Skip to main content
Log in

Prognosis of Acral Melanoma: A Series of 281 Patients

  • Melanomas
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Acral melanoma (AM) is an unusual malignancy with poor survival. This study defines a cohort of patients, treated at a single institution, and the factors associated with survival and comparison with nonacral cutaneous melanoma (NACM).

Methods

All patients with AM presenting from 1995 to 2010 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Analysis of clinicopathologic features of AM associated with disease-specific survival (DSS) was performed. A stratified, stage-matched survival analysis compared the outcome of 281 acral to 843 extremity NACM patients.

Results

A total of 281 AM patients (170 volar, 111 subungual) were identified. Pathologic stage (p < 0.001), ulceration (p < 0.001), Breslow thickness (p < 0.001), and a positive sentinel lymph node (p < 0.001) were found to be poor prognostic indicators associated with DSS. In stage-matched analysis, AM had a worse DSS compared with NACM (hazard ratio 1.8; 95 % CI 1.2–2.7; p < 0.01).

Conclusions

This study represents the largest, single-institution series describing the characteristics and outcomes of AM. AM tumors exhibit aggressive histopathologic features associated with a poorer survival outcome. AM patients have an inferior survival than extremity NACM when matched for stage, perhaps reflecting inherent alterations in tumor biology. This warrants further investigation into the differences between acral and cutaneous melanoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. Cancer J Clin. 2012;62:10–29.

  2. Bristow I, Acland K. Acral lentiginous melanoma of the foot and ankle: a case series and review of the literature. J Foot Ankle Res. 2008;1:11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Piliang MP. Acral lentiginous melanoma. Clin Lab Med. 2011;31:281–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Reed R. New concepts in surgical pathology of the skin. New York: Wiley; 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bradford PT, Goldstein AM, McMaster ML, Tucker MA. Acral lentiginous melanoma: incidence and survival patterns in The United States, 1986–2005. Arch Dermatol. 2009;145:427–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu X-C, Eide MJ, King J, Saraiya M, Huang Y, Wiggins C, et al. Racial and ethnic variations in incidence and survival of cutaneous melanoma in the United States, 1999–2006. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65:S26–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Markovic SN, Erickson LA, Rao RD, Weenig RH, Pockaj BA, Bardia A, et al. Malignant melanoma in the 21st century, part 1: epidemiology, risk factors, screening, prevention, and diagnosis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82:364–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Collins KK, Fields RC, Baptiste D, Liu Y, Moley J, Jeffe DB. Racial differences in survival after surgical treatment for melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:2925–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Green A, McCredie M, MacKie R, Giles G, Young P, Morton C, et al. A case-control study of melanomas of the soles and palms (Australia and Scotland). Cancer Causes Control. 1999;10:21–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bormann G, Marsch WC, Haerting J, Helmbold P. Concomitant traumas influence prognosis in melanomas of the nail apparatus. Br J Dermatol. 2006;155:76–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rolón PA, Kramárová E, Rolón HI, Khlat M, Parkin DM. Plantar melanoma: a case-control study in Paraguay. Cancer Causes Control. 1997;8:850–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Phan A, Touzet S, Dalle S, Ronger-Savlé S, Balme B, Thomas L. Acral lentiginous melanoma: a clinicoprognostic study of 126 cases. Br J Dermatol. 2006;155:561–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. O’Leary JA, Berend KR, Johnson JL, Levin LS, Seigler HF. Subungual melanoma: a review of 93 cases with identification of prognostic variables. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;(378):206–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pollack LA, Li J, Berkowitz Z, Weir HK, Wu XC, Ajani UA, et al. Melanoma survival in The United States, 1992 to 2005. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65(5 Suppl 1):S78–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuchelmeister C, Schaumburg-Lever G, Garbe C. Acral cutaneous melanoma in Caucasians: clinical features, histopathology and prognosis in 112 Patients. Br J Dermatol. 2000;143:275–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Slingluff CL, Vollmer R, Seigler HF. Acral melanoma: a review of 185 patients with identification of prognostic variables. J Surg Oncol. 1990;45:91–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tan K-B, Moncrieff M, Thompson JF, McCarthy SW, Shaw HM, Quinn MJ, et al. Subungual melanoma: a study of 124 cases highlighting features of early lesions, potential pitfalls in diagnosis, and guidelines for histologic reporting. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31:1902–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Balch CM, Gershenwald JE, Soong S-J, Thompson JF, Atkins MB, Byrd DR, et al. Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:6199–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Klein J, Moeschberger M. Techniques for censored and truncated data. New York: Springer; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Moehrle M, Metzger S, Schippert W, Garbe C, Rassner G, Breuninger H. “Functional” surgery in subungual melanoma. Dermatol Surg. 2003;29:366–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Barnes BC, Seigler HF, Saxby TS, Kocher MS, Harrelson JM. Melanoma of the foot. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:892–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Durbec F, Martin L, Derancourt C, Grange F. Melanoma of the hand and foot: epidemiological, prognostic and genetic features. A systematic review. Br J Dermatol. 2012;166:727–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Heaton K, El-Naggar A, Ensign L, Ross M, Balch C. Surgical management and prognostic factors in patients with subungual melanoma. Ann Surg. 1994;219:197–204.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gershenwald JE, Mansfield PF, Lee JE, Ross MI. Role for lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with thick (>or = 4 mm) primary melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000;7:160–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Morton DL, Thompson JF, Cochran AJ, Mozzillo N, Elashoff R, Essner R, et al. Sentinel-node biopsy or nodal observation in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1307–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yee VS, Thompson JF, McKinnon JG, Scolyer RA, Li LX, McCarthy WH, et al. Outcome in 846 cutaneous melanoma patients from a single center after a negative sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12:429–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Scolyer RA, Thompson JF, Stretch JR, Sharma R, McCarthy SW. Pathology of melanocytic lesions: new, controversial, and clinically important issues. J Surg Oncol. 2004;86:200–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Egger ME, McMasters KM, Callender GG, Quillo AR, Martin RC 2nd, Stromberg AJ, et al. Unique prognostic factors in acral lentiginous melanoma. Am J Surg. 2012;204:874–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rex J, Paradelo C, Mangas C, Hilari JM, Fernandez-Figueras MT, Ferrandiz C. Management of primary cutaneous melanoma of the hands and feet: a clinicoprognostic study. Dermatol Surg. 2009;35:1505–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Krauthammer M, Kong Y, Ha BH, Evans P, Bacchiocchi A, McCusker JP, et al. Exome sequencing identifies recurrent somatic RAC1 mutations in melanoma. Nat Genet. 2012;44:1006–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Curtin JA, Fridlyand J, Kageshita T, Patel HN, Busam KJ, Kutzner H, et al. Distinct sets of genetic alterations in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2135–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Furney SJ, Turajlic S, Fenwick K, Lambros MB, MacKay A, Ricken G, et al. Genomic characterisation of acral melanoma cell lines. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2012;25:488–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Curtin JA, Busam K, Pinkel D, Bastian BC. Somatic activation of KIT in distinct subtypes of melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4340–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Turajlic S, Furney SJ, Lambros MB, Mitsopoulos C, Kozarewa I, Geyer FC, et al. Whole genome sequencing of matched primary and metastatic acral melanomas. Genome Res. 2012;22:196–207.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Kita Bogatch and the Melanoma Disease Management Team for their significant contributions to this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charlotte E. Ariyan MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bello, D.M., Chou, J.F., Panageas, K.S. et al. Prognosis of Acral Melanoma: A Series of 281 Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 20, 3618–3625 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3089-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3089-0

Keywords

Navigation