Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Resource
  • Published:

Multimodal mapping of the tumor and peripheral blood immune landscape in human pancreatic cancer

Nature Cancer volume 1, pages 1097–1112 (2020)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is characterized by an immune-suppressive tumor microenvironment that renders it largely refractory to immunotherapy. We implemented a multimodal analysis approach to elucidate the immune landscape in PDA. Using a combination of CyTOF, single-cell RNA sequencing and multiplex immunohistochemistry on patient tumors, matched blood and non-malignant samples, we uncovered a complex network of immune-suppressive cellular interactions. These experiments revealed heterogeneous expression of immune checkpoint receptors in individual patients’ T cells and increased markers of CD8+ T cell dysfunction in the advanced disease stage. Tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells had an increased proportion of cells expressing an exhausted expression profile that included upregulation of the immune checkpoint TIGIT, a finding that we validated at the protein level. Our findings point to a profound alteration of the immune landscape of tumors, and to patient-specific immune changes that should be taken into account as combination immunotherapy becomes available for pancreatic cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: CyTOF and mfIHC mapping reveals heterogeneous immune infiltration in human pancreatic cancer.
Fig. 2: scRNA-seq reveals heterogeneous expression of immune checkpoints in PDA tissue.
Fig. 3: scRNA-seq reveals that the CD8+ Tex cell phenotype in patients with PDA is defined by the immune checkpoint TIGIT.
Fig. 4: scRNA-seq of pancreatic tissues reveals that TIGIT is differentially expressed in NK cells from patients with PDA and is a defining marker of Treg cells.
Fig. 5: scRNA-seq reveals distinct myeloid and dendritic cell subsets.
Fig. 6: Predicted ligand–receptor mapping in patients with PDA demonstrates myeloid and non-immune cell types as sources of immune checkpoint ligands.
Fig. 7: CyTOF and immunofluorescence protein validation of immune checkpoint expression in human pancreatic tissues and PBMCs.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All raw data are publicly available without restrictions. All mass cytometry data used for this publication have been deposited in the FlowRepository. All FCS files of tissue (tumor and adjacent/normal) have been uploaded to FlowRepository Experiment FR-FCM-Z2S4 and PBMC files have been uploaded to FlowRepository Experiment FR-FCM-Z2S3 (https://flowrepository.org/id/FR-FCM-Z2S4, https://flowrepository.org/id/FR-FCM-Z2S3). The corresponding file key for the FCS files is in Supplementary Table 6 and refers to Figs. 1 and 7 and Extended Data Figs. 6 and 7. scRNA-seq data with clinical metadata are available from the NIH database of Genotypes and Phenotypes under the accession number phs002071.v1.p1. Deidentified scRNA-seq data are available from the NIH Gene Expression Omnibus database under the accession number GSE155698. All other data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

Code is publicly available from GitHub (https://github.com/PascaDiMagliano-Lab/MultimodalMappingPDA-scRNASeq).

