced the CD8 T cell response. Thus, CD70 expression in vivo is uniquely regulated by the combined stimulation of a TLR and CD40.

Here we show that the innate signaling pathways able to elicit the generation of potent CD70-dependent CD8 T cell responses in combination with CD40 are not limited to the TLRs. We demonstrate that Type I IFN (IFN) or NKT ligands (αGalCer or αC-GalCer) similarly induce the upregulation of CD70 on DCs when used in combination with anti-CD40, leading to the exponential expansion of antigen-specific T cells. While αGalCer alone can induce an increase in CD70 expression on DCs in vivo [29], maximal CD70 expression, leading to maximal CD8+ T cell expansion, is induced only when used in combination with anti-CD40 antibody. In contrast to αGalCer but similar to the TLR agonists [23], IFN alone induces no CD70 expression at all, but synergizes effectively with anti-CD40 to induce CD70 upregulation and the subsequent induction of CD8+ T cell memory that is protective against infectious challenge. Therefore, multiple innate pathways (TLRs, Type I IFN, NKT agonists) are able to work in synergy with CD40 to generate large CD8 T cell responses through a CD70-dependent mechanism, demonstrating the importance of CD70 as a marker in identifying vaccine strategies with efficacy in generating cellular immunity.

Section snippets

Type I IFN and α-GalCer can work synergistically with anti-CD40 to generate enhanced CD8 T cell responses

Combined Toll-like receptor (TLR) and CD40 stimulation along with specific antigen can induce a synergistic enhancement of the specific CD8 T cell response [14], [23]. A curious feature of the CD8+ T cell responses following this immunization is its variable dependence on IFN [14]. TLR agonists that induce IFN (for TLRs 3, 7, 9), generate a CD8+ T cell response that is highly IFN-dependent. In contrast, for TLR agonists that do not induce IFN (for TLRs 2, 1/2, 2/6), the ensuing CD8+ T cell

Discussion

Many years ago, Charlie Janeway first referred to an adjuvant as the Immunologist's “dirty little secret” [40]. Paraphrased, this “secret” was the fact that the generation of an effective immune response to a foreign antigen required the concomitant inoculation of an inflammatory component, i.e. the use of an adjuvant. In the absence of this adjuvant, one was more likely to produce tolerance to the antigen of interest rather than immunity [41]. As a result, much effort has concentrated on what

Mice and injections

C57BL/6 mice purchased from NCI, or MyD88−/−, IFNαR−/−, and Ja18−/− mice bred in house [34], were immunized with 0.1–0.2 mg of ovalbumin as previously described [14]. Whole protein was injected (i.v.) in combination with either recombinant IFNα (isolated in house), 2 μg αC-galactosylceramide (provided by the NIH), 2 μg α-galactosylceramide (purchased from Alexis Biochemicals, cat #306-027-M001), the anti-CD40 antibody FGK45 (50 μg), or their combinations. Ovalbumin was purchased from Sigma

References (60)

  • O. Adam et al.

    A nondegradative route for the removal of endotoxin from exopolysaccharides

    Anal Biochem

    (1995)
  • O. Shimozato et al.

    Expression of CD30 ligand (CD153) on murine activated T cells

    Biochem Biophys Res Commun

    (1999)
  • A.D. Edwards et al.

    Toll-like receptor expression in murine DC subsets: lack of TLR7 expression by CD8alpha+ DC correlates with unresponsiveness to imidazoquinolines

    Eur J Immunol

    (2003)
  • A.D. Edwards et al.

    Microbial recognition via Toll-like receptor-dependent and -independent pathways determines the cytokine response of murine dendritic cell subsets to CD40 triggering

    J Immunol

    (2002)
  • J. Zhu et al.

    Type I IFN signaling on both B and CD4 T cells is required for protective antibody response to adenovirus

    J Immunol

    (2007)
  • S. Hervas-Stubbs et al.

    Insect baculoviruses strongly potentiate adaptive immune responses by inducing Type I IFN

    J Immunol

    (2007)
  • K. Fink et al.

    Early Type I interferon-mediated signals on B cells specifically enhance antiviral humoral responses

    Eur J Immunol

    (2006)
  • A. Le Bon et al.

    Direct stimulation of T cells by Type I IFN enhances the CD8+ T cell response during cross-priming

    J Immunol

    (2006)
  • J.M. Curtsinger et al.