References

  1. Royal, R. E. et al. Phase 2 trial of single agent ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) for locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J. Immunother. 33, 828–833 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Brahmer, J. R. et al. Safety and activity of anti-PD-L1 antibody in patients with advanced cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 366, 2455–2465 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Stromnes, I. M. et al. T-cell localization, activation, and clonal expansion in human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Immunol. Res. 5, 978–991 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Balli, D. et al. Immune cytolytic activity stratifies molecular subsets of human pancreatic cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 23, 3129–3138 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Carstens, J. L. et al. Spatial computation of intratumoral T cells correlates with survival of patients with pancreatic cancer. Nat. Commun. 8, 15095 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Balachandran, V. P. et al. Identification of unique neoantigen qualities in long-term survivors of pancreatic cancer. Nature 551, 512–516 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Tsujikawa, T. et al. Quantitative multiplex immunohistochemistry reveals myeloid-inflamed tumor-immune complexity associated with poor prognosis. Cell Rep. 19, 203–217 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Vonderheide, R. H. The immune revolution: a case for priming, not checkpoint. Cancer Cell 33, 563–569 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Clark, C. E. et al. Dynamics of the immune reaction to pancreatic cancer from inception to invasion. Cancer Res. 67, 9518–9527 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moncada, R, et al. Integrating microarray-based spatial transcriptomics and single-cell RNA-seq reveals tissue architecture in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. Nat Biotechnol. 38, 333–342 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chan-Seng-Yue, M. et al. Transcription phenotypes of pancreatic cancer are driven by genomic events during tumor evolution. Nat. Genet. 52, 231–240 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Elyada, E. et al. Cross-species single-cell analysis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma reveals antigen-presenting cancer-associated fibroblasts. Cancer Discov. 9, 1102–1123 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Dominguez, C. X. et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals stromal evolution into LRRC15+ myofibroblasts as a determinant of patient response to cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Discov. 10, 232–253 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Manieri, N. A., Chiang, E. Y. & Grogan, J. L. TIGIT: a key inhibitor of the cancer immunity cycle. Trends Immunol. 38, 20–28 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cohen, M. et al. Lung single-cell signaling interaction map reveals basophil role in macrophage imprinting. Cell 175, 1031–1044.e18 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, Q. et al. Landscape and dynamics of single immune cells in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell 179, 829–845.e20 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bendall, S. C. et al. Single-cell mass cytometry of differential immune and drug responses across a human hematopoietic continuum. Science 332, 687–696 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Nowicka, M. et al. CyTOF workflow: differential discovery in high-throughput high-dimensional cytometry datasets. F1000Res 6, 748 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Amir, E. D. et al. Development of a comprehensive antibody staining database using a standardized analytics pipeline. Front. Immunol. 10, 1315 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang, Y. et al. Myeloid cells are required for PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint activation and the establishment of an immunosuppressive environment in pancreatic cancer. Gut 66, 124–136 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Panni, R. Z. et al. Agonism of CD11b reprograms innate immunity to sensitize pancreatic cancer to immunotherapies. Sci. Transl. Med. 11, eaau9240 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Stromnes, I. M. et al. Targeted depletion of an MDSC subset unmasks pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma to adaptive immunity. Gut 63, 1769–1781 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lazarus, J. et al. Spatial and phenotypic immune profiling of metastatic colon cancer. JCI Insight 3, e121932 (2018).

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Beatty, G. L. et al. Exclusion of T cells from pancreatic carcinomas in mice is regulated by Ly6ClowF4/80+ extratumoral macrophages. Gastroenterology 149, 201–210 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sanford, D. E. et al. Inflammatory monocyte mobilization decreases patient survival in pancreatic cancer: a role for targeting the CCL2/CCR2 axis. Clin. Cancer Res. 19, 3404–3415 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. DeNardo, D. G. & Ruffell, B. Macrophages as regulators of tumour immunity and immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 19, 369–382 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Nywening, T. M. et al. Targeting both tumour-associated CXCR2+ neutrophils and CCR2+ macrophages disrupts myeloid recruitment and improves chemotherapeutic responses in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Gut 67, 1112–1123 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhu, Y. et al. Tissue-resident macrophages in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma originate from embryonic hematopoiesis and promote tumor progression. Immunity 47, 323–338.e6 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhu, Y. et al. CSF1/CSF1R blockade reprograms tumor-infiltrating macrophages and improves response to T-cell checkpoint immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer models. Cancer Res. 74, 5057–5069 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Rosenberg, S. A. Decade in review-cancer immunotherapy: entering the mainstream of cancer treatment. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 11, 630–632 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Carlson, C. M. et al. Kruppel-like factor 2 regulates thymocyte and T-cell migration. Nature 442, 299–302 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wherry, E. J. et al. Molecular signature of CD8+ T cell exhaustion during chronic viral infection. Immunity 27, 670–684 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Li, J. et al. High levels of eomes promote exhaustion of anti-tumor CD8+ T cells. Front. Immunol. 9, 2981 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Jansen, C. S. et al. An intra-tumoral niche maintains and differentiates stem-like CD8 T cells. Nature 576, 465–470 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Kondo, T., Takata, H. & Takiguchi, M. Functional expression of chemokine receptor CCR6 on human effector memory CD8+ T cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 37, 54–65 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ducimetiere, L., Vermeer, M. & Tugues, S. The interplay between innate lymphoid cells and the tumor microenvironment. Front. Immunol. 10, 2895 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Arlettaz, L. et al. Expression of inhibitory KIR is confined to CD8+ effector T cells and limits their proliferative capacity. Eur. J. Immunol. 34, 3413–3422 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. McMahon, C. W. et al. Viral and bacterial infections induce expression of multiple NK cell receptors in responding CD8+ T cells. J. Immunol. 169, 1444–1452 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Smith, S. L. et al. Diversity of peripheral blood human NK cells identified by single-cell RNA sequencing. Blood Adv. 4, 1388–1406 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang, Y. et al. CD4+ T lymphocyte ablation prevents pancreatic carcinogenesis in mice. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2, 423–435 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang, Y. et al. Regulatory T-cell depletion alters the tumor microenvironment and accelerates pancreatic carcinogenesis. Cancer Discov. 10, 422–439 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Jang, J. E. et al. Crosstalk between regulatory T cells and tumor-associated dendritic cells negates anti-tumor immunity in pancreatic cancer. Cell Rep. 20, 558–571 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Sckisel, G. D. et al. Differential phenotypes of memory CD4 and CD8 T cells in the spleen and peripheral tissues following immunostimulatory therapy. J. Immunother. Cancer 5, 33 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Bengsch, F. et al. CTLA-4/CD80 pathway regulates T cell infiltration into pancreatic cancer. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 66, 1609–1617 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Hegde, S. et al. Dendritic cell paucity leads to dysfunctional immune surveillance in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Cell 37, 289–307.e9 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Huber, S. et al. IL-22BP is regulated by the inflammasome and modulates tumorigenesis in the intestine. Nature 491, 259–263 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Lanfranca, M. P. et al. Interleukin 22 signaling regulates acinar cell plasticity to promote pancreatic tumor development in mice. Gastroenterology 158, 1417–1432.e11 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Collin, M. & Bigley, V. Human dendritic cell subsets: an update. Immunology 154, 3–20 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Veglia, F. & Gabrilovich, D. I. Dendritic cells in cancer: the role revisited. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 45, 43–51 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Ramilowski, J. A. et al. A draft network of ligand–receptor-mediated multicellular signalling in human. Nat. Commun. 6, 7866 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Das, S. et al. Tumor cell-derived IL-1β promotes desmoplasia and immune suppression in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res. 80, 1088–1101 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Ohlund, D. et al. Distinct populations of inflammatory fibroblasts and myofibroblasts in pancreatic cancer. J. Exp. Med. 214, 579–596 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Fourcade, J. et al. CD226 opposes TIGIT to disrupt Tregs in melanoma. JCI Insight 3, e121157 (2018).