    Type I IFNs provide a third signal to CD8 T cells to stimulate clonal expansion and differentiation

    J Immunol

    (2005)
  • C. Havenar-Daughton et al.

    Cutting edge: the direct action of Type I IFN on CD4 T cells is critical for sustaining clonal expansion in response to a viral but not a bacterial infection

    J Immunol

    (2006)
  • G.A. Kolumam et al.

    Type I interferons act directly on CD8 T cells to allow clonal expansion and memory formation in response to viral infection

    J Exp Med

    (2005)
  • L.J. Thompson et al.

    Innate inflammatory signals induced by various pathogens differentially dictate the IFN-I dependence of CD8 T cells for clonal expansion and memory formation

    J Immunol

    (2006)
  • B. Pulendran

    Modulating vaccine responses with dendritic cells and Toll-like receptors

    Immunol Rev

    (2004)
  • V. Durand et al.

    Shaping of adaptive immune responses to soluble proteins by TLR agonists: a role for IFN-alpha/beta

    Immunol Cell Biol

    (2004)
  • M. Tritel et al.

    Prime-boost vaccination with HIV-1 Gag protein and cytosine phosphate guanosine oligodeoxynucleotide, followed by adenovirus, induces sustained and robust humoral and cellular immune responses

    J Immunol

    (2003)
  • C.L. Ahonen et al.

    Combined TLR and CD40 triggering induces potent CD8+ T cell expansion with variable dependence on Type I IFN

    J Exp Med

    (2004)
  • E.G. Rhee et al.

    Vaccination with heat-killed Leishmania antigen or recombinant leishmanial protein and CpG oligodeoxynucleotides induces long-term memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses and protection against Leishmania major infection

    J Exp Med

    (2002)
  • U. Wille-Reece et al.

    Immunization with HIV-1 Gag protein conjugated to a TLR7/8 agonist results in the generation of HIV-1 Gag-specific Th1 and CD8+ T cell responses

    J Immunol

    (2005)
  • D.H. Busch et al.

    T cell affinity maturation by selective expansion during infection

    J Exp Med

    (1999)
  • E. Butz et al.

    Dynamics of the CD8+ T cell response during acute LCMV infection

    Adv Exp Med Biol

    (1998)
  • Cited by (30)

    • Co-administration of α-GalCer analog and TLR4 agonist induces robust CD8<sup>+</sup> T-cell responses to PyCS protein and WT-1 antigen and activates memory-like effector NKT cells

      2016, Clinical Immunology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, combining two potent immune activators, such as CD1d ligands and TLR ligands, may be an interesting strategy for improving the adjuvant effect of iNKT-cell activation, as illustrated in Supplemental Fig. 1. In fact, the combined effect of iNKT-cell activators and TLR agonists has previously been demonstrated and employed on the immunotherapy of infectious diseases [19–21]. Our group has recently identified a α-GalCer analog, called 7DW8-5, which has a higher binding affinity to CD1d than α-GalCer and potently activates iNKT cells.

    • T Cell Vaccinology: Beyond the Reflection of Infectious Responses

      2016, Trends in Immunology
      Citation Excerpt :

      By contrast, IL-27 signaling appears to be required for the T cell responses to a host of subunit adjuvants [2], while the response to infectious challenge is either unaffected or even elevated in the absence of this cytokine [3,4]. Members of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor superfamily expressed by T cells largely enhance various qualitative aspects of the T cell responses during infection [5–8], but instead dictate the quantitative magnitude of the response in subunit vaccine settings [9–15]. In short, the success or failure to produce a cellular response by subunit vaccination may be guided by different underlying mechanisms than those that govern infectious challenge.

    • An alternative signal 3: CD8 <sup>+</sup> T cell memory independent of IL-12 and type I IFN is dependent on CD27/OX40 signaling

      2012, Vaccine
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition to the role of cytokines in this process, members of the TNFR/TNFL superfamily have also been shown to be important contributors to the development of CD8+ T cell immunity. Both the use of TNF ligand blocking antibodies and TNF receptor deficient mice have shown individual and cooperative roles for CD27, OX40, and 4-1BB in promoting the generation of CD8+ T cell immunity [5–15]. Generally speaking, the stimulation of a CD8+ T cell via one or more of these TNF receptors enhances T cell proliferation, survival, and differentiation to effector function [16,17].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text