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Yu, X. et al. The surface protein TIGIT suppresses T cell activation by promoting the generation of mature immunoregulatory dendritic cells. Nat. Immunol. 10, 48–57 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Maj, T. et al. Oxidative stress controls regulatory T cell apoptosis and suppressor activity and PD-L1-blockade resistance in tumor. Nat. Immunol. 18, 1332–1341 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Ligorio, M. et al. Stromal microenvironment shapes the intratumoral architecture of pancreatic cancer. Cell 178, 160–175.e27 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Stuart, T. & Satija, R. Integrative single-cell analysis. Nat. Rev. Genet. 20, 257–272 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Xu, J. et al. Peripheral blood T-cell fitness is diminished in patients with pancreatic carcinoma but can be improved with homeostatic cytokines. Cell Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 8, 656–658.e6 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Zhang, Q. et al. Blockade of the checkpoint receptor TIGIT prevents NK cell exhaustion and elicits potent anti-tumor immunity. Nat. Immunol. 19, 723–732 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Solomon, B. L. & Garrido-Laguna, I. TIGIT: a novel immunotherapy target moving from bench to bedside. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 67, 1659–1667 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Van Gassen, S. et al. FlowSOM: using self-organizing maps for visualization and interpretation of cytometry data. Cytometry A 87a, 636–645 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. McCarthy, D. J., Chen, Y. & Smyth, G. K. Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-Seq experiments with respect to biological variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 4288–4297 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. RStudio Team RStudio: Integrated Development for R (RStudio, 2015); http://www.rstudio.com/

  65. R Core Development Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2017); https://www.R-project.org/

  66. Krzywinski, M. et al. Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 19, 1639–1645 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Cochran and T. Wightman at the Flow Cytometry Core at the University of Rochester Medical Center and A. M. Gunawan at the Indiana University Simon Cancer Center Flow Cytometry for support with cell CyTOF acquisition. We thank V. Motta and K. Brown from Fluidigm for assistance with panel design. We thank P. Schnepp and A. Ahmed for assistance with CyTOF experimental design. We thank T. Tamsen and J. Opp from the University of Michigan Advanced Genomics Core. We thank D. Hill and M. Czerwinski for input on designing single-cell analysis pipelines. We thank A. Gilado and I. Amit for expertise in building our pancreatic interactome network. We thank the Tissue Procurement Center at the University of Michigan. We thank E. Stack (formerly with PerkinElmer) for assistance with initial R introduction and basic training using inForm 2.3.0 and earlier versions and staining strategies. We thank P. Turncliff for excellent graphics. We thank J. Spence for the VE-cadherin antibody gift. This project was supported by NIH/NCI grants R01CA151588, R01CA198074 and the American Cancer Society (to M.P.d.M.). This work was also supported by a University of Michigan Cancer Center Support Grant (P30CA046592), including an administrative supplement and by NIH/NCI grant U01CA224145 H.C.C. and M.P.d.M. F.B. was funded by the Association for Academic Surgery Joel J. Roslyn Award. T.L.F. was funded by K08CA201581. S.B.K. was supported by T32-GM113900. N.G.S., V.R.S. and K.D. were supported by T32-CA009676. E.S.C. is supported by the American College of Gastroenterology Clinical Research Award and by T32-DK094775. N.G.S. is a recipient of the American Cancer Society Postdoctoral Award PF-19-096-01 and the Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MICHR) Postdoctoral Translational Scholars Program fellowship award. A.R. and S.T. were supported by institutional startup funds from the University of Michigan, a gift from Agilent Technologies, NCI grant R37CA214955 and a Research Scholar Grant from the American Cancer Society (RSG-16-005−01). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Nina G. Steele, Eileen S. Carpenter, Samantha B. Kemp, Veerin R. Sirihorachai.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Nina G. Steele, Benjamin L. Allen & Marina Pasca di Magliano

  2. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Eileen S. Carpenter, Erik-Jan Wamsteker, Richard Kwon, Allison Schulman, Anoop Prabhu, Ryan Law, Arjun Sondhi, Jessica Yu, Arpan Patel & Michelle A. Anderson

  3. Molecular and Cellular Pathology Graduate Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Samantha B. Kemp, Costas A. Lyssiotis, Howard C. Crawford & Marina Pasca di Magliano

  4. Cancer Biology Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Veerin R. Sirihorachai, Katelyn Donahue, Costas A. Lyssiotis, Arvind Rao, Howard C. Crawford & Marina Pasca di Magliano

  5. Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Stephanie The, Angel Ka Yan Chu & Arvind Rao

  6. Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Lawrence Delrosario, Jenny Lazarus, Carlos Espinoza, Samantha Bell, Fatima Lima, Valerie Irizarry-Negron, Justin Macchia, Heather Schofield, Hari Nathan, Clifford Cho, Weiping Zou, Filip Bednar, Timothy L. Frankel & Marina Pasca di Magliano

  7. Astrolabe Diagnostics, Fort Lee, NJ, USA

    El-ad David Amir

  8. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Valerie Gunchick & Vaibhav Sahai

  9. Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Lindsey Harris, Daniel Paglia, Costas A. Lyssiotis & Howard C. Crawford

  10. Michigan Institute of Data Science (MIDAS), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Arvind Rao

  11. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Arvind Rao

Authors
  1. Nina G. Steele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eileen S. Carpenter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Samantha B. Kemp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Veerin R. Sirihorachai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Stephanie The
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lawrence Delrosario
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jenny Lazarus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. El-ad David Amir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Valerie Gunchick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Carlos Espinoza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Samantha Bell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Lindsey Harris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Fatima Lima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Valerie Irizarry-Negron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Daniel Paglia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Justin Macchia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Angel Ka Yan Chu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Heather Schofield
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Erik-Jan Wamsteker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Richard Kwon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Allison Schulman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Anoop Prabhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  23. Ryan Law
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  24. Arjun Sondhi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  25. Jessica Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  26. Arpan Patel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  27. Katelyn Donahue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  28. Hari Nathan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  29. Clifford Cho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  30. Michelle A. Anderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  31. Vaibhav Sahai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  32. Costas A. Lyssiotis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  33. Weiping Zou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  34. Benjamin L. Allen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  35. Arvind Rao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  36. Howard C. Crawford
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  37. Filip Bednar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  38. Timothy L. Frankel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  39. Marina Pasca di Magliano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.P.d.M. directed the study. T.L.F., F.B. and H.C.C. assisted with study design and analysis. M.P.d.M., N.G.S., E.S.C. and S.B.K. developed the study concept and were responsible for the study design. J.L., L.D., V.I.-N. and S.B. stained and analyzed the mfIHC. T.L.F. coordinated the mfIHC. V.G., E.S.C., E.-J.W., R.K., A. Schulman., A. Sondhi, A.P., R.L., J.Y., A.P., H.N., C.C., M.A.A. and H.S. procured human tissue and assisted with clinical data collection. V.G. and E.S.C. maintained the database of human biospecimens. N.G.S., E.S.C., S.B.K., D.P., J.M., C.E. and F.L. processed the samples for CyTOF. E.S.C., V.R.S., J.M., C.E., D.P. and L.H. processed samples for scRNA-seq. F.B. developed an R pipeline for CyTOF analysis. E.D.A. analyzed the CyTOF PBMC data. A.R., S.T. and A.K.Y.C. developed the bioinformatics analysis pipelines and carried out the interactome analysis. V.R.S., N.G.S., S.B.K. and K.D. analyzed the scRNA-seq data. N.G.S., S.B.K. and E.S.C. analyzed the CyTOF data. V.S., C.A.L., B.L.A., A.R., H.S., W.Z., H.C.C., F.B., T.L.F., C.C., K.D. and E.D.A. provided study guidance and feedback on the manuscript. N.G.S., E.S.C., S.B.K. and M.P.d.M. wrote the manuscript, which was then edited by all of the co-authors. All of the co-authors approved the final version of the manuscript before submission.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Howard C. Crawford, Filip Bednar, Timothy L. Frankel or Marina Pasca di Magliano.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 CyTOF and multiplex fluorescent immunohistochemistry (mfIHC) mapping can be readily performed on patient tumor samples and show a heterogeneous immune infiltration in human pancreatic cancer.

a, Patient breakdown and tumor characteristics of CyTOF performed on 8 adj/norm pancreas and 10 PDA tumor samples (surgical (7) vs. fine needle biopsy (FNB) (3)). b, Representative H&E stains of samples DS20191258 (Adj/Norm), DS20191299 (PDA tumor from surgical resection), and DS20191324 (PDA tumor from fine needle biopsy). c, The ConsensusClusterPlus and FlowSOM R packages were used to define the initial 22 clusters identified in the tissue CyTOF samples. d, Final heatmap demonstrating marker expression used to define cell populations. e, Manual gating of CD3-CD8A-CD45+CD56+ NK cells in adjacent/normal and PDA tissue samples, n=5 adjacent/normal tissue samples and n=4 PDA tissue samples. Two-sided Student’s t-test was performed to compare between groups and asterisk indicates a p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. For manual gating of NK cells n=5 for adj/norm and n=4 for PDA patient samples. f, mfIHC composite image of PDA (left). Phenotype map with the following basic phenotypes at their x and y coordinates: T cell (green), epithelial cells (pink), APCs (orange), other cells (grey) (right). 71 individual PDA and 34 individual chronic pancreatitis subjects were examined in this analysis. g, Relative cellular composition by quantitation of mfIHC of representative surgical PDA tissue of additional patients DS20181166 (PDA tumor from distal pancreatectomy), DS20181141 (PDA tumor from distal pancreatectomy). h, Corresponding mfIHC images of DS20181166, and DS20181141.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 Single Cell RNA Sequencing of PDA tissue reveals heterogeneous cellular composition and expression of immune checkpoints.

a, Single cell RNA sequencing tissue sample breakdown (n = 3 Adj/Norm tissue, n=10 PDA tissue from fine needle biopsy, and n=6 PDA tissue from surgical resection), patient clinical data, and tumor characteristics (grade and stage) (Left panel). Breakdown of sequenced PBMC samples with corresponding patient clinical data (Right panel). b, UMAP of the merged tissue colored by Patient ID prior to batch correction (Left panel) and post batch correction (Right panel). c, UMAP of 3 individual adjacent/normal samples and d, 16 PDA tissues. We distinguished two epithelial populations: tumor cells and acinar cells. In the non-epithelial compartment, we identified fibroblasts, pericytes, CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, Tregs, NK cells, B cells, plasma cells, mast cells, macrophages, granulocytes, dendritic cells, endothelial cells, and a small endocrine population.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Single Cell RNA Sequencing of PDA PBMCs reveals heterogeneous cellular composition and expression of immune checkpoints.

a, Merged UMAP plots of PBMCs from 4 healthy donors and 16 PDA patients (total of 70,113 cells). CD8 T cells (green), CD4 T cells (light green), NK cells (purple), pDCs (blue), Granulocyte (light orange), Monocyte (orange), B cells (yellow), Plasma cells (light yellow). b, Dot plot analysis of key markers to define the 8 identified cell populations. Color of dot represents average expression, while the size of the dot represents percent expression. Dot plot represents merged healthy (n=4) and PDA (n=16) patient gene expression of PBMC lineage markers. c, Average expression of immune checkpoint ligands and receptors in the identified cell populations in merged blood samples. d, Average expression of immune checkpoint receptors on CD8+ T cells in merged PBMCs. e, Average expression of differentially expressed genes in CD8+ T cells comparing healthy (black) to PDA (grey) PBMCs. Disease stage is plotted on the left.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Single cell RNA sequencing reveals 3 CD8+ T cell populations: effector, exhausted, and memory CD8+ T Cells.

a, Feature plots of immune checkpoints (PDCD1, LAG3, TIGIT, HAVCR2), activation markers (IFNG, GZMB), and exhaustion markers (GZMK, EOMES) in CD8+ T cells. b, Number of effector (pink), exhausted (green), and memory (blue) CD8+ T cells captured in each individual tissue sample by scRNA seq. c, Average scaled expression heatmap of highly enriched genes by potential effector, exhausted, and memory cell populations. (n = 3 Adj/Norm tissue and n= 16 PDA tissue for panels a–c).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 5 Single cell RNA sequencing of myeloid subsets in human pancreatic cancer.

a, Violin Plots illustrating comparison of immune checkpoint ligands in myeloid clusters in PDA vs. adjacent normal/pancreas samples. b, Average expression heatmap of checkpoint ligands in merged macrophages (all cells expressing CD68 within the myeloid population) and c, merged granulocytes (all cells expressing FCGR3B within the myeloid population). Left panels denote disease state (adjacent/normal vs. PDA tissue) and stage. d, Map of all putative ligand receptor differential interactions that are upregulated in 16 PDA compared to 3 adjacent/normal pancreas. The line color denotes cellular source of the ligand, and putative interactions were visualized in Cytoscape® V3.7.1. e, Dot plot analysis showing expression of adenosine receptors in PDA tumor cell types. Red indicates high expression, blue low expression, and the size of the dot is relative to the percent that marker is expressed. Dot plot represent n=16 PDA patient gene expression of adenosine receptors.

Extended Data Fig. 6 CyTOF analysis of PBMCs from healthy, chronic pancreatitis, and PDA patients.

a, Patient breakdown and characteristics of CyTOF performed on patient blood samples (n = 16 healthy patients, n = 10 chronic pancreatitis patients, and n=36 PDA patients). b, t-SNE analysis of CyTOF of all merged PBMC samples with granulocytes (CD66b+). c, t-SNE analysis of CyTOF of all merged PBMC samples without granulocytes. Key marker t-SNE feature plots of CD3 (total T cells), CD4 (Helper CD4+ T cells), CD8 (Cytotoxic T cells), CD19 (B cells), CD11b (Myeloid cells), CCR2, PDL-1, and CD68 (Macrophage marker). d, Bar plots of relative cell type abundance (B cell, CD4+/CD8+ T cell, CD4+ T cell, CD4-/CD8- T cell, Dendritic cell, CD14+/CD16+ Monocyte, CD14+/CD16- Monocyte, and CD14- CD16+ Monocyte) from CyTOF of PBMCs of healthy, chronic pancreatitis, and PDA patients. e, Quantification of unbiased analysis (Astrolabe pipeline) of PBMC immune populations in n=16 healthy patients, n=36 PDA patients, and n=10 chronic pancreatitis patients. Two-sided Student’s t-tests were performed to compare between groups and a p value of <0.05 was considered significant. f, Relative CyTOF marker expression in CD8+ T Cells from PDA tumor tissue. g, PCA analysis of PBMCs at different disease states. Healthy (neon blue), PDA (red), and Chronic Pancreatitis (green).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 7 Immunofluorescence of immune checkpoints in pancreatic tumors.

a, Individual channels of immunofluorescent staining of patient tissues with antibodies specific for TIGIT/CD8A, TIGIT/FOXP3, PVR/Pan-cytokeratin, PVR/CD163, PVR/Vimentin, and PVR/VE-cadherin. Three individual patient tumors were examined independently per staining analysis. b, Manual gating of PD-L1+ CD68+ macrophages in normal adjacent (n=8) and PDA (n=10) tissue. Two-sided Student’s t-test was performed, and asterisk indicates a p value of <0.05, which was considered statistically significant. Representative individual CyTOF biaxial density plots from normal adjacent and PDA tissue of a matched patient (19–262) of PD-L1 expression in CD68+ macrophages (as a percentage of total CD11b+ cells).

Source data

Supplementary information

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Source numerical data.

Source Data Fig. 3

Source numerical data.

Source Data Fig. 7

Source numerical data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 1

Source numerical data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 4

Source numerical data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 6

Source numerical data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 7

Source numerical data.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Steele, N.G., Carpenter, E.S., Kemp, S.B. et al. Multimodal mapping of the tumor and peripheral blood immune landscape in human pancreatic cancer. Nat Cancer 1, 1097–1112 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43018-020-00121-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43018-020-00121-4

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